Gosselin: Tony Romo's replacement isn't in the draft, he's in Detroit

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,987
Gosselin: Tony Romo's replacement isn't in the draft, he's in Detroit


By Rick Gosselin Follow @RickGosselinDMN rgosselin@dallasnews.com

Staff Columnist


Published: 20 October 2015 12:03 PM

Updated: 20 October 2015 02:22 PM


I'm changing my philosophy with the Cowboys.

I've long been an advocate of drafting a quarterback. Every year. If you don't draft them, you never have a chance of developing one. Always have a young, talented arm in the pipeline so you don't get caught short like the Cowboys have this season.

But my read on the Cowboys is they lack the confidence to draft the right quarterback and develop him if and when he does get here. What other explanation could there be? Since winning their last Super Bowl, the Cowboys have selected two quarterbacks in the last 20 drafts -- Quincy Carter with a second-rounder in 2001 and Stephen McGee with a fourth-rounder in 2009.

Both washed out.

So the Cowboys have gone all in on Tony Romo since he became the starter in 2006. That's why Jerry gave him a six-year, $108 million contract in 2013 even though he was already 33 years of age. Life with Romo -- even an aging Romo -- looked a whole lot better to Jones than life without Romo. And since signing the contract, Romo has had work done on his back.

So the Cowboys are committed to Romo through the 2019 season. Then what?

I'll tell you what.

Jones has always been an owner who likes to buy proven commodities. That eliminates the guesswork of the draft.

His list of talented mercenaries is long: Deion Sanders, Ray Donaldson, Raghib Ismail, Eddie George, La'Roi Glover, Kevin Hardy, Leonard Davis, Drew Bledsoe, Brandon Carr, Henry Melton and, more recently, Greg Hardy. Why develop a Pro Bowler when you can sign one?

So I don't expect the next quarterback of the Cowboys to be a draft pick. When the time comes to replace Romo, I believe Jones will go shopping for a proven commodity.

And that proven commodity might be in Detroit right now.

Matthew Stafford was the first overall selection of the 2009 draft. He played four years on his six-year rookie contract before signing a three-year extension in 2013 for an extra $53 million. That'll keep him in Detroit through the 2017 season.

Stafford turns 30 in 2018. And he's a local. He played his high-school football at Highland Park.

Stafford is also proven. Only four quarterbacks in history have had 5,000-yard passing seasons -- Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Drew Brees ... and Stafford. He reached 20,000 career passing yards faster than Dan Marino, setting an NFL record in the process. He threw his 100th TD pass in his 55th game. Only Marino, Kurt Warner and Johnny Unitas got there quicker.

Locals might recall Stafford rallying the Lions from a 24-point deficit against the Cowboys at AT&T Stadium in 2011. The Lions scored the game's final 17 points in the fourth quarter for a 34-30 win on a Stafford touchdown pass to Calvin Johnson with 1:39 remaining. Stafford also passed for 323 yards and a touchdown against the Cowboys at AT&T Stadium last January in a wild-card playoff game, only to see his Lions came up short, 24-20.

Stafford has led the Lions on 18 fourth-quarter comebacks. He has thrown six TD passes to win games in the final minute and six more to win games inside the two-minute warning. He has been to the Pro Bowl and been a Pro Bowl MVP.

I took a busman's holiday to Detroit last weekend and attended the Lions-Bears game. I saw Stafford at his best. He completed 27 passes for 405 yards and four touchdowns in a 37-34 overtime victory over the Bears. He also had a 500-yard passing game against Green Bay in 2012.

But the fans in Detroit are losing patience with Stafford. They have expected more winning, bigger winning, than Stafford has delivered. He has taken the Lions to the playoffs twice in his six seasons. This is a franchise that has not won a championship in 58 years and failed to qualify for the playoffs in any of the nine seasons prior to Stafford's arrival. Yet talk radio in Motown barbecues Stafford on a daily basis.

So go all in on Romo now. Don't waste any draft picks on quarterbacks. Keep building a supporting cast for him. Give Romo the 2016 and 2017 seasons to win a Super Bowl. But remember, quarterbacks don't stay great forever. The Packers let Brett Favre go at 39, the 49ers discarded Joe Montana at 37 and the Jets said good-bye to Joe Namath at 34.

When Romo turns 38 in 2018, I'd look around. Especially if Stafford is a free agent and looking around himself. An heir apparent may embrace the idea of coming home.

Listen to Rick Gosselin at 10:50 a.m. Tuesdays on Sportsradio 1310 AM/96.7 FM The Ticket with Norm Hitzges and Donovan Lewis, and follow @RickGosselinDMN on Twitter.
----------------

Not sure I could approve of this. Stafford is just awful at times.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
Compared to the guys we've seen get huge deals (Russell, Cutler, Tannehill) I'd say he's worth signing. It's a bit of a pipe dream, but I think Stafford would do well here. Especially if Linehan is still around.

I don't see us picking a better guy in the draft either. Considering we very nearly took Manziel, we clearly have no idea how to draft a f***ing QB.

Unless Payton ends up as our head coach, I don't see us training a guy up for a very long time.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
If Stafford is a free agent it would be because Detroit didn't want him, not because they couldn't afford him.

Situations like a Drew Brees hitting free agency just don't happen very often. That was a perfect storm of him being injured and San Diego drafting Eli and trading for Rivers.

He went to New Orleans and will probably be a first ballot HOFer.

Stafford is a fixer-upper who reminds me more of Jay Cutler.

BTW, I started skimming the moment they listed Eddie George as one of Jerry's "talented" mercenaries.
 

UncleMilti

This seemed like a good idea at the time.
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
18,002
Fuck that. Stafford is downright terrible at times.

The Cowboys need to draft a QB that can grow with the young OL they have put together. These newer college QBs are quicker to learn the position at the NFL level, and can progress quickly from season to season.

No need to invest in another 30+ year old QB.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,035
Ugh, never won a playoff game, only went to the playoffs once. Stafford is kind of a stat compiler who puts up numbers against prevent defenses. I'm not a fan. Certainly we could do worse in the draft, but the NFL is about winning and Stafford doesn't do that. Probably because his accuracy is below average.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,035
Stafford is a fixer-upper who reminds me more of Jay Cutler.
Reminds me a lot of Cutler. Puts up good stats but doesn't win. Basically too good to draft his replacement but not good enough to ever win you anything.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
Reminds me a lot of Cutler. Puts up good stats but doesn't win. Basically too good to draft his replacement but not good enough to ever win you anything.
Completely agree. The kid flat out has a cannon for an arm, but I don't see the smarts that should be taking over games at this point in QB's career.
 

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,611
If Linehan is still in place by the time this is remotely possible, I say it might be a natural fit.
But no way in hell do I not draft someone in the meantime with the intent to make them the heir to Romo. Stafford would only be a stop gap while someone is being groomed by our crack quarterback guru, one Wade Wilson.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
You draft a guy in the 1st or 2nd round once Romo loses effectiveness.

Or maybe trade for someone promising who's stuck behind another QB (Brett Favre or Mark Brunnell).

QB free agency is bullshit. You'll end up with Neil O'Donnell, not Drew Brees (once in a generation FA fluke).
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
You draft a guy in the 1st or 2nd round once Romo loses effectiveness.

Or maybe trade for someone promising who's stuck behind another QB (Brett Favre or Mark Brunnell).

QB free agency is bullshit. You'll end up with Neil O'Donnell, not Drew Brees (once in a generation FA fluke).
Yeah I not for trying to pick someone else's down trending quarterback..
 

GShock

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
6,399
The problem with the draft is you have to have the top pick to get a consensus can't miss guy (and even then, it's not guaranteed - see 2001-Vick, 2002-Carr, 2005-Alex Smith, 2006-Vince Young, 2007-JaMarcus Russell, 2009-Stafford, 2010-Bradford) or there might be no QB (see 2000-Pennington at 18, 2013 - Manuel at 16, 2014 - Bortles at 3).

As we know from the 5 years between Aikman and Romo, that wilderness of hopelessness can be long.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
The problem with the draft is you have to have the top pick to get a consensus can't miss guy (and even then, it's not guaranteed - see 2001-Vick, 2002-Carr, 2005-Alex Smith, 2006-Vince Young, 2007-JaMarcus Russell, 2009-Stafford, 2010-Bradford) or there might be no QB (see 2000-Pennington at 18, 2013 - Manuel at 16, 2014 - Bortles at 3).

As we know from the 5 years between Aikman and Romo, that wilderness of hopelessness can be long.
The other side of the coin is that the examples given May also prove the so called can't miss draft position isn't that at all. The odds may be just as good looking further down in the draft for players that fit the criteria for what type QB you need and are looking for.
 

GShock

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
6,399
The other side of the coin is that the examples given May also prove the so called can't miss draft position isn't that at all. The odds may be just as good looking further down in the draft for players that fit the criteria for what type QB you need and are looking for.
The further down you go, the worse it gets. You can hit the lottery, but that's essentially what it is.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
The problem with the draft is you have to have the top pick to get a consensus can't miss guy (and even then, it's not guaranteed - see 2001-Vick, 2002-Carr, 2005-Alex Smith, 2006-Vince Young, 2007-JaMarcus Russell, 2009-Stafford, 2010-Bradford) or there might be no QB (see 2000-Pennington at 18, 2013 - Manuel at 16, 2014 - Bortles at 3).
But you've got to try, because the draft is where the next great QB is coming from. I have mad respect for trying and failing in favor of endless reaches and shortcuts like Quincy, Hutchinson, Henson, Leaf, etc.

And worry about "the consensus" (Gino, Ponder, Manuel, Weeden), less and trust your scouts and instincts more (Carr, Dalton).

If you feel the QB class is suspect, don't use your #1 and wait until the 2nd round. If you feel it's loaded like 2004, then trade the fuck up and get your guy.

And don't sleep on Blake Bortles, cause he's kind of killing it even without an OL or defense to speak of.
 

E_D_Guapo

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
3,158
Agree with the Cutler comparisons. I feel like Stafford would be in Dallas what he has been in Detroit...good enough in stretches to make everyone optimistic but ultimately not a guy who is going to take a team all the way.
 

VA Cowboy

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
4,710
Agree with the Cutler comparisons. I feel like Stafford would be in Dallas what he has been in Detroit...good enough in stretches to make everyone optimistic but ultimately not a guy who is going to take a team all the way.
So basically another Romo.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
So basically another Romo.
Meh, that's what everyone would still be saying about Drew Brees if he had stayed a Charger. I don't think there's anything more idiotic than Blaming a guy who hasn't thrown a post season interception since 2007 for a teams lack of championships. Frankly I was hoping that the perfect run in 2014 would finally erase all the hysterical Romo bashing. He played his ass off against Green Bay, I suppose he could have lined up on defense and rushed the passer too.

Could you imagine if other QBs who could "take their team all the way" had played hear. I don't think Tom Brady could have won a championship here. Much less Eli, Flacco, or Roethlisberger.
 
Top Bottom