Cowboys sign Dez Bryant to 5 year deal

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
I agree. This type activity makes me wonder if he has really progressed much with behavioral issues.
Really?

What does posting on twitter have to do with behavioral issues, what in that tweet was off base.

I am no fan of twitter but it is how young people communicate to the masses these days, I do not see how in any way that can be extrapolated to behavioral issues.:shrug
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
I really don't like Dez campaigning for a contract through Twitter. That is pretty much the way it goes these days, but not sure why he just can't let the Cowboys know he would not play without a new deal...instead of having a bunch of his fans telling him to get paid and #pay88.
It's all about the PR battle, players now have the ability to tell their side off the story, be that right or wrong.

It kind of levels the playing field in the court of public opinion and puts pressure on the owners.

I have no issue with it especially when owners have been able to monopolize the message for the most part in the past.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
It's all about the PR battle, players now have the ability to tell their side off the story, be that right or wrong.

It kind of levels the playing field in the court of public opinion and puts pressure on the owners.

I have no issue with it especially when owners have been able to monopolize the message for the most part in the past.
Yeah...poor Dez is only slated to earn over 12 mil this year. As part of the public opinion, my heart does not bleed for him.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,237
Yeah...poor Dez is only slated to earn over 12 mil this year. As part of the public opinion, my heart does not bleed for him.
If there is anything that bothers me about all of this, it is that. Collect your 12 mill, bust your ass and then sign for mega millions next year. Do not hold out. I won't blame him for missing TC, but if he misses a single game I will be pissed and will consider him mentally right back where he was when he came into the league. Holding out gains him nothing.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,884
Yeah...poor Dez is only slated to earn over 12 mil this year. As part of the public opinion, my heart does not bleed for him.
I agree. He's retarded if he thinks doing this helps his PR.

I couldn't care less about Dez's money. I care about my team winning games. So going on Twitter threatening to hold out thereby making it harder for my team to win so that he can squeeze every last dollar out of my team's salary cap (making it harder for my team to win in the future) is certainly not going to win PR points from me.
 

vince

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
931
Some of my friends who are Giants fans created fake twitter accounts with Cowboys stuff encouraging Dez to hold out, hash tagging anything that has to do with making money. I bet Dez reads them and feels he's making the right choice.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,031
Yeah...poor Dez is only slated to earn over 12 mil this year. As part of the public opinion, my heart does not bleed for him.
People bring this stuff up all the time. Truth be told my heart doesn't bleed for anyone in the NFL. Even the league minimum guys are making a shit ton of money to play a game. I don't blame Dez for trying to get paid what he deserves to get paid though. I'm not going to sit here and hate on the guy like he is immature for trying to get what is the going rate for his talent.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,618
Trying to get what you deserve is one thing. Whining on Twitter about security is another and that's what it feels like to me when you go on social media with this stuff.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,237
For Cowboys, Dez Bryant it's more than just paying that man his money

By Todd Archer

IRVING, Texas -- As Wednesday's 4 p.m. deadline for Dez Bryant to sign a long-term deal approaches, there is a loud call for the Dallas Cowboys to simply pay the uber-talented wide receiver.

A lot of people have gone Teddy KGB from Rounders on us, using John Malkovich’s famous, "Pay that man his money" line.

Rob Lowe, noted Cowboys fan and someone who has attended training camp on a few occasions, chimed in via Twitter on Monday.



It is a no-brainer. Why wouldn’t the Cowboys want to keep Bryant? He led the NFL in touchdown catches last season, establishing a team single-season record with 16. He has had more than 80 catches and 1,200 yards the past three seasons.

At times it seems as if he was able to leap tall buildings in a single bound and has no Kryptonite (although sometimes Washington Redskins corner DeAngelo Hall can give him some trouble).

Without a salary cap there is no doubt Bryant would have the long-term contract he desires. Without a salary cap DeMarco Murray wouldn’t be with the Philadelphia Eagles and the Cowboys probably could have landed Darrelle Revis, too.

But "paying that man his money" is not that simple.

There is a salary cap. It is real. There are down-the-road ramifications that need to be factored in on every deal.

The Cowboys have changed their business model in recent years. Every big deal they have signed, with the exception of Tony Romo's contract, has been "team friendly." Sean Lee's deal has some built-in insurance in case he gets hurt so the team would not be on the hook for big money if he can’t play. Tyron Smith's contract included $40 million in guarantees, but the length and total money of the deal had many across the league viewing it as a Cowboys' win.

Even the smaller deals the Cowboys have signed in recent years, like Rolando McClain, Henry Melton, Anthony Spencer and Jasper Brinkley were advantageous to the Cowboys.

For years the Cowboys were criticized for overpaying players or doling out contracts to players before they needed to do something. Terrell Owens' second contract with the Cowboys comes to mind, as do the deals for Roy Williams (the receiver) and Miles Austin.

The Cowboys would not budge from their $6 million a year offer to Murray after he ran for 1,845 yards. Part of it was analytics, part of it was the belief in their offensive line, part of it was the position Murray plays.

They let him go to the Philadelphia Eagles without moving much on their offer.

"Everyone understands how this cap thing works," owner and general manager Jerry Jones said during the June minicamp. "The real responsibility here, as far as my shoes are concerned, or as far as the organization is concerned, is to allocate a fixed amount of money between the players that get it. So you literally do have money that one player gets that others don’t. So you’ve got to basically continue to strive for any individual situation as it relates to the whole team and what you’re spending on the whole team. That’s the art of the deal here, and that’s why you have the management issue regarding whether you can go this long, this much and for these terms. It has to do with the allocation of the dollars under the cap."

The Cowboys’ decisions of today will have ramifications two, three, four, five years down the road. Though the cap continues to go up, they have to be mindful of other players who will be hitting free agency, the ballooning cap figure of Romo and other unforeseen issues.

Maybe in the past the Cowboys wouldn’t have been so aware of the cap or would be more willing to structure a contract in a way that would keep forcing them to re-work the money to create room, which is something that ultimately led to the release of DeMarcus Ware after the 2013 season.

The Cowboys want to keep Bryant. They don’t want to lose him to another team. But they are not inclined to give him everything he wants no matter how much he has improved.

Bryant deserves to be paid among the best receivers in the NFL. He has every right to do what he’s done and threaten what might happen in order to make the best deal for him.

Perhaps there will be movement by Wednesday’s deadline, but it’s more complicated than just saying, "Pay that man his money."

________________________________________________________

Make most of his first year's salary signing bonus to save on cap space this year, cut Carr and Claiborne next year to make room for the rest of his contract and call it a day.
 

peplaw06

Brand New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Messages
294
People bring this stuff up all the time. Truth be told my heart doesn't bleed for anyone in the NFL. Even the league minimum guys are making a shit ton of money to play a game. I don't blame Dez for trying to get paid what he deserves to get paid though. I'm not going to sit here and hate on the guy like he is immature for trying to get what is the going rate for his talent.
Taking it a step further... I sure as hell don't feel sorry for the owners who have billion dollar franchises with revenues of $200 million per year, for having to drop $100 million over 7 years for an elite WR.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,237




Pretty much.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,031
Trying to get what you deserve is one thing. Whining on Twitter about security is another and that's what it feels like to me when you go on social media with this stuff.
No he just wants Dallas to take his threats of hold out seriously (As leverage to get the deal done). It's no different then Stephen or Jerry talking to the media which they do on a daily basis.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
No he just wants Dallas to take his threats of hold out seriously (As leverage to get the deal done). It's no different then Stephen or Jerry talking to the media which they do on a daily basis.
Jerry and Stephen are after all owners of the franchise and obviously are entitled to talk to the media about the clubs business. Bryant is airing club business to the public as a sympathy grab and all it does is create resentment and bad PR for the organization. I don't know how many employees you have but I dare say if you do you would not allow them to air your firm's business to the public via a twitter account or any other means at random.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,237
Jerry and Stephen are after all owners of the franchise and obviously are entitled to talk to the media about the clubs business. Bryant is airing club business to the public as a sympathy grab and all it does is create resentment and bad PR for the organization. I don't know how many employees you have but I dare say if you do you would not allow them to air your firm's business to the public via a twitter account or any other means at random.
Well, to be fair, he's not airing anything that's not already public knowledge.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
Jerry and Stephen are after all owners of the franchise and obviously are entitled to talk to the media about the clubs business. Bryant is airing club business to the public as a sympathy grab and all it does is create resentment and bad PR for the organization. I don't know how many employees you have but I dare say if you do you would not allow them to air your firm's business to the public via a twitter account or any other means at random.
Also he's talking about his career. There really isn't a public interest on whether Donald the 44 year old pharmacist a CVS will be at work on September 13th. That being said I'm pretty sure there are plenty of people who have tweeted about wanting a raise.

It may not be the smartest policy to do so, but CVS can find a new pharmacist. What we see with Dez Bryant is the leverage of an employee that isn't immediately replaceable. It's not written in stone that you can't talk about your relationship with your employer, it's just usually wise to practice discretion because they can fire you.

If Dallas decided they didn't need Dez he'd snapped up in a minute by the future 2015 super bowl champion.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
No he just wants Dallas to take his threats of hold out seriously (As leverage to get the deal done). It's no different then Stephen or Jerry talking to the media which they do on a daily basis.
What exactly have they said about Dez and the negotiations that could be construed as a negative? They have said time and time again that they expect him to help get them where they want to go. Meanwhile, Dez is making threats about not playing. There is a difference there.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Well, to be fair, he's not airing anything that's not already public knowledge.
Not really. He is airing his intentions and that should be directed to the club. It's not public knowledge until he airs it.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Also he's talking about his career. There really isn't a public interest on whether Donald the 44 year old pharmacist a CVS will be at work on September 13th. That being said I'm pretty sure there are plenty of people who have tweeted about wanting a raise.

It may not be the smartest policy to do so, but CVS can find a new pharmacist. What we see with Dez Bryant is the leverage of an employee that isn't immediately replaceable. It's not written in stone that you can't talk about your relationship with your employer, it's just usually wise to practice discretion because they can fire you.

If Dallas decided they didn't need Dez he'd snapped up in a minute by the future 2015 super bowl champion.
People are terminated every day because of airing there opinions in public on matters that may reflect badly on their employers. There have been a few examples very recently such as a teacher here in McKinney when she supported a police officers actions. Employers have a right to curtail public relations matters that are adverse (or presumed adverse) about their employers business or taking a public position on controversial matters. In the Bryant matter he is attempting to manipulate the employer by emanating bad PR connotations of his employer. It is not professional.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,031
What exactly have they said about Dez and the negotiations that could be construed as a negative? They have said time and time again that they expect him to help get them where they want to go. Meanwhile, Dez is making threats about not playing. There is a difference there.
I'd say any statements about having Dez play under the franchise tag are very similar threats. You act as this is some sort of a new thing. Team's use the franchise tag as leverage to try and push down the salary of the player on a long term deal. The player uses a threat of a hold out to avoid playing under said franchise tag. This isn't a new game. The Cowboys have publicly said they basically don't believe Dez will hold out, so Dez has basically come out publicly and said he will. You're just a pawn in their little game. I don't see anything wrong with what either side is doing. I just want them to get the deal done.
 
Top Bottom