Williams: Christine Michael trying to get up to speed with Cowboys offense

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,237
Christine Michael trying to get up to speed with Cowboys offense

BY CHAREAN WILLIAMS
cjwilliams@star-telegram.com

The Cowboys aren’t quite sure what role Christine Michael will have, and he isn’t quite sure either. But he’s holed up in the running backs room, trying to catch up on the playbook so they can figure that out.

Michael, whom the Cowboys acquired from the Seahawks on Sunday for a conditional seventh-round draft choice, isn’t expected to play against the Giants.

“Backs probably get ready sooner than other positions,” offensive coordinator Scott Linehan said. “That’s been my experience. We’ll see. He just got here two days ago. He got in two practices and is learning our system on the run and spending a bunch of extra time with coach [Gary] Brown. What he’s shown is really positive. We like what we see. We think he’s going to bring a lot to the table. But again, give him some time to pick up the system, and we’ll see how fast that takes us there.”

Michael, a second-round pick of the Seahawks in 2013, rushed for only 254 yards and no touchdowns in his first two NFL seasons. He became expendable when the Seahawks signed former Arlington Lamar running back Fred Jackson after his release from Buffalo.

“Seattle has been good to me, man,” Michael said Thursday in his first interview since arriving in town. “They’ve changed my life. They blessed me; they drafted me in the second round. It was a great place and still is a great place. That’s my brothers down there, my coaching staff. It was great down there. But you have to move on and adapt to what’s new, and I like it here, too.”

Michael joins Joseph Randle, Darren McFadden and Lance Dunbar to form a committee to try and replace last season’s league-leading rusher, DeMarco Murray.

“Because it’s kind of the same scheme that Seattle had, a little bit different terminology, but I feel like I’ve got that down just after 72 hours,” Michael said. “That’s all I’ve been doing is coming to work, going back home and getting in the playbook. It’s been good, though. I’m enjoying it.”

Michael, who weighs 221 pounds, brings the Cowboys a physical, downhill running back they didn’t have on their roster before his arrival.

“He’s got some real explosiveness,” Michael said. “He’s a bigger back. Not tall, but doesn’t necessarily have to be a tall guy. The profile of a running back isn’t necessarily height. It’s that build, that size. He’s somewhere in the mid-200s, has some really good speed. Got to see him play some significant plays in the NFL in a similar-type running style as we run and see some things we really like. Again, we’re getting to know him, and he’s doing a really good job of picking things up quick.”
 

Newt

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,148
I think this is going to end up being a good move, I wish they would have pulled the trigger a little sooner, I think they could have gotten this done a few weeks ago I guess they just really wanted to give Randle every opportunity to take hold of the starting job.
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
“He’s got some real explosiveness,” Michael said. “He’s a bigger back. Not tall, but doesn’t necessarily have to be a tall guy. The profile of a running back isn’t necessarily height. It’s that build, that size. He’s somewhere in the mid-200s, has some really good speed. Got to see him play some significant plays in the NFL in a similar-type running style as we run and see some things we really like. Again, we’re getting to know him, and he’s doing a really good job of picking things up quick.”
I can see why Seattle got rid of him if he talks like this.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
I think this is going to end up being a good move, I wish they would have pulled the trigger a little sooner, I think they could have gotten this done a few weeks ago I guess they just really wanted to give Randle every opportunity to take hold of the starting job.
He's the only complete talent we have on the team. My concerns are why Seattle didn't want him,not his ability to perform in our offense.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
He's the only complete talent we have on the team. My concerns are why Seattle didn't want him,not his ability to perform in our offense.
Somewhere in one of the threads somebody posted that Seattle wants backs to anticipate holes that haven't happened yet. Which is what Lynch does very well. There've been many RBs including Marshawn himself who benefitted from getting out of a system or out of the shadow of an entrenched starter.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
Somewhere in one of the threads somebody posted that Seattle wants backs to anticipate holes that haven't happened yet. Which is what Lynch does very well. There've been many RBs including Marshawn himself who benefitted from getting out of a system or out of the shadow of an entrenched starter.
Murray developed a great feel for the OL's zone blocking last year.

Every back in the committee is going to have to develop the same skill this year, and the OL may end up finding a different rhythm under Pollack than they did with Callahan.

It truly is a different team and they must forge their own identity.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
Murray developed a great feel for the OL's zone blocking last year.

Every back in the committee is going to have to develop the same skill this year, and the OL may end up finding a different rhythm under Pollack than they did with Callahan.

It truly is a different team and they must forge their own identity.
Yeah. I'd be lying if I said I'm not a little nervous about the change in coaching. When something is as good as the Dallas Oline, changing any part of the equation seems like a risk.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
The folks that have a huge comfort level with the OL might be in for some surprises for the first three or four games via coaching and RB changes. I hope it doesn't become a big problem but there will be some hiccups for a while.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
I am worried about Oline performance if we pass a lot more. Run blocking really seems to be what this line was made to do, and it's just the best way to wear down a defense. I really hope we're comfortable rushing 25 times on Sunday with the committee.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,237
I am worried about Oline performance if we pass a lot more. Run blocking really seems to be what this line was made to do, and it's just the best way to wear down a defense. I really hope we're comfortable rushing 25 times on Sunday with the committee.
They seem to be pretty darn good at pass protection, too.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
I am worried about Oline performance if we pass a lot more. Run blocking really seems to be what this line was made to do, and it's just the best way to wear down a defense. I really hope we're comfortable rushing 25 times on Sunday with the committee.
It's about getting your best players into the game. Pass-blocking is passive (like a CB covering) .

Yes it greatly affects the game, and it could be considered the OL's most important function-- but they can actively make a difference and deliver blows run blocking.

Getting five studs including two all-pros running up field and hammering defenders sets an aggressive tone that not only gains yards but also damages the other team. Nothing saps your will like being tired and and getting hurt on top of it.

Few things energize football players more than delivering a hit, and you want your best players energized and playing their best as much as possible.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,891
I'm not worried about the loss of Callahan. Last year at this time a lot of us wanted Callahan gone since he was so disgruntled over being demoted. He's a good o-line coach but he's not the only good o-line coach.

Plus, these players are good.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,046
I'm not worried about the loss of Callahan. Last year at this time a lot of us wanted Callahan gone since he was so disgruntled over being demoted. He's a good o-line coach but he's not the only good o-line coach.

Plus, these players are good.
Callahan is a stellar offensive line coach and I said so last year when people thought he should go. No one wanted him go because of his skills as an offensive line coach. People wanted him gone because they were afraid he was disgruntled. I'm not saying that Callahan can't be replaced or that guys will suddenly unlearn everything the second he left but I think you still have to give the man credit. Look around the NFL and all the top offensive line picks that flame out. That somehow never happened in Dallas with our top picks under Callahan. You have to imagine he had some significant say in the drafting as well as the developing of those guys.
 
Top Bottom