Archer: Cowboys already feeling a draft?

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,230
Cowboys already feeling a draft?

Todd Archer, ESPN Staff Writer

IRVING, Texas – The Dallas Cowboys are in the midst of their first three-game losing streak of the Jason Garrett era and wondering when they will break out of it.

I’m wondering that as well, but also some other things for this week’s edition of Five Wonders.

It’s way too early to think about the draft, right? Well, that’s what happens when a team loses three in a row and might not be able to stay in the race before Tony Romo returns. I don’t wonder if the Cowboys will draft a quarterback. My stance is known: when Romo is done, then that’s when I draft a quarterback. But I do wonder if they will look heavily at running back and wide receiver after what has happened this season. They didn’t feel the running back spot fell the right way for them last spring and didn’t take one despite it being considered a strong class for backs. Receiver Terrance Williams will be in the final year of his contract in 2016. The Cowboys haven’t gotten anything from Devin Street. I’m not sure they can count on Brice Butler. I wondered this back in the summer about the Cowboys needing protection if something happened to Dez Bryant or Williams because of injuries. So far they don’t have an answer. They need an answer next spring at both positions.

You can complain about the number of pick plays the New England Patriots ran against the Cowboys all you want, but they were willing to do it, knowing the officials would not throw the flag all the time. That’s the tradeoff. But I wonder if the Cowboys need to address how they handle pick plays, rub routes, bunch formations. They have played a lot of man coverage, going to the strengths of their cornerbacks, but playing zone eliminates the pick-play issues. If they stick with man coverage, then they have to do a better job of passing off the receivers from defensive back to defensive back. The way it is going now, they don’t have an answer for those plays. By the way, why don’t the Cowboys scheme some of those plays to get their receivers open?

I wonder if the Cowboys go with eight offensive linemen on the gameday roster if they’re not going to make a change at left guard with La'el Collins for Ronald Leary. Collins has been inactive the past two weeks after starting against the Atlanta Falcons. The Cowboys don’t see the need for an eighth linemen when they need to spread snaps around to other spots. Mackenzy Bernadeau is the backup interior lineman because he can play center. Collins can’t, and Zack Martin would be the backup center if they de-activate Bernadeau. By going with seven, however, do they have their best players on the roster? And for a wonder inside a wonder, I wonder when the league just allows teams to dress all 53 players for games. But that’s another story for another time.

I wonder if it’s Christine Michael time. I actually thought Joseph Randle ran hard and fairly well against the Patriots. I’m just not seeing much from Darren McFadden. Michael has two carries the past two weeks in third-and-1 situations. It’s time to expand his playing time. It’s a little like the quarterback situation. I don’t know that Matt Cassel will be better than Brandon Weeden, but it just feels like a time for a change. The same goes at running back. I’d give Michael more looks as a runner than McFadden.

I wonder if the Cowboys’ inability to create a turnover will end Oct. 25 against the New York Giants. They haven’t taken the ball away since their Week 2 win against the Philadelphia Eagles, but they have played Matt Ryan, Drew Brees and Tom Brady. Those quarterbacks don’t give defenses many chances. Eli Manning doesn’t give many chances, either, these last few years, but he has thrown two interceptions in his past two games. He has thrown more interceptions against the Cowboys (23) than any other team. So that’s a positive, right?
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
Todd Gurley would have been worth a trade up. Just saying.

I wonder if it’s Christine Michael time. I actually thought Joseph Randle ran hard and fairly well against the Patriots. I’m just not seeing much from Darren McFadden. Michael has two carries the past two weeks in third-and-1 situations. It’s time to expand his playing time. It’s a little like the quarterback situation. I don’t know that Matt Cassel will be better than Brandon Weeden, but it just feels like a time for a change. The same goes at running back. I’d give Michael more looks as a runner than McFadden.
There must be something really wrong with Michael in the passing game. It doesn't make sense otherwise.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,530
Everybody here would've been pissed if we had traded what it would've taken to move up for Gurley (a 2nd, if not more), a RB coming off a torn ACL, when we just made a philosophical stand in not paying Murray big money. You might as well lament not drafting Tom Brady in the 5th round or Richard Sherman in the 4th round or any of the other hindsight is 20/20 types of moves over the years.

Plus, I'd rather have Randy Gregory moving forward than Gurley, who we would've certainly lost had we made a move up like that. Of course I'd love to have Gurley on this team but lamenting not moving up for Gurley is revisionist history.

And we definitely need to figure out how to get Michael some touches, the lack of creativity on the offensive side of the ball is stunning, even without Romo and Dez.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
Yeah...I don't get upset about not moving up for Gurley. I like Gregory and I really like Byron Jones. Yeah, he got beat a couple times, but I thought he was excellent.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
Gurley would be nice but he would have cost too much to move up for, where we missed on a chance for a rb is round 3
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
I am all about Cook and Elliot in the first...depending on where we end up.
 

GForce78NJ

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
1,301
Yeah...I don't get upset about not moving up for Gurley. I like Gregory and I really like Byron Jones. Yeah, he got beat a couple times, but I thought he was excellent.
I thought Byron Jones played very well for a rookie going up against an absolute mammoth of a man. There is a bright future for both him and Randy Gregory. All signs point to them being contributors for a long time in Big D.

I wouldn't be surprised if we continue to go to the defensive side of the ball in this draft. Although we played pretty good against New England, there are way too many holes. Yet WR and RB are showing as liabilities still as well
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,530
I thought Byron Jones played very well for a rookie going up against an absolute mammoth of a man. There is a bright future for both him and Randy Gregory. All signs point to them being contributors for a long time in Big D.

I wouldn't be surprised if we continue to go to the defensive side of the ball in this draft. Although we played pretty good against New England, there are way too many holes. Yet WR and RB are showing as liabilities still as well
RB will of course be in play, I like both Elliott and Henry as potential 1st rounders, and WR is a sneaky position for us to take in the 1st. I feel like we will really like Michael Thomas from Ohio St., Josh Doctson from TCU and Will Fuller from Notre Dame.

Of course defense is still in play and I'd be fine going DL again, even DE with a guy like Emmanuel Ogbah, or definitely LB in a guy like Myles Jack who will probably fall a bit after the injury.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
Gurley is everything people thought he'd be: an impact RB who might have missed the first month of the season, but otherwise will be a player defenses will have to account for on every offensive play for the rest of his career.

No position short of QB has a greater impact when played at a high level.

This team traded up to get Morris Claiborne, and Gurley is probably worth ten times that.

Consider Gurley already has made a bigger impact in two games than Jones and Gregory all season combined. Hell, I'd have traded this and next year's 1st with maybe a 4th in change back for Gurley.

The guy can carry an offense. The combination with Romo, Dez, and Witten would have made last year look like a warmup.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
Gurley is everything people thought he'd be: an impact RB who might have missed the first month of the season, but otherwise will be a player defenses will have to account for on every offensive play for the rest of his career.

No position short of QB has a greater impact when played at a high level.

This team traded up to get Morris Claiborne, and Gurley is probably worth ten times that to our team.

Consider Gurley already has made a bigger impact in two games than Jones and Gregory all season combined. Hell, I'd have traded this and next year's 1st with maybe a 4th in change back for Gurley.

The guy can carry an offense. The combination with Romo, Dez, and Witten would have made last year look like a warmup.
Gregory has been hurt and Gurley has impacted winning exactly how?

You have said some absurd things but trading 2 1st for Gurley is the most idiotic, he has been about as inpactful as Bell who was a 2nd round pick.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
Gregory has been hurt and Gurley has impacted winning exactly how?

You have said some absurd things but trading 2 1st for Gurley is the most idiotic, he has been about as inpactful as Bell who was a 2nd round pick.
If people knew what Bell was going to be, he'd have gone higher.

People thought Gurley was going to be a stud, and he is.
 
Top Bottom