Garafolo: Arbitrator in Hardy suspension appeal backed NFL in Adrian Peterson appeal

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,216
Arbitrator in Greg Hardy suspension appeal backed NFL in Adrian Peterson appeal
Mike Garafolo

FOX Sports

MAY 07, 2015 10:06a ET

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has waived his right to hear Greg Hardy's appeal of the 10-game suspension Goodell imposed on the Dallas Cowboys defensive end and has instead passed it on to Harold Henderson, the arbitrator who initially upheld Adrian Peterson's suspension, a source told FOX Sports.

The move is significant because Henderson, who is mutually appointed by the NFL and NFL Players Association, denied Peterson's appeal of his suspension back in December on the basis that Henderson believed the "new" domestic violence policy could be applied to Peterson. The NFLPA had argued Peterson's situation, like Hardy's, occurred under the "old" policy and should therefore result in a two-game suspension.

The NFLPA appealed Henderson's decision via a federal lawsuit, and Judge David Doty ruled Henderson's logic in agreeing the NFL could unilaterally impose the new policy was flawed. Doty didn't overturn the suspension; rather, he kicked it back to Henderson, the NFL and the NFLPA and instructed them to go through the appeal process again. That never occurred because the NFL then reinstated Peterson.

So Hardy and the NFLPA enter the appeal process with Doty's ruling in their back pocket. The NFL has argued -- and Henderson agreed -- there was no "old" and "new" policy, only a strengthened one. The NFL also argued there have never been minimum and maximum penalties in Goodell's personal-conduct policy, and therefore he has the right to impose a suspension of any length.
In its press release announcing Hardy's suspension last month, the NFL left out the words domestic violence.

"Commissioner Goodell noted that Hardy engaged in conduct detrimental to the league," the release stated, "and that a suspension of this length would be appropriate under any version of the Personal Conduct Policy or its predecessors.

Goodell has suspended players for significant periods of time in the past, so look for the league to argue Hardy's suspension for "conduct detrimental to the league" is in line with bans imposed on then-Titans cornerback Adam "Pacman" Jones (one season) and late Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Chris Henry (eight games).

The NFLPA will likely counter with its argument that Hardy should be suspended under the initial guidelines of the punishment handed down to former Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice (two games), as well as those of other domestic-violence offenders.

Hardy signed a one-year deal with the Cowboys in March. The total base value of the contract is $11.3 million, though much of it is tied up in per-game roster bonuses that add up to $9.25 million. For every game he's suspended, Hardy will lose a $578,125 installment of those bonuses as well as a portion of his $750,000 base salary.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
So Hardy and the NFLPA enter the appeal process with Doty's ruling in their back pocket. The NFL has argued -- and Henderson agreed -- there was no "old" and "new" policy, only a strengthened one. The NFL also argued there have never been minimum and maximum penalties in Goodell's personal-conduct policy, and therefore he has the right to impose a suspension of any length.
The problem is Henderson is now sort of bound by the Doty decision. I think that would be a losing argument for the NFL.

Their only real argument is the bullshit that he isn't being suspended for domestic violence but is instead being suspended for conduct detrimental to the league. Which basically is the NFL's way of say "Anything could be detrimental to the league and therefore we can suspend people as long as we want."
 

hstour

Brand New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2014
Messages
625
Henderson is going to have to give some and maybe go 5 games. Anything less and Hardy and the NFLPA will just go back to Doty. They will argue that changing the rule he's suspended under circumnavigates their own policy. That the League can't punish AP under the new domestic violence policy, lose, then punish Hardy under a different policy because he is in the same set of circumstance (infraction pre-dates the upgraded policy). Then, in the future, impose the domestic violence upgrade.

It's basically going to be a negotiation. Hardy/NFLPA will want 4 or less. The League will want 6 or more. So will 5 satisfy both sides?
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
Henderson is going to have to give some and maybe go 5 games. Anything less and Hardy and the NFLPA will just go back to Doty. They will argue that changing the rule he's suspended under circumnavigates their own policy. That the League can't punish AP under the new domestic violence policy, lose, then punish Hardy under a different policy because he is in the same set of circumstance (infraction pre-dates the upgraded policy). Then, in the future, impose the domestic violence upgrade.

It's basically going to be a negotiation. Hardy/NFLPA will want 4 or less. The League will want 6 or more. So will 5 satisfy both sides?
I think the NFLPA will want 2 or less. I think anything less would be a poor settlement on their part. Might as well just go in front of Doty.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,216
 

Newt

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,148
That will be a hell of a birthday present if his suspension get reduced significantly.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
2,498
Henderson is going to have to give some and maybe go 5 games. Anything less and Hardy and the NFLPA will just go back to Doty. They will argue that changing the rule he's suspended under circumnavigates their own policy. That the League can't punish AP under the new domestic violence policy, lose, then punish Hardy under a different policy because he is in the same set of circumstance (infraction pre-dates the upgraded policy). Then, in the future, impose the domestic violence upgrade.

It's basically going to be a negotiation. Hardy/NFLPA will want 4 or less. The League will want 6 or more. So will 5 satisfy both sides?
What I don't understand is it shouldn't matter if he is suspended for 10 games or not, wasn't he suspended for 15 games last year? Does that not count? How can they justify adding 10 more to what he has already served?
 

dallen

Senior Tech
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,466
What I don't understand is it shouldn't matter if he is suspended for 10 games or not, wasn't he suspended for 15 games last year? Does that not count? How can they justify adding 10 more to what he has already served?
He got paid last year. He wasn't technically suspended, he just wasn't allowed to play. That's why the logical thing to do is give him a fine equal to the game checks he collected last season. But I don't think the NFLPA or the league would go for that.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
2,498
He got paid last year. He wasn't technically suspended, he just wasn't allowed to play. That's why the logical thing to do is give him a fine equal to the game checks he collected last season. But I don't think the NFLPA or the league would go for that.
Yeah that would make more sense to me.
 
Top Bottom