Iran nuclear deal framework announced

[L.T. Fan]

Did you or did you not say we could destroy there capabilities without invading?

If so please show your grasp of how this can be done.

Google " what capabilities does the united states military have to destroy underground facilities".

 

[BipolarFuk]

Our best bunker buster, MOP, can penetrate up to 200 ft.

I'm sure they have facilities deeper than that.

 

[L.T. Fan]

Our best bunker buster, MOP, can penetrate up to 200 ft.

I'm sure they have facilities deeper than that.

I always knew you had more awareness than the Pentegon.

 

[Clay_Allison]

Never said we could end anything with bombing in fact I didn't divulge what it might be.

So how do you think we could destroy their capabilities without bombing or invasion?

 

[Clay_Allison]

Our best bunker buster, MOP, can penetrate up to 200 ft.

I'm sure they have facilities deeper than that.

A WWII super bunker buster (A Grand Slam) could probably destroy their best bunkers but we don't make those any more.

 

[L.T. Fan]

So how do you think we could destroy their capabilities without bombing or invasion?

We can according to the Pentegon, destroy their capabality with bombs but I didn't make that statement. In fact I didnt state any scenario. Thats what the ruse with Jiggy was all about. He pronounced my position as invalid before I ever said how. I actually said the US could destroy their capability without invading or relinquishing a blockade. From that he said I didnt have a grasp of the situation. The rest was dialogue about him jumping the gun on his pronounced assessement of my non statement.

 

[Clay_Allison]

We can according to the Pentegon, destroy their capabality with bombs but I didn't make that statement. In fact I didnt state any scenario. Thats what the ruse with Jiggy was all about. He pronounced my position as invalid before I ever said how. I actually said the US could destroy their capability without invading or relinquishing a blockade. From that he said I didnt have a grasp of the situation. The rest was dialogue about him jumping the gun on his pronounced assessement of my non statement.

So you accused Jiggy of misrepresenting what you meant by interpreting your statement as meaning bombing, when that's exactly what you meant?

 

[L.T. Fan]

So you accused Jiggy of misrepresenting what you meant by interpreting your statement as meaning bombing, when that's exactly what you meant?

What i accused Jiggy of is jumping to a conclussion and judging a statement before i said anything. I really doesnt matter what i may have meant or intended to say, its not right to assess a judgement on a presumption. Had I stated that the bunkers could have been bombed according to the Pentegon , he still would have made the same assessment that I had no grasp of the situation evidenced by his reply that the nukes were below ground and apparently were not penetrable. All that was concluded by him even without me making any comment at all.

 

[Kbrown]

This is riveting.

 

[L.T. Fan]

This is riveting.

I would like it to go away also so adios to this thread.

 

[Jiggyfly]

So you accused Jiggy of misrepresenting what you meant by interpreting your statement as meaning bombing, when that's exactly what you meant?

Yep.