Harvey: Case for Murray — it’s about value, not position

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,861
Case for Murray — it’s about value, not position
By Buck Harvey |
January 17, 2015 | Updated: January 17, 2015 10:20pm


Everything works against DeMarco Murray now, including his record-setting season. When he carried the football more than anyone in the league, his short shelf life got shorter.

This is the new era of the NFL, where running backs are considered as replaceable as the footballs they carry. Murray is no more immune than anyone when it comes to economics, wear and the changing nature of the sport.

But is it the position that matters? Or is it the player?

A guess: Jerry Jones will eventually lean toward the latter.

Today’s conference title games reflect the decline of the featured back. Bill Belichick likes runners, for example, if they fit the strategy. If not, he likes them to stand off to the side.

In the regular season, coincidentally against Indianapolis, an unknown named Jonas Gray rushed for 201 yards and the first four touchdowns of his career. The next week Gray reported late for practice and was sent home. He’s had 20 carries since.

Belichick could always find another, as well as another way to win. Last week, against Baltimore, Tom Brady didn’t hand off to a runner even once in the second half.

Then there are the Colts and their cautionary tale. Thinking they needed a premier runner, they once traded a first-round draft pick to obtain Trent Richardson. He didn’t make the trip this weekend to New England for personal reasons, and the news came with a shrug.

The other NFL game today supports Murray’s case better than Belichick and the Colts do. Eddie Lacy has been a bull at times for the Packers, and Marshawn Lynch has given Seattle what Murray gave the Cowboys.

But Green Bay is impacted more by Aaron Rodgers’ sore calf than it is by all of Lacy, and the Seahawks have had the same questions about Lynch that Dallas now has about Murray. There are no guarantees he will be back in Seattle even if he takes them to a second consecutive Super Bowl.

The Seahawks wonder what the Cowboys wonder. Lynch turns 29 in April and Murray 27 next month, and that’s considered old for this position. The Cowboys know from experience; they paid Marion Barber when he was on the way down.

It’s the reason agents say they don’t recruit running back clients out of college the way they once did. The same money isn’t there.

The Cowboys see Murray similarly, and Jones said as much last week on the Cowboys’ website. Signing both Dez Bryant and Murray, he said, “probably doesn’t look reasonable.”

Signing Bryant looks certain. The decision is about Murray, and Dallas has options. Maybe Mark Ingram, the Saints runner, comes at a discount. Maybe Adrian Peterson comes because few others want him.

Besides, with this offensive line, couldn’t a lot of runners gain yards?

But Murray didn’t just gain more yards than anyone last season, as well as more than any Cowboy has in one season. He gained the third-and-ones that Jason Garrett calls “dirty runs.”

Last week Garrett called him a complete back. But he went further in his praise.

“I think that idea of his mindset, his mentality, his demeanor, his toughness, I think that really, really helped the identity of our football team,” Garrett said. “In many ways, he established the identity of our football team.”

Other positions can do that, too. The Seattle defensive backs, for example, set the tone for that team.

How much money are they worth? Compared to the Cowboys’ J.J. Wilcox — whose only chance to tackle a Packer last Sunday was to have one accidentally run into him — a lot.

So sometimes a safety is worth a big investment. Sometimes it’s a right guard or a tight end. And sometimes, even in this era, it’s the NFL rushing leader.

Jones will get that.

bharvey@express-news.net
 

BipolarFuk

Demoted
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
11,464
Yup, pay the fumbler big bucks and watch him struggle to get to 1100 next season after getting rode into the turf.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
Some people are making the stupid mistake of forgetting the huge plays this guy made for us all year long. John Randle will remind you of it very quickly next year.

Dallas needs to draft a RB in the first or second round and hit on the pick.
 

22cowboysfan22

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
2,987
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. He doesn't even make an effort to support his argument. Value is exactly the reason why we should not sign Murray; the value gained from having an above-average RB is not worth what Murray is going to cost. Not unless he's willing to take a very team-friendly deal.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,214
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. He doesn't even make an effort to support his argument. Value is exactly the reason why we should not sign Murray; the value gained from having an above-average RB is not worth what Murray is going to cost. Not unless he's willing to take a very team-friendly deal.
Screw the article. Watch the plays Murray made for us time and again.

You can't replace that production with retards like Williams and Randle
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Screw the article. Watch the plays Murray made for us time and again.

You can't replace that production with retards like Williams and Randle
Save your breath Ravi. There are some who have been Murray haters from the start. I guess the Switzer connection is too much for them.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
Save your breath Ravi. There are some who have been Murray haters from the start. I guess the Switzer connection is too much for them.
This is such bull. Who are the Murray haters...please be specific.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
This is such bull. Who are the Murray haters...please be specific.
You havent been reading the posts? Therd has been plenty that have bashed him and wants him out. I shouldn't have to even say that much. It is obvious he has detractors beyond the value arguments.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
You havent been reading the posts? Therd has been plenty that have bashed him and wants him out. I shouldn't have to even say that much. It is obvious he has detractors beyond the value arguments.
I have been reading people understanding that you don't break the bank for a RB...does not make them haters and that they have been since he got here. That is fictional and dramatic.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
I have been reading people understanding that you don't break the bank for a RB...does not make them haters and that they have been since he got here. That is fictional and dramatic.
Just back up on this thread and read the one from.Bipo as one example.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
I have been reading people understanding that you don't break the bank for a RB...does not make them haters and that they have been since he got here. That is fictional and dramatic.
Murray wasn't liked when he was picked. I remember well all the times i had to say he was a good pick because i knew what he could do. He was depicted as an injury prone average back from the start.
 

jootep

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
604
Some people are making the stupid mistake of forgetting the huge plays this guy made for us all year long. John Randle will remind you of it very quickly next year.
Well in all fairness, he is coming out of a decade-long retirement and switching positions.
 

22cowboysfan22

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
2,987
I had no problem with Murray when he was picked. But anyone who thinks it's good value to pay Murray $7M+ a year doesn't know football.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
I had no problem with Murray when he was picked. But anyone who thinks it's good value to pay Murray $7M+ a year doesn't know football.
I have never advocated that nor have i heard anyone say that is an offer or demand.
 

22cowboysfan22

Brand New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
2,987
I have never advocated that nor have i heard anyone say that is an offer or demand.
The 4 year, $16M offer was from earlier in the season and by most accounts Murray felt like that wasn't close to his value (many articles have called it an insult). If we make the assumption that his value has gone up since midseason, it seems reasonable to guess that he's looking for a contract of $7M+ per year, which means that those advocating keeping him think he's worth it at that price.

Hell, this buffoon wants to sign him for 4 years and at least $9M per.
 
Last edited:

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
The 4 year, $16M offer was from earlier in the season and by most accounts Murray felt like that wasn't close to his value (many articles have called it an insult). If we make the assumption that his value has gone up since midseason, it seems reasonable to guess that he's looking for a contract of $7M+ per year, which means that those advocating keeping him think he's worth it at that price.

Hell, this buffoon wants to sign him for 4 years and at least $9M per.
I really dont know what he is wanting or what Dallas is willing to offer. My thoughts have been that an incentive contract may make more sense with a 4. To 4.50 M base for four to five years.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
Murray wasn't liked when he was picked. I remember well all the times i had to say he was a good pick because i knew what he could do. He was depicted as an injury prone average back from the start.
I just don't think that is true. I remember people not wanting to pick him where we did, not the player. Then you brought up somehow his connection to Switzer soured people as well? Lol

I think most would love to have him back, but you can't sign everyone.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
I just don't think that is true. I remember people not wanting to pick him where we did, not the player. Then you brought up somehow his connection to Switzer soured people as well? Lol

I think most would love to have him back, but you can't sign everyone.
So you have forgotten the injury prone label at the on set of him being picked?
 
Top Bottom