Millions of people saw the game. 2 people agree on what they saw. Do you see how the 2 people agreeing doesn't really mean shit? Especially when his actual analysis doesn't agree with what you claim you saw. He saw a black man in a red jacket driving a van kidnap a kid. You saw a white guy in a corvette kidnap a kid. You both claim it was the same guy who did the kidnapping. Doesn't exactly validate either view does it?
Collins had an outstanding night against backups and Leary had an ok night against first stringers. This is just round 1.
No we are talking about two people making the same conclusion but based on totally different accounts of what happened. It means at least one opinion isn't credible.mschmidt64;p210143 said:
Didnt claim it was enough. But I maintain that Leary can be inconsistent and he was against the Chargers.
The accounts weren't completely different. I didn't give a complete play by play account and neither did he. Saying someone struggled doesn't carry a description of every play.
I was mainly addressing Sturm's claim. Collins is headed in that direction but the wheels have fall off of Leary for him to start at this point.
Didn't we already give that LaQuan guy a cup of coffee a couple of years ago?
Is that today, today?
I think so. I have been watching the Eagles Colts game and they have been promoting it.
Yep, and he lasted like a week.
Today and tomorrow.
The TV coverage is?
I don't think there is any.
Jimmy should already have done it.
They are anticipating it being used in a Super Bowl run.
Well yeah, the roster is set.