Archer: Cowboys' vision has changed since July but hope remains

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,216
Cowboys' vision has changed since July but hope remains

Todd Archer, ESPN Staff Writer

IRVING, Texas -- About a week before training camp began, Dallas Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones stood in a team-themed restaurant inside Terminal A at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, feeling good about his team’s chances.

“I do believe we’ve put together a team here that’s one of the better ones we’ve had in quite some time,” Jones said at the time. “I do believe it’s all coming together for us.”

Hope was high in July.

The Cowboys thought they had the right answers at running back after losing DeMarco Murray in free agency. They added the best pass-rusher in free agency in Greg Hardy but knew he would miss the first four games. They added three first-round talents in the draft process with Byron Jones, Randy Gregory and La’el Collins. A week before Jones’ comments, the Cowboys signed Dez Bryant to a five-year, $70 million deal.

But Jones knows an offseason means nothing in the regular season. While optimistic, Jones had a sense of realism, too.

“It’s all about the production on the field,” Jones said last July. “We obviously feel like we got a lot accomplished. Whether we did or not remains to be seen, and it’ll all be in whether we have a successful season. We theoretically got done what we felt like we needed to do to make our team better and take the next step. Now we’ll see if it happens.”

Through five games, the Cowboys are 2-3, and some of the answers they thought they had in July remain questions in October and some answers remain incomplete.

Replacing Murray

Five games doesn’t make a season, but the Cowboys’ decision to not select a runner early in the draft -- or at all -- or make a bigger play in free agency is hurting them. Joseph Randle has not been effective. Neither has Darren McFadden. Lance Dunbar is out for the year with a knee injury.

It’s not all on the runners. The line, considered by many the best in football with Pro Bowlers Tyron Smith, Travis Frederick and Zack Martin, has not delivered. Collins will move into the starting lineup at left guard for Ronald Leary, and that might not be the only change to help the run game.

Christine Michael, picked up in a trade at the start of the season from the Seattle Seahawks, will get a chance to show if he can do what Randle and Murray haven’t.

The pass rush

Hardy has played in just one game, but he showed what kind of impact he can have with two sacks and five quarterback pressures of Tom Brady. The Cowboys will welcome Gregory back to the lineup after missing the past four games with a high ankle sprain.

The Cowboys had just three sacks in the first three games but have eight in the past two. The more Hardy plays, the more Gregory plays, the more their top pass-rushers play together, the more the Cowboys will affect the quarterback. In turn, they hope that leads to more (some?) takeaways.

The big plays

The Cowboys haven’t had Bryant since the opener because of a broken right foot. They might not have him Sunday either, but he will be back soon. Tony Romo will miss his fourth straight game and will not return from a broken left collarbone until Nov. 22 at the earliest.

The offense has been stagnant without its two best players and took another hit when Dunbar got hurt. Matt Cassel will start at quarterback after the Cowboys were unable to win in any of Brandon Weeden’s three starts.

The Cowboys were able to ground and pound teams last year, but they were able to hit big plays on the ground, through the air and on special teams. They have been suffocated in the past three games.

Perhaps Cassel can provide the spark needed until Romo returns.

The good news for the Cowboys? They play in the NFC East. They are a half-game out of first place with the Philadelphia Eagles beating the New York Giants on Monday Night Football. Did either team look impressive or unbeatable? Absolutely not.

The visions the Cowboys had of their roster in July look different now, but they still have a chance.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
It boils down to this. The Cowboys season is now completely dependent on Matt Cassel. Michael might do better than the others on the running game but he cannot carry the team. Truly a wait and see month in November.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,192
It boils down to this. The Cowboys season is now completely dependent on Matt Cassel. Michael might do better than the others on the running game but he cannot carry the team. Truly a wait and see month in November.
It is much more dependent on the run game and defense than Cassel. Our success last year was led by the run game chewing up clock and keeping the D off the field. Now more than ever we have to have a competent run game to take pressure off Cassel. In addition, the defense has been given all the tools to succeed this year...now with Gregory and Hardy back, the defense has to step up and be the strength of the team.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
If Dallas can't prove they can throw downfield then nothing will matter.

Teams will still stack against the run and the overrated OL will continue to pussy fart on the field.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
It boils down to this. The Cowboys season is now completely dependent on Matt Cassel. Michael might do better than the others on the running game but he cannot carry the team. Truly a wait and see month in November.
Murray last year couldn't carry this team. Without a legit passing threat it just changes your entire offense. You absolutely have to have a QB who can consistently get first downs.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,522
With a fully (relatively speaking with guys like Scandrick, McClain and so forth out) team I think we are top 5-7 in the league and a SB contender. I didn't like the direction of our offense because of what we were doing at RB, and I think that ultimately is what would have limited our ceiling to the divisional round or possibly NFCC, but with a healthy Romo, Dez, and a much improved pass rush I think it's hard to argue that we aren't at least a top 10 team in the league.

The defense has been good for the most part until the second halves or 4th quarters of games when they are basically worn down by the offense going 3 and out 60-75% of the time, so I can't really blame them.

At the end of the day, you build the best team you can going into training camp and hope that you don't get dicked over by injuries and luck, which are two huge factors in any given NFL season. We have been dicked by injuries but due to the shitty division we're in, we still have a shot.

Doesn't mean that the front office built a bad team or anything else because no team in this entire league would have success while losing what we have lost. They built a very talented team with a very high ceiling, all you can do is hope for the best for the rest of this year and then go into the offseason looking to address certain positions and give it a go again next year.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
With a fully (relatively speaking with guys like Scandrick, McClain and so forth out) team I think we are top 5-7 in the league and a SB contender. I didn't like the direction of our offense because of what we were doing at RB, and I think that ultimately is what would have limited our ceiling to the divisional round or possibly NFCC, but with a healthy Romo, Dez, and a much improved pass rush I think it's hard to argue that we aren't at least a top 10 team in the league.
I think you're being way too hard on these guys. With a healthy Dez and Romo I'd say we are easily top 5. No question we would have beaten the Saints and Falcons and at least hung in there with the Pats. The only think you can really knock the coaches for is building an offense that rely's so heavily on Romo. Some offensive coordinators are able to kind of run a dumbed down version of the offense when the starter gets hurt and still win games but we seem to be completely incapable of that. Our offensive is too difficult to run and our backup QBs suck too much. Other then that this team was built well. This defense is really going to start rounding into form, I just wish we had an offense to compliment it and help them out.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
It is much more dependent on the run game and defense than Cassel. Our success last year was led by the run game chewing up clock and keeping the D off the field. Now more than ever we have to have a competent run game to take pressure off Cassel. In addition, the defense has been given all the tools to succeed this year...now with Gregory and Hardy back, the defense has to step up and be the strength of the team.
I hope the run game is cured but it remains to be seen. Defenses will continue to load up against the run until they have to realign because of a passing threat. If that can happen then Dallas might be able to run the ball more effectively but Cassel will have to deliver the pass threat.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,522
I think you're being way too hard on these guys. With a healthy Dez and Romo I'd say we are easily top 5. No question we would have beaten the Saints and Falcons and at least hung in there with the Pats. The only think you can really knock the coaches for is building an offense that rely's so heavily on Romo. Some offensive coordinators are able to kind of run a dumbed down version of the offense when the starter gets hurt and still win games but we seem to be completely incapable of that. Our offensive is too difficult to run and our backup QBs suck too much. Other then that this team was built well. This defense is really going to start rounding into form, I just wish we had an offense to compliment it and help them out.
Yea, perhaps, we should have done more at the RB position as well.

Other than that, I agree, no matter what happens this season you go into the offseason next year looking for a more reliable RB and backup QB (maybe Cassel already is that?) , keep adding defensive talent, maybe look at a WR and hope things come together better next season. Do that and I would go into 2016 with just as high, if not higher expectations than I did coming into this year.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Murray last year couldn't carry this team. Without a legit passing threat it just changes your entire offense. You absolutely have to have a QB who can consistently get first downs.
Murray didn't have to carry the team. The offense was balanced. I think we agree on that.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,192
Murray didn't have to carry the team. The offense was balanced. I think we agree on that.
Murray absolutely was key to everything...the run game was anyways. Took pressure off Romo, kept the defense fresh, and shortened games. We were 2nd in the NFL in rushing attempts and led the league in TOP. The emphasis on the run keyed a real run in the playoffs.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,522
Just throwing this out there, Lamar Miller, Alfred Morris and Chris Ivory are all free agents next year. I think those guys could be had for about 4-5 a year, similar to Mark Ingram last year, Ivory may price himself out of that range though if he keeps playing well. A guy like Morris may even be cheaper than that since it seems like Gruden wants to phase him out of the offense, I'd be happy with him as a solid RB who can move the chains, run physical between the tackles and keep the offense on track.

We all know the RB market is devalued and with several guys of their caliber out there as free agents, I think one could be had for a decent price. It would give us a reliable RB and we wouldn't be forced into drafting one with a premium pick unless we really wanted to.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Murray absolutely was key to everything...the run game was anyways. Took pressure off Romo, kept the defense fresh, and shortened games. We were 2nd in the NFL in rushing attempts and led the league in TOP. The emphasis on the run keyed a real run in the playoffs.
Where was everyone last season when I was saying that?
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
Just throwing this out there, Lamar Miller, Alfred Morris and Chris Ivory are all free agents next year. I think those guys could be had for about 4-5 a year, similar to Mark Ingram last year, Ivory may price himself out of that range though if he keeps playing well. A guy like Morris may even be cheaper than that since it seems like Gruden wants to phase him out of the offense, I'd be happy with him as a solid RB who can move the chains, run physical between the tackles and keep the offense on track.
We are a long way away from talking about the off season moves that need to be made. The first step is seeing what Christine Michael can do. If he sucks then clearly we will need to be in the RB market after this season. Even still there is a whole draft to consider as well.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
Murray didn't have to carry the team. The offense was balanced. I think we agree on that.
Yep, Murray was an excellent RB for us last year but he fed off the passing game just as much as the passing game fed off him.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,522
We are a long way away from talking about the off season moves that need to be made. The first step is seeing what Christine Michael can do. If he sucks then clearly we will need to be in the RB market after this season. Even still there is a whole draft to consider as well.
Unless Michael looks like a guy who can handle 15-20 carries a game I can guarantee you that we will be in the market for a RB, and if not in free agency, it will be high in the draft, perhaps even in the 1st with a guy like Elliott or Henry, which I know you'll hate.

Next year is the last on Randle's deal, the team clearly doesn't trust him, McFadden isn't long for this team and that leaves us with Michael and Dunbar coming off an ACL. Unless Michael just goes ape shit I can almost guarantee you that we will either sign a guy or draft one early on, I'm just taking an early look at potential options.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,192
Yep, Murray was an excellent RB for us last year but he fed off the passing game just as much as the passing game fed off him.
Definitely, but Murray also had 998 yards after contact...so he did quite a bit for himself.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
Unless Michael looks like a guy who can handle 15-20 carries a game I can guarantee you that we will be in the market for a RB, and if not in free agency, it will be high in the draft, perhaps even in the 1st with a guy like Elliott or Henry, which I know you'll hate.
Yeah, I'm not big on first round RBs at all. Just not enough production comparatively speaking with RBs from other rounds and the shelf life is too short. But if Michael has a few 100 yard games down the stretch, RB will become an after thought next season. Especially since they have Randle as a backup under contract for another year.

If we are talking about offseason, what I'd really want is probably a QB or WR in the first couple rounds. I like some of the QBs, can't say I know much about the WR class this year. Looks kind of weak at the top from first glance.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,192
Yeah, I'm not big on first round RBs at all. Just not enough production comparatively speaking with RBs from other rounds and the shelf life is too short. But if Michael has a few 100 yard games down the stretch, RB will become an after thought next season. Especially since they have Randle as a backup under contract for another year.

If we are talking about offseason, what I'd really want is probably a QB or WR in the first couple rounds. I like some of the QBs, can't say I know much about the WR class this year. Looks kind of weak at the top from first glance.
The way this team is built, I'd have no hesitation taking a RB in the first round. This team has a very small window...if we got 4-5 good years out of a RB I would be very happy.
 
Top Bottom