Bullshit.
It isn't just a lack of scoring in the redzone, it's an inability to get the offense rolling early.
You are misremembering. Back in 2007-2010 he got his offense rolling week in and week out. It was finishing the drives and scoring in the redzone that was the main (only, practically) problem.
How many damn times under Garrett's watch have we fallen behind by double digits early then rallied in the 2nd half with an up-tempo/no-huddle offense?
Aside from 2012?
No more than the New York Giants or Philadelphia Eagles, I'm sure.
That isn't great coaching, that's sandlot football being implemented because the team has to score a lot of points and do so quickly.
This is the same idiotic argument Clay may the other day and it's straight up false and 2012 proved it.
You are wrong. 2012 was the year we did the most "sandlotting" of any year. And the result was unprecedented inefficiency. Which is why Bob said "We need to go back to running game plans instead of abandoning them. Abandoning our game plans did not work for us." Go back and read the article again if you missed it. Sandlotting DID NOT WORK. It worked better than the game plans did in 2012, but it did not and could not achieve 2007 or, say, 2009 levels of efficiency.
Garrett has had tons of succes moving the ball up and down the field with Romo and the weapons we've rolled through here. His game plans in past years have been top-10 in generating yards almost without exception. That would not be consistently possible with only one half of productive offense each week.
Plus, you know, I can remember that what happened in 2012 was not at all what happened in previous years since I actually watched the games.
Garrett has shown no ability to create and implement a consistent and productive NFL offense. You keep pointing to those stupid worthless yards when you know damn well this offense has struggled frequently under his watch and does not have the points to accompany all those yards.
Yeah, that's what I just said. Garrett knows how to produce yards. What he's struggled with is the redzone, and converting the yards into points. Which is primarily an OL problem, because we are not able to pound it in when we get in the redzone.
Way to contradict yourself.
You're just a Garrett whore and everyone knows it. That's why nobody takes your arguments about Garrett seriously. You have zero objectivity when it comes to him.
I really don't give a shit if the same 5 people on this message board -- who are completely and obviously wrong on the subject, and who change their complaints on a daily basis, actually -- tell me I'm wrong.
You cannot argue that Garrett's 6 years of producing top offenses in terms of yardage are a product of "sandlot" play and abandoning his schemes when this year we did it more than ever and clearly had the worst offensive consistency this year of any year since Garrett has been here. It makes no sense.
Especially when -- and I'm sure you'd agree with me -- that our OL was worse this year than any year previously.
Occam's Razor dude. We all know and you agree that the OL was worse than ever this year. We all know (or we should know) that Garrett has always been able to move the ball because the stats prove it beyond argument unless you're a retard or a liar.
You are fabricating problems in an attempt to discredit him and it's as clear as day.
It's amazing that everyone basically was forced to admit the other day in that other thread that Garrett in fact could move the ball, but two days later we're going to have the same argument again because the Garrett hate is so ingrained.
That's ok. I'll do it again as long as you guys keep posting this nonsense.
