data
Forbes #1
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 50,457
This does mean we are bringing back the Razorback formation,right?No, if anything it will make the comp pick higher. We replaced Murray leaving with a (hopefully) cheap contract.
This does mean we are bringing back the Razorback formation,right?No, if anything it will make the comp pick higher. We replaced Murray leaving with a (hopefully) cheap contract.
Wildcat.This does mean we are bringing back the Razorback formation,right?
Not only that, but McFadden hasn't been good when he has played. His YPC over the past 3 seasons: 3.3, 3.3, 3.4. Playing in Dallas' offense as opposed to Oaklands' should give that a boost, but that is a dreadful YPC regardless.We'll be lucky if this guy can play past week 6.
I don't like it.
I'm sure it is, and I'm sure there's nothing stopping us from cutting him whenever we want.Actually, let's see how it's structured. A lot of that money might be incentives.
Only 200k guaranteed
I don't like it.
Read the post after that one.
Dont like what? Giving him 2.5 for a year with practically no bonus if we want to cut him?
The "up to" gives me hope that it is an incentive laden deal. If so, it's probably not too bad and easy to get out of if need be.
I don't like it.
Where have you seen this?Only 200k guaranteed
I figure the signing bonus is all the guarantee...but could be wrong.Where have you seen this?
Maybe, but not likely.I figure the signing bonus is all the guarantee...but could be wrong.
Archer is saying only 200k guaranteed now, so looks like you were right. This is not a bad contract at all. Very low risk, for what could be a high reward if he can stay healthy.I figure the signing bonus is all the guarantee...but could be wrong.
Make up your mind, dammitArcher is saying only 200k guaranteed now, so looks like you were right. This is not a bad contract at all. Very low risk, for what could be a high reward if he can stay healthy.