Bob Sturm: Analyzing one ‘luck’ component that was a key to Cowboys’ 2014 success

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
[h=1]Bob Sturm: Analyzing one ‘luck’ component that was a key to Cowboys’ 2014 success[/h]

[h=6]Bob Sturm Follow @sportssturm Email [email]sturm1310@me.com[/EMAIL][/h]

Published: June 22, 2015 8:36 am

I think most of us agree that luck plays a major role in football. We want to quantify everything in this great sport, but there is no way to know about luck’s role in things, so we hold our breath and hope for the best.

Luck has many machinations and forms, of course. The bounce of a football after a fumble would often have to fall in this category – and you may recall that occurred a few different times in the playoff game in Green Bay. A replay review getting called correctly could also fall under the umbrella of luck. A referee seeing something correctly could as well.

But, today, let’s simply visit the “luck” component of staying healthy. In a salary cap era where you put more eggs in fewer baskets – because those eggs cost so much of your cap – it is beyond vital that we keep those precious eggs on the field and not on the injured reserve. These days more than ever, there is no depth that can replace or replicate your All-Pro performers if they should happen to be hurt. This is why the preseason games often turn into consumer shams, since no team wants to lose a precious egg in a game with no real importance. The fans are ripped off by being forced to buy tickets as part of the season ticket offering, but even they understand and almost seldom complain about this dance.

So, as we look at health, I thought we should consider the fine work of last week’s study released by FootballPerspective.com on the Cowboys leading the NFL in health in 2014. Their methodology is interesting and debatable, but by their findings, the Cowboys boasted an average of 14.5 starts per starter or 318 starts overall. This was determined by taking the top 22 most common starters and adding them up.

Offensively, with the exception of Tony Romo and Ron Leary both missing the Arizona game, and Doug Free missing seven of the 18 games (NYG, Wash, Arizona, Indy, Wash, and both playoff games – Det, GB), the Cowboys offense was healthy the entire year. That is pretty difficult to fathom, but it happened. Basically, while they did have some guys play with bumps and bruises, nobody considered a starter missed extended time but Doug Free. That is beyond remarkable, and frankly, one of those items that seems impossible to duplicate.

We spend a lot of time talking about the training staff methods and strength coaches with regards to injuries, but this is football. I am always leery of a new trainer keeping a team from ever losing games to injuries. Sometimes with football, I would argue that avoiding injuries is nothing more complex than playing Texas Hold Em and hoping you get the cards you need and avoid the ones that kill you. However, it is worth discussion that the physical, forward bull-dozing style of the Cowboys offensive line from 2014 would seem to inflict more pain than it would sustain, but that is highly subjective and difficult to prove to any real degree.

Now, the defense is a different story and that is where the methodology of this study comes into question. Here is from their findings:
Things were only slightly hairier on defense. In the secondary, safeties Barry Church and J.J. Wilcox started every game, while cornerback Brandon Carr also played the full slate. Orlando Scandrick started the final 14 games of the year at corner after being suspended for the first two games of the year.

On the defensive line, Jeremy Mincey and Nick Hayden started 16 games, Tyrone Crawford started 15, and George Selvie started 13 games (but played in all 16). The most serious injuries came at linebacker: Rolando McClain started 12 games, Anthony Hitchens started 11, and Bruce Carter started 8 games. Of course, Sean Lee also missed the entire season after tearing his ACL in May.

Now, as you can see, their methodology doesn’t really consider Sean Lee’s entire missed year (they acknowledge it, but it isn’t in their numbers at all), DeMarcus Lawrence’s missed 10 weeks or so, and Morris Claiborne not playing a snap after September. We can debate the relative merits of all 3 players, but they were certainly all heavy enough investments that we must consider them major heath blows. But, in this study (and I realize there is no way to account for this perfectly), the only defensive injuries that are considered in the math are McClain, Carter, and Durant (due to Hitchens’ playing time).

By the perspective of this study, the Cowboys had nearly a flawless health year in 2014 – and it is highly possible that many will find this unsustainable and dubious to their fortunes for 2015. But, as I see it, when you properly weight for Lee and Lawrence, in particular, you can see that having both back in 2015 is part of the reason that you can believe the Cowboys should be one of the heavyweights in the NFC this fall.

I wanted to broaden this out a bit and while using the methodology of FP.com, I wanted to see if there is any correlation between a healthy year and a playoff year. It sounds obvious, but the reason it isn’t is because not all rosters are created equal. Some years, even a fully healthy roster would not compete for much because of talent. Other years, we would argue that it certainly isn’t based on how many games are missed due to injury, but who the players are who are missing them. Also, because their methodology is only adding up the starts of common starters, we are also considering guys losing their jobs for ineffective play and not just health. This seems dubious, as well.

But, what if I took the last 10 seasons of Cowboys football, added up the total starts of the 22 most common starters and see if there is any connection? Well, here you go:



Isn’t that interesting. For all of the flaws in logic, we see that in the last 10 seasons, the Cowboys have made the playoffs 4 times and those are #1, #2, #3, and Tied for #4 seasons in health of the Top 22.

It seems obvious to conclude that the healthy Cowboys teams make the playoffs. And the Cowboys were, by this definition, the #1 healthiest team in the league. It doesn’t account for Lee, Lawrence, or Claiborne, but there does seem to be a connection to success. They could depend on the idea that the guy next to them each week would be there the following game. I think we all remember 2012 was quite the opposite, and that graphic confirms that as well. The only year they did not make the playoffs, but did stay healthy was 2010, when that single injury was to Tony Romo. Surely QB1 should be weighted differently, as most teams will drop off the map if they lose THAT guy.

Anyway, it is an interesting study that you should check out over at FootballPerspective.com.
---------

All the more reason to chalk up last year as an anomaly.

They will need a similar outcome this year to make the playoffs a comfortable task.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,268
God, 2012 was such a terrible year for us.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
[h=1]Bob Sturm: Analyzing one ‘luck’ component that was a key to Cowboys’ 2014 success[/h]

[h=6]Bob Sturm Follow @sportssturm Email [email]sturm1310@me.com[/EMAIL][/h]

Published: June 22, 2015 8:36 am

I think most of us agree that luck plays a major role in football. We want to quantify everything in this great sport, but there is no way to know about luck’s role in things, so we hold our breath and hope for the best.

Luck has many machinations and forms, of course. The bounce of a football after a fumble would often have to fall in this category – and you may recall that occurred a few different times in the playoff game in Green Bay. A replay review getting called correctly could also fall under the umbrella of luck. A referee seeing something correctly could as well.

But, today, let’s simply visit the “luck” component of staying healthy. In a salary cap era where you put more eggs in fewer baskets – because those eggs cost so much of your cap – it is beyond vital that we keep those precious eggs on the field and not on the injured reserve. These days more than ever, there is no depth that can replace or replicate your All-Pro performers if they should happen to be hurt. This is why the preseason games often turn into consumer shams, since no team wants to lose a precious egg in a game with no real importance. The fans are ripped off by being forced to buy tickets as part of the season ticket offering, but even they understand and almost seldom complain about this dance.

So, as we look at health, I thought we should consider the fine work of last week’s study released by FootballPerspective.com on the Cowboys leading the NFL in health in 2014. Their methodology is interesting and debatable, but by their findings, the Cowboys boasted an average of 14.5 starts per starter or 318 starts overall. This was determined by taking the top 22 most common starters and adding them up.

Offensively, with the exception of Tony Romo and Ron Leary both missing the Arizona game, and Doug Free missing seven of the 18 games (NYG, Wash, Arizona, Indy, Wash, and both playoff games – Det, GB), the Cowboys offense was healthy the entire year. That is pretty difficult to fathom, but it happened. Basically, while they did have some guys play with bumps and bruises, nobody considered a starter missed extended time but Doug Free. That is beyond remarkable, and frankly, one of those items that seems impossible to duplicate.

We spend a lot of time talking about the training staff methods and strength coaches with regards to injuries, but this is football. I am always leery of a new trainer keeping a team from ever losing games to injuries. Sometimes with football, I would argue that avoiding injuries is nothing more complex than playing Texas Hold Em and hoping you get the cards you need and avoid the ones that kill you. However, it is worth discussion that the physical, forward bull-dozing style of the Cowboys offensive line from 2014 would seem to inflict more pain than it would sustain, but that is highly subjective and difficult to prove to any real degree.

Now, the defense is a different story and that is where the methodology of this study comes into question. Here is from their findings:
Things were only slightly hairier on defense. In the secondary, safeties Barry Church and J.J. Wilcox started every game, while cornerback Brandon Carr also played the full slate. Orlando Scandrick started the final 14 games of the year at corner after being suspended for the first two games of the year.

On the defensive line, Jeremy Mincey and Nick Hayden started 16 games, Tyrone Crawford started 15, and George Selvie started 13 games (but played in all 16). The most serious injuries came at linebacker: Rolando McClain started 12 games, Anthony Hitchens started 11, and Bruce Carter started 8 games. Of course, Sean Lee also missed the entire season after tearing his ACL in May.

Now, as you can see, their methodology doesn’t really consider Sean Lee’s entire missed year (they acknowledge it, but it isn’t in their numbers at all), DeMarcus Lawrence’s missed 10 weeks or so, and Morris Claiborne not playing a snap after September. We can debate the relative merits of all 3 players, but they were certainly all heavy enough investments that we must consider them major heath blows. But, in this study (and I realize there is no way to account for this perfectly), the only defensive injuries that are considered in the math are McClain, Carter, and Durant (due to Hitchens’ playing time).

By the perspective of this study, the Cowboys had nearly a flawless health year in 2014 – and it is highly possible that many will find this unsustainable and dubious to their fortunes for 2015. But, as I see it, when you properly weight for Lee and Lawrence, in particular, you can see that having both back in 2015 is part of the reason that you can believe the Cowboys should be one of the heavyweights in the NFC this fall.

I wanted to broaden this out a bit and while using the methodology of FP.com, I wanted to see if there is any correlation between a healthy year and a playoff year. It sounds obvious, but the reason it isn’t is because not all rosters are created equal. Some years, even a fully healthy roster would not compete for much because of talent. Other years, we would argue that it certainly isn’t based on how many games are missed due to injury, but who the players are who are missing them. Also, because their methodology is only adding up the starts of common starters, we are also considering guys losing their jobs for ineffective play and not just health. This seems dubious, as well.

But, what if I took the last 10 seasons of Cowboys football, added up the total starts of the 22 most common starters and see if there is any connection? Well, here you go:



Isn’t that interesting. For all of the flaws in logic, we see that in the last 10 seasons, the Cowboys have made the playoffs 4 times and those are #1, #2, #3, and Tied for #4 seasons in health of the Top 22.

It seems obvious to conclude that the healthy Cowboys teams make the playoffs. And the Cowboys were, by this definition, the #1 healthiest team in the league. It doesn’t account for Lee, Lawrence, or Claiborne, but there does seem to be a connection to success. They could depend on the idea that the guy next to them each week would be there the following game. I think we all remember 2012 was quite the opposite, and that graphic confirms that as well. The only year they did not make the playoffs, but did stay healthy was 2010, when that single injury was to Tony Romo. Surely QB1 should be weighted differently, as most teams will drop off the map if they lose THAT guy.

Anyway, it is an interesting study that you should check out over at FootballPerspective.com.
---------

All the more reason to chalk up last year as an anomaly.

They will need a similar outcome this year to make the playoffs a comfortable task.
You also have to account for the fact that the depth is better.

You seem hell bent on putting asterisk on last years team.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
You also have to account for the fact that the depth is better.

You seem hell bent on putting asterisk on last years team.
I will put an asterisk on it. It was not a 12-4 team in the truest sense. We had a lot of things break our way that made it possible.

If you think that was not a "perfect storm" season, get a grip.

We can build on it. But it was certainly not a foundation season any more than the last time we had a playoff run into the second round.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,902
Younger teams tend to be healthier. Not sure I'd call that luck.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,902
I will put an asterisk on it. It was not a 12-4 team in the truest sense. We had a lot of things break our way that made it possible.

If you think that was not a "perfect storm" season, get a grip.

We can build on it. But it was certainly not a foundation season any more than the last time we had a playoff run into the second round.
I think it absolutely was a foundational season... except the biggest part of the foundation is gone.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
I will put an asterisk on it. It was not a 12-4 team in the truest sense. We had a lot of things break our way that made it possible.

If you think that was not a "perfect storm" season, get a grip.

We can build on it. But it was certainly not a foundation season any more than the last time we had a playoff run into the second round.
Agree to disagree, I don't see where we had anymore "luck than any other teams who made this type of run.

It's not like we had a bunch of nail-biting wins and we got progressively better as the season went on.

I admit the Lions win was lucky but in the same vein so was Green Bay's or Seattle's for that matter.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,075
Younger teams tend to be healthier. Not sure I'd call that luck.
Health isn't purely a luck thing. If it was purely a luck thing no one would ever refer to a player as injury prone. We may have gotten lucky with Murray, but the rest of our offense is built on players who don't get hurt much at all. Romo had his standard minor injury.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
Agree to disagree, I don't see where we had anymore "luck than any other teams who made this type of run.

It's not like we had a bunch of nail-biting wins and we got progressively better as the season went on.

I admit the Lions win was lucky but in the same vein so was Green Bay's or Seattle's for that matter.
We had some wins that were far from convincing...Houston, the 2nd Giants game.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,075
I will put an asterisk on it. It was not a 12-4 team in the truest sense. We had a lot of things break our way that made it possible.

If you think that was not a "perfect storm" season, get a grip.

We can build on it. But it was certainly not a foundation season any more than the last time we had a playoff run into the second round.
I miss homer Booze. How quickly you disappear after the season ends.
 

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,636
The thing that was different about last year was that we played our best as the season went on. There was no
typical fade in December, as we were making a move toward post season play.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
I will put an asterisk on it. It was not a 12-4 team in the truest sense. We had a lot of things break our way that made it possible.

If you think that was not a "perfect storm" season, get a grip.

We can build on it. But it was certainly not a foundation season any more than the last time we had a playoff run into the second round.
I don't even know how you can say that. It was absolutely a 12-4 season in the truest sense. We had an offense that was elite and put up stellar rushing and passing stats. We had a turnover hungry defense that was a little weak but came up big in big moments. We had the best offensive line in the league. We had the 2nd highest rated passer. We were the only team to beat Seattle in Seattle, and one of very few teams to ever go undefeated on the road in the regular season.
After a humiliating thanksgiving performance we won out in dominant fashion. Beating our division rivals in their house, routing the Colts, and humiliating every other team in between us and 12-4. What the hell could be more legitimate than that?
This is the first time in a long time where we didn't make a humiliating exit from the playoffs. The first time since 95 where we neither lost to a team we should have beaten (96, 06, 07) or been utterly thrashed (99, 03, 2010).

I thought our offensive line was supposed to be the foundation for our future success. Our last playoff entrance ended with us investing a whole bunch of resources into skill position players (Miles Austin) and utterly failing to address the issue that got us demolished in Minnesota. That's a damn big difference than doubling down of offensive line and letting Murray walk.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,268
Of course. Learning balance and game control by leaning on Murray was the biggest part of last season's foundation.
I'm not going to get into the whole OL/RB debate all over again.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,075
Of course. Learning balance and game control by leaning on Murray was the biggest part of last season's foundation.
Balance and game control was absolutely the key last year. Not sure how a back who has been on our roster for years is pointed to as the main reason for that.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,221
Now, as you can see, their methodology doesn’t really consider Sean Lee’s entire missed year (they acknowledge it, but it isn’t in their numbers at all), DeMarcus Lawrence’s missed 10 weeks or so, and Morris Claiborne not playing a snap after September.
It's silly these three don't count according to this grading system.

We had some wins that were far from convincing...Houston, the 2nd Giants game.
Every 12-4 team has close games, especially with a very average defense leaning on scrounged up depth. Dallas caught a couple of schedule breaks, but had some bad breaks too like facing relatively tough (at the time) SF, AZ, and Philly teams with Romo hurt or banged up.

I think the defense has improved trading Melton, Carter, Selvie, and Durant for Hardy, Lee, Gregory, Jones, and Wilson while Lawrence, Hitchens, Crawford, Wilcox, and maybe even Wilber continue to grow.

Pressure-wise last year's team had Mincey, Crawford, and a somewhat gimpy Melton, while this years team exchanges Melton for greater outside pressure from a part-suspended Hardy, Gregory, and hopefully a full year from Lawrence. Overall an upgrade, certainly with all three available.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,302
Been saying this all along. A ton of things went right for us to have the year that we did, especially our health on offense.

And it's crazy to say that luck wasn't a huge factor, unless you think Woicik really knows something nobody else does (and just learned it last year).
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,075
Been saying this all along. A ton of things went right for us to have the year that we did, especially our health on offense.

And it's crazy to say that luck wasn't a huge factor, unless you think Woicik really knows something nobody else does (and just learned it last year).
Other then Murray what player staying healthy was lucky? Some guys just don't miss games because their bodies hold up well. That's not luck. It's just simply the opposite of players like Sean Lee.
 
Top Bottom