Archer: Putting Tony Romo in MVP talk

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,435
Putting Tony Romo in MVP talk
November, 13, 2014

By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com

IRVING, Texas -- When ESPN's NFL Nation handed out its midseason Most Valuable Player, quarterback Tom Brady earned 16 votes. Running back DeMarco Murray was second with seven votes, followed by quarterback Peyton Manning with five votes.

Four others received one vote.

None were named Tony Romo.

After what we have seen from the Dallas Cowboys in their past two games, Romo's name will be in the MVP race should the Cowboys make the playoffs, win the NFC East or do even better than that.

Murray's candidacy will be an uphill battle, despite his strong numbers. It is a quarterback-driven league. Brady has led the New England Patriots' resurgence. Manning set the NFL's touchdown record. Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers has been otherworldly since he told everybody to R-E-L-A-X. Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, who received one of the midseason votes, had the Pittsburgh Steelers rolling until last week.

But what about Romo?

His value was never more evident than it was at Wembley Stadium. Playing with two fractures in his back, Romo threw for 246 yards and had his third three-touchdown performance of the season in the 31-17 win against the Jacksonville Jaguars. It was a gutty performance.

Maybe Murray and Romo will end up cancelling out each other's MVP chances if the Cowboys continue to win, but Romo will have to also fight his past. No matter what he does, there is a nagging, "Well, talk to me when the games matter most" faction out there among his critics.

Never mind the comeback wins. Never mind the statistics. With Romo, it is all about what he hasn't done and, to some, will never do. He walks a balance beam each week with his detractors heckling at him from the stands or nipping at his heels on each step, and if he falls, it is to depths reserved for quarterbacks nowhere near as talented as Romo.

The Cowboys have lost winner-take-all season finales the past two seasons. Romo didn't play in last season's finale because of a herniated disk, but he put the Cowboys in position to make the playoffs with a fourth-quarter, fourth-down touchdown pass in Week 16 against the Washington Redskins. Five days later he had back surgery, and it was Kyle Orton's turn to throw a late-game interception.

In the final five regular-season games in each of the past three seasons, Romo has 32 touchdown passes and 10 interceptions. But a late-game interception against the Packers last season, the three-interception game vs. the Redskins in 2012 and the season-ending loss to the New York Giants in 2011 stand out more for those who believe Romo always comes up short.

Romo leads the NFL in completion percentage (68.8 percent), is fourth in passer rating (107.2) and tied for seventh in touchdowns (18) this season. He has 2,244 passing yards, which is 12th in the league, but he missed one game. And Murray leads the NFL in rushing, so Romo's passing numbers will be low.

But where does "value" come in discussing the MVP?

Everybody saw what happened when Romo could not play against the Arizona Cardinals on Nov. 2. The offense imploded. We can speculate what would happen if the Patriots lost Brady, the Broncos lost Manning, the Packers lost Rodgers and the Steelers lost Roethlisberger. We have seen the Patriots go 11-5 without Brady. We have seen the Packers stay afloat without Rodgers.

We can speculate what would happen if the Cowboys lost Murray as well, though the team does believe Joseph Randle can succeed enough to make the running game work well enough. Instead of the running game being almost all about Murray, the Cowboys would split the work with Randle and Lance Dunbar.

The Cowboys' season would be lost without Romo, and that is the definition of "most valuable." He will have six more games to prove it.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,051
Eh. I'm not sure that a player deserves MVP based on having a horrible backup.

Romo is a valuable player, but how bad we are without him says more about Weeden.

I think it's hard not to say Murray is a better candidate.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
1998 NFL MVP was Terrell Davis. I think we have an approximate dynamic here.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
Eh. I'm not sure that a player deserves MVP based on having a horrible backup.

Romo is a valuable player, but how bad we are without him says more about Weeden.

I think it's hard not to say Murray is a better candidate.
That is one view but I have always thought of this award as being (or should be) for a player who is recognized as being the primary reason a team accomplished what they did. The votes usually however turns into a stats war.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
That is one view but I have always thought of this award as being (or should be) for a player who is recognized as being the primary reason a team accomplished what they did.
In that case the ol should get it over Romo
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,248
1998 NFL MVP was Terrell Davis. I think we have an approximate dynamic here.
The Broncos won games with Bubby Fricking Brister at QB. Shannon Sharpe said they basically gave him the keys to the sports car and asked him not to crash it.

Romo's creativity and ability to look off safeties is a key part of the Dallas offense.
 
D

Deuce

Guest
The Broncos won games with Bubby Fricking Brister at QB. Shannon Sharpe said they basically gave him the keys to the sports car and asked him not to crash it.

Romo's creativity and ability to look off safeties is a key part of the Dallas offense.
But the key reason this team is going to make the playoffs is because of the running game. If this team was in Tony's hands, we'd be 8-8...again.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
The OL didn't overcome the opponent when Romo took a thrashing from the Skins and Cards.
The ol is not to blame for Romo being Haslett's bitch, and they were fine in the Cards game as well we just had a subpar qb
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,248
But the key reason this team is going to make the playoffs is because of the running game. If this team was in Tony's hands, we'd be 8-8...again.
As would be any team that failed to effectively run the football. That holds true for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning too. You can't consistently win in the NFL without a running game.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
As would be any team that failed to effectively run the football. That holds true for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning too. You can't consistently win in the NFL without a running game.
I'd say Saints (2009) and Packers (2010) won it without a running game to speak of, but it's the exception. Since then those teams have been best known for their quick exits from the playoffs after being defeated by running teams like the Giants, 49ers, and Seahawks.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,375
I'd say Saints (2009) and Packers (2010) won it without a running game to speak of, but it's the exception. Since then those teams have been best known for their quick exits from the playoffs after being defeated by running teams like the Giants, 49ers, and Seahawks.
The Saints had a pretty decent solid running game in 2009. It was not overwhelming but provided good balance.
 

townsend

Banned
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,377
The Saints had a pretty decent solid running game in 2009. It was not overwhelming but provided good balance.
Damn, you're right, I'd always equated that (dat?) Saints team to pass happy, but they had 2100 yards and 21 TDs on the ground. It was just spread across 4 different RBs.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,248
I'd say Saints (2009) and Packers (2010) won it without a running game to speak of, but it's the exception. Since then those teams have been best known for their quick exits from the playoffs after being defeated by running teams like the Giants, 49ers, and Seahawks.
Booze pointed out the Saints have always emphasized the run, and GB won with Starks and Jackson getting a lot of carries to balance out the pass attempts.

Here are Starks carries in the playoffs

Philly: 23 123 5.35
Atl: 25 66 2.64
Chi: 22 74 3.36
Pit: 11 52 4.73

The real anomaly is the Superbowl itself, which was played at Cowboys stadium in ideal passing conditions vs. a hurting Steelers secondary. Green Bay was aided by Pittsburgh's Roethlisberger trying to out-pass Aaron Rodgers and throwing a pick six for his trouble.

Peyton Manning himself, arguably the greatest passer of all time, did not win the Superbowl until the Colts rededicated themselves to running behind Rhodes and Addai in 2006.

Tom Brady hasn't won a Superbowl since becoming a pass-happy QB.

Nobody passes at the percentages Dallas did in 2013 and wins anything.
 
Top Bottom