- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,216
Let's focus on the number of times the 2009 defense choked at the end of games when the offense got us the lead versus this one.
People are now choking on the blue Kool Aid.
Spoiler: This defense wins.
Let's focus on the number of times the 2009 defense choked at the end of games when the offense got us the lead versus this one.
People are now choking on the blue Kool Aid.
How many times did they choke?Let's focus on the number of times the 2009 defense choked at the end of games when the offense got us the lead versus this one.
Spoiler: This defense wins.
I'm not going to go back game by game but they folded plenty that year.How many times did they choke?
Because I remember the offense coming up short more than the defense, the Redskins and Broncos game I remember off the top of my head.
Out of the six losses only 2 teams scored over 20 points and that was the Giants and we know Romo threw multiple interceptions in those games.
Of course not but I did and it did not happen consistently.I'm not going to go back game by game but they folded plenty that year.
Are you watching the games?Of course not but I did and it did not happen consistently.
But hey never let facts get in the way.
They had a shitty play caller on offense too that didn't run the ball or know how to control the clock even with a decent offensive line.I like the character of this defense more than 2009. They had some talent, but lots of gutless and/or too passive guys on the defense to ever be relied upon. But the talent is lacking for sure right now. I just feel like the culture has changed this year, but maybe I'm drinking the kool aid.
Damnit, Where's the popcorn eating emoticon when you want it!They had a shitty play caller on offense too that didn't run the ball or know how to control the clock even with a decent offensive line.
It wasn't just the play calling. It was the design of the offense and the feature back. Barber was the 3rd (tee hee) best back on our team that year but he had more carries than Felix and Tashard combined (with less yards to show for it).They had a shitty play caller on offense too that didn't run the ball or know how to control the clock even with a decent offensive line.
Nobody is disputing the culture has changed but that 2009 defense was very good and the numbers showed they came up big throughout the season.I like the character of this defense more than 2009. They had some talent, but lots of gutless and/or too passive guys on the defense to ever be relied upon. But the talent is lacking for sure right now. I just feel like the culture has changed this year, but maybe I'm drinking the kool aid.
I'd rather have the '09 defense with Marinelli and the attitude of the '14 defense.Yeah, I'm with ravid. I would rather have this defense than 2009's.
Yeah, but you can't have both.I'd rather have the '09 defense with Marinelli and the attitude of the '14 defense.
I already posted if I had to choose, then it would reluctantly be 2009 because of the superior talent.Yeah, I'm with ravid. I would rather have this defense than 2009's.
Yes, the Philly shut out was terrific. The Washington shutout was less impressive, given the retardation level of the opposition. The defense held fine, and we can also thank the level of competition.So how is ending the 2009 season with the only consecutive shutouts in Cowboys history gutless? The 09 defense was GREAT.
Dallas won TOP in that game, BTW.Obviously if Sidney Rice, Brett Favre and, Adrian Peterson are left on the field long enough they're going to start putting up points. But the defense wouldn't have folded if the offense hadn't failed to play at a professional level.
Obviously the defense was flawed. It wasn't the 02 Bucs or 85 Bears. But it was a championship caliber defense. Sidney Rice isn't the greatest WR, but Brett was one of the best QBs at making his WRs look great. And 09 was one of Brett's best career years. Sidney Rice was just playing his Javon Walker that year. I remember the long TD to Rice and Newman was in good coverage for it. That really was a play that couldn't have been prevented.Yes, the Philly shut out was terrific. The Washington shutout was less impressive, given the retardation level of the opposition. The defense held fine, and we can also thank the level of competition.
Dallas won TOP in that game, BTW.
I get it. The Cowboys OL was a sieve that really screwed things up for us. Marc Columbo and Doug Free got abused and Tony Romo seemed to fumble away every sack.
But there is no excuse for the Dallas defense making Sidney Rice look like a Hall of Famer. That part was completely gutless, and it's what I remember most.
Good as that defense was, it was overrated. People are acting like it some kind of all-timer laced Doomsday IV or V. No way. Not stout without safety help and poor in coverage vs. quality QB's.
Sensabaugh was running stride for stride and didn't even contest the pass, so yeah it could have been prevented. Spencer or Ware got some edge pressure, but there was nothing up the gut allowing Favre to step up and take a shot to the sideline.I remember the long TD to Rice and Newman was in good coverage for it. That really was a play that couldn't have been prevented.
It was made worse by pedestrian ILB's and safeties. Good, but not great.The 2007-2009 defenses were really good, but they could have been elite with a real NT.
I think the ILBs would have been more effective if the line was better at keeping blockers off of them.It was made worse by pedestrian ILB's and safeties. Good, but not great.