Ok, so I know everyone got all pissed off with me when I questioned Romo being put on IR. But we are now sitting at 6-7 weeks from the injury and Romo is throwing and from the looks of it throwing pretty well. If Romo was healthy enough to play today, was it not a dumb decision to put him on IR? I mean even at 2-5 if we had Romo coming back this week I'd feel good about this season still.
I don't know that for sure. But the bone should be healed at this point. I also doubt they would allow him to throw if the bone wasn't healed.Who's saying he's healthy enough to play today? Just because he's healthy enough to throw a football in a controlled environment, doesn't mean he's healthy enough to take a hit.
I don't know that for sure. But the bone should be healed at this point. I also doubt they would allow him to throw if the bone wasn't healed.
Considering he is right now at the average time it takes to be healed from that injury and he is now on the practice field throwing balls, it's not really a stretch. But sure, act pissy as always.Sounds legit. You've convinced me.
It was a joke, not a dick. Don't take it so hard.But sure, act pissy as always.
Should have stopped right there,I don't know that for sure. But the bone should be healed at this point. I also doubt they would allow him to throw if the bone wasn't healed.
Sure and most bones are fully healed in six weeks. Which it has been past now. He is right at the average healing time of this injury and he is throwing.Should have stopped right there,
A bone can be healed enough to soft toss and not be healed enough for game action, you have to understand that right?
I like to think that you are wearing a lab coat and looking under a microscope as you ask this condescending question.Should have stopped right there,
A bone can be healed enough to soft toss and not be healed enough for game action, you have to understand that right?
I like to think that you are wearing a lab coat and looking under a microscope as you ask this condescending question.
So now being condescending is a problem here?I like to think that you are wearing a lab coat and looking under a microscope as you ask this condescending question.
It was condescending, you have to understand that right?So now being condescending is a problem here?
Or is it that I am being condescending?
And coming from you, the irony is rich.
Never said it was not.It was condescending, you have to understand that right?
Boo hoo.Never said it was not.
You calling me out while being one of the most condescending posters here is what's laughable.