JJT: Pressure's on for Darren McFadden

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,216
Pressure's on for Darren McFadden

Darren McFadden can't replace DeMarco Murray, but he can succeed in Dallas
Updated: March 16, 2015, 10:48 AM ET
By Jean-Jacques Taylor | ESPNDallas.com

IRVING, Texas -- Darren McFadden dealt with expectations as a Parade All-American, when he decided to play college football in his home state, at Arkansas. He was certainly subject to expectations when the Oakland Raiders made him the fourth pick of the 2008 NFL draft, a big-play running back who was supposed to resurrect the silver and black.

None of that compares to the expectations he's about to experience when the Dallas Cowboys begin their season in a few months.

In Arkansas and Oakland, McFadden was viewed positively; in Dallas, he's not. See, with the Razerbacks and Raiders, McFadden represented hope. With the Cowboys, he represents a dream unfulfilled because he's being asked to help replace DeMarco Murray -- a thankless task if there ever were one.

After all, Murray rushed for 1,845 yards on 392 carries this past season and led the Cowboys to a 12-4 record and their first NFC East title since 2009. Murray was part of the new version of The Triplets -- Murray, Tony Romo and Dez Bryant -- who would return the Cowboys to their glory days of the early 1990s.

That dream ended the moment Murray signed his five-year, $40 million deal with Philadelphia, with $21 million guaranteed.

McFadden, part of the Cowboys' Plan B, signed the next day for nearly $6 million over two years. Murray received a $5 million signing bonus; McFadden pocketed $200,000.

Half of Cowboys Nation is thrilled Murray is gone. The other half is depressed. Nearly all will agree acquiring McFadden is a downer.

It's easy to see why, if you compare him to Murray. McFadden played an entire 16-game season just once in his first seven seasons, and he gained a thousand yards once. He has had 13 100-yard games in his career; Murray had 12 the past season.

"I'm not gonna worry about what people put on me, as far as when DeMarco ran the ball for the Cowboys," McFadden said. "I'm Darren McFadden. I'm coming in to run the ball and be the best player I can be."

There's no way McFadden will be the only running back the Cowboys add to the roster this offseason. They'll add another in the second or third round, as this is considered one of the deepest running back drafts in years.

Then Garrett will let McFadden, the draft choice, Joseph Randle, Ryan Williams and Lance Dunbar compete for playing time behind one of the NFL's best offensive lines -- until the top three emerge.

Murray is gone, but the running game remains the epicenter of the Cowboys' offense, and that's not going to change. It's the Cowboys' offensive approach that allows the defense to play above its pedigree, and it keeps Romo healthy. With Romo's back injuries -- he had surgery each of the past two offseasons -- every hit might be the one that ends the 34-year-old's career.

The runner matters. Don't buy into the silliness that as long as they have two or three guys who combine for 1,800 yards, it's the same as having Murray out there.

The Cowboys need a runner that opposing defenses respect, to force them to use a safety as the eighth defender near the line of scrimmage. An ordinary running back isn't going to force teams to use single coverage against Bryant or Jason Witten.

McFadden will get a chance to be that guy, but based on his career, there's no evidence he can handle that role. He has averaged fewer than 3.5 yards per carry each of the past two seasons, but Oakland has been abject on offense the past few years, so extenuating circumstances could exist.

Oakland fullback Marcel Reece has been to the Pro Bowl each of the past three seasons, but McFadden has never run behind a Pro Bowl offensive lineman. Murray ran behind three the past season.

The Cowboys hope a better offensive line, the energy that comes from playing for the team he rooted for as a child and being on a winning squad will allow McFadden to maximize his talent.

Perhaps, on some of those runs Murray gained 20 or 30 yards, McFadden will take to the end zone because he still has top-end speed and good vision. He's not going to be physical at the end of runs -- Murray's trademark -- but he can be part of the solution to life after Murray.

Maybe, along the way, McFadden will eclipse the low expectations.
 

p1_

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
26,593
Again, why did we sign him? Certainly not as a primary. So then what?
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Again, why did we sign him? Certainly not as a primary. So then what?
Can we be sure he isn't the primary? Williams is still on the ps and Randal and Dunbar are still on the roster. If a RB is drafted who do you cut without going through training camp first?
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
Can we be sure he isn't the primary? Williams is still on the ps and Randal and Dunbar are still on the roster. If a RB is drafted who do you cut without going through training camp first?
There is currently no practice squad as of now all those guys are in the same boat.

I would not be surprised if one of these guys never makes it to training camp.

And yeah we can be sure McFadden is not the primary.:lol
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
There is currently no practice squad as of now all those guys are in the same boat.

I would not be surprised if one of these guys never makes it to training camp.

And yeah we can be sure McFadden is not the primary.:lol
Okay karnack. Does that mean it has to be Randal or a Rookie? :art
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
Okay karnack. Does that mean it has to be Randal or a Rookie? :art
What it means is that it will be a open competition and nobody is being depended on at this time.

There is nothing Karnak about that.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
What it means is that it will be a open competition and nobody is being depended on at this time.

There is nothing Karnak about that.
For the starting RB position I think you can eliminate Dunbar as a candidate. I think you can eliminate McFadden as a candidate. I am puzled as to why Williams was not more higly regarded than he was last season. Does something have to change with him to have a shot? That leaves Randal and a rookie for the shootout. Assuming there will be a rookie.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
MacFadden now apparently *is* our primary runner.

Enjoy.


Clearly they expect to hit a home run in the draft.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
MacFadden now apparently *is* our primary runner.

Enjoy.


Clearly they expect to hit a home run in the draft.
That's the unknown at this point. If your supposition is correct then the organization has reservations about Randal. He is the obvious choice based on the premise that he was #2 behind Murray last year. Since McFadden was brought in it would seem that either someone thinks he has more than what he has shown in the past or he is depth insurance pending the draft because i don't think he can outperform Williams.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
MacFadden now apparently *is* our primary runner.

Enjoy.


Clearly they expect to hit a home run in the draft.
Why do you think that? He signed the same contract as Williams and last year Joseph Randle was more productive then both of them.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,845
The runner matters. Don't buy into the silliness that as long as they have two or three guys who combine for 1,800 yards, it's the same as having Murray out there.

The Cowboys need a runner that opposing defenses respect, to force them to use a safety as the eighth defender near the line of scrimmage. An ordinary running back isn't going to force teams to use single coverage against Bryant or Jason Witten.
Even JJT gets it.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,809
Even JJT gets it.
I am amazed how many people don't.

It is not the fact that Murray was an all timer. But he did have the defenses respect. Hell, he had it in 2013 if Garrett had not been scared to trust his OL to run the ball.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
Even JJT gets it.
No, he's an idiot. If defenses double those guys we will run the ball at will. That's the point. Defenses don't give a shit about the name on the back of the guy running the ball. If he is having success they will adjust to try and stop him.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,809
No, he's an idiot. If defenses double those guys we will run the ball at will. That's the point. Defenses don't give a shit about the name on the back of the guy running the ball. If he is having success they will adjust to try and stop him.
Complete crap.

When a RB gets a ton of yards, the defenders are not talking about the five guys blocking for him. They are voting that RB to the Pro Bowl.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
Complete crap.

When a RB gets a ton of yards, the defenders are not talking about the five guys blocking for him. They are voting that RB to the Pro Bowl.
Bullshit. The defense doesn't care if the opposing team is running for 200 yards using 1 RB or 3 RBs. If the other team is running the ball successfully they will adjust to stop the run. The idea that 3 rbs combining for the exact same stats as 1 RB isn't as good is straight retarded. No defense gives a shit how you get there. If your RB position is productive it's productive.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,210
Bullshit. The defense doesn't care if the opposing team is running for 200 yards using 1 RB or 3 RBs. If the other team is running the ball successfully they will adjust to stop the run. The idea that 3 rbs combining for the exact same stats as 1 RB isn't as good is straight retarded. No defense gives a shit how you get there. If your RB position is productive it's productive.
If all three RBs only get 70 yards apiece, at least the defense can say they didn't give up a 100 yard rusher.

:fistpump
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,476
Bullshit. The defense doesn't care if the opposing team is running for 200 yards using 1 RB or 3 RBs. If the other team is running the ball successfully they will adjust to stop the run. The idea that 3 rbs combining for the exact same stats as 1 RB isn't as good is straight retarded. No defense gives a shit how you get there. If your RB position is productive it's productive.
You couldn't be more wrong.

Just because 3 guys put up the exact same numbers as Murray did, that doesn't guarantee that they'll be able to make the plays that he did.

He was a very good player who could make a play when it needed to be made. He could get that 1 yard when we had to have it. Go ask those defenders he punished with his tough running style if they didn't account specifically for him and the attributes he brought to the table.

In a tough game where 1 play can make or break the outcome, it is then when this committee approach consisting of no special guys in the group would be exposed, and that is when you'd see where that difference lies between having a truly talented player as opposed to a productive one.

I respect your opinion and generally agree with your posts, and that's why I'm surprised you'd have such a naive outlook on this subject.
 
Last edited:

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
You couldn't be more wrong.

He was a very good player who could make a play when it needed to be made. He could get that 1 yard when we had to have it. Go ask those defenders he punished with his tough running style if they didn't account specifically for him and the attributes he brought to the table.
Again you're wrong. If Dallas rushes for 200 yards with 5.5 ypc from the runningback position it doesn't matter if 3 guys accomplish it or 1. In fact one could argue the 3 guys would be more effective in the clutch situation that you mention. Because on 3rd and 1 when everyone knows you are running the ball you can pull a guy off your bench with fresh legs whose specialty is powering for a yard or two. As opposed to the RB who has carried the ball 28 times and is running on fumes. Who might be good at everything but special at none.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Bullshit. The defense doesn't care if the opposing team is running for 200 yards using 1 RB or 3 RBs. If the other team is running the ball successfully they will adjust to stop the run. The idea that 3 rbs combining for the exact same stats as 1 RB isn't as good is straight retarded. No defense gives a shit how you get there. If your RB position is productive it's productive.
If the three RBs get the same as the one RB who is going to pick up what the rest of the team had last year. It's not just making what Murray did divided by three.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
If the three RBs get the same as the one RB who is going to pick up what the rest of the team had last year. It's not just making what Murray did divided by three.
Correct, we need 3 RBs that can match what all of our RBs did last year and not just what Murray did. I mean you still needs good RBs. You can't roll out there with 3 Tashard Choice's and expect them to get those numbers. The idea that you need Emmitt Smith in order to put together a great rushing team isn't correct either.
 
Top Bottom