Archer: In Anthony Spencer's case, franchise tag worked out

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,216
In Anthony Spencer's case, franchise tag worked out
January, 20, 2015

By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com

PHOENIX -- Plenty of things can change between now and March 2 when the Dallas Cowboys have to place the franchise tag on wide receiver Dez Bryant, but the read-between-the-lines talk is that there is little doubt the team will use the designation.

By doing so the Cowboys must pay Bryant the average of the top-five salary-cap figures for wide receivers over the last five seasons. That figures to come in at $12.5 million to $13 million.

It's a hefty price for the Cowboys to have lock in on one player for one year. It creates a potential unhappy Bryant, who wants the security of a long-term deal and all the guaranteed money that comes with it.

A long-term deal would benefit the Cowboys, too, because Bryant would not count as much against the 2015 salary cap and potentially free them up to keep DeMarco Murray, too.

But the design of the tag is to keep Bryant from playing elsewhere.

"It's certainly a tool that franchises use to manage their roster, manage the salary cap," coach Jason Garrett said. "I think it's an important tool. I think in general you'd rather not have to use it, you'd rather have guys under contract so you can put the kind of team together that you want over a longer period of time. But there's a business part of this, and that's a tool that teams use to do their business well. Hopefully it's beneficial to different people."

The Cowboys last used the franchise tag on outside linebacker Anthony Spencer in 2012 and '13. The total cost was $19.4 million. The tag prevented Spencer from shopping his wares to other teams coming off his best season -- he had 11 sacks in 2012 -- but when he missed all but 34 snaps in 2013 he was rewarded handsomely.

"You're getting paid the top of your position, but at the same time everybody wants a long-term contract," Spencer said. "But what guarantee do you have in a long-term contract? You're only guaranteed what they give you up front. Usually the franchise tag is just about the same or a little bit more than what you're going to get for signing up front. I was fortunate to get two of them, so I ended up coming out of it ahead. I ended up making more than what I was asking for in the beginning so it didn't really affect me in a negative way."

Bryant already said he would be disappointed if the Cowboys gave him the franchise tag. He wants to be a Cowboy. The Cowboys want to keep him but they want to do so while mitigating some of the financial risk.

His options would be limited. He can sit out and not be paid. He can make due with roughly $13 million with the hopes of getting the multi-year deal at another point.

"I don't want to get into the business of all of that," Garrett said last week when asked if the team would be worried about the receiver's reaction to the tag. "But Dez is a football player that's really, really … he's a hell of a player. He's one of the best at his position and we're lucky to have him, have him here for a long time."
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
What? We burned a shitload of money that could have been spent fixing the OL, should have let the guy walk.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
What? We burned a shitload of money that could have been spent fixing the OL, should have let the guy walk.
They are trying to argue that it would have been worse had we signed him to a long term deal.

Dez is a totally different situation. Younger and more talented. Dez is the type of player that you give the big long term contract.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
They are trying to argue that it would have been worse had we signed him to a long term deal.

Dez is a totally different situation. Younger and more talented. Dez is the type of player that you give the big long term contract.
I agree. And I agree it was better than giving Spencer a big long term deal. But for the money we paid him we could have gotten a Ben Grubbs or Chris Myers to solidify the OL.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,949
I agree. And I agree it was better than giving Spencer a big long term deal. But for the money we paid him we could have gotten a Ben Grubbs or Chris Myers to solidify the OL.
Yep, which if I was going to talk franchise tag the only guy I'd consider that with is Murray. I actually think he could be a good candidate for it.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
Yep, which if I was going to talk franchise tag the only guy I'd consider that with is Murray. I actually think he could be a good candidate for it.
I agree with that, as long as we can get Dez to ink a big long term deal before the exclusive period is over.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Yep, which if I was going to talk franchise tag the only guy I'd consider that with is Murray. I actually think he could be a good candidate for it.
What would be the price tag for that move?
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
Maybe that would appease Murray with the promise of a contract next year if certain critera is met.
Or give us time to decide if a Williams/Randle/Draft Pick backfield could carry the mail in 2016.
 

Newt

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,148
I would be ok with dropping the tag on Murray if Dez was signed to a long term deal. Expensive, but it would keep us from hanging on to him way to long.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,239
I like Spencer better than most, but yeah, in what world was that such a good move for us?

Archer might as well put on his short skirt and grab his pompoms lately.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,809
Anthony Spencer for franchise money was not a good move, at all.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,596
I would be ok with dropping the tag on Murray if Dez was signed to a long term deal. Expensive, but it would keep us from hanging on to him way to long.
Last seasons franchise tag money for a RB was 9 million. I guess for one year it wouldn't be that bad but they would have to get Dez signed real quick.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,457
Hai guyz. I just paid a Lamborghini price to lease a car for a year instead of buying it.

I got a Volvo instead, but totally worth it, dude!
 
Top Bottom