Simpleton
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 17,561
Agreed, I'm pissed off enough that we took Escobar in the 2nd as is, Eifert in the 1st would've sent me over the edge. Obviously if you're saying would you rather have Eifert/Frederick or Frederick/Escobar you'd go with Eifert because he's better than Escobar but hindsight is 20/20 and I know for a fact that I would've broken something if we went Eifert at 18.Not for me. This two TE madness is over the top.
Assuming we would've taken Frederick in the 2nd (if he had even been there) and then Wilcox in the 3rd since I'll just assume one of the 3 teams who took WR's between our Williams/Wilcox picks would have taken Williams this is the true comparison:
Eifert/Frederick/Wilcox or Frederick/Escobar/Williams/Wilcox
Basically you're downgrading from Eifert to Escobar and banking on Williams to make up the difference, which I'm willing to gamble on.
And this is assuming Frederick is even there at 47 which isn't 100%, if you gave me the choice to trade Frederick for Eifert straight up right now I wouldn't even consider it.