Sturm: Email Bag: The DeMarco Murray Conundrum

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,271
Email Bag: The DeMarco Murray Conundrum


Since there is no Sunday game to dissect this morning, I wanted to take advantage of the calm before tonight’s storm and address something that came up in last week’s DMN chat and elaborate just a bit.

Here is the question from one of our readers and my chat-length answer:

=====

Question: What would you rather do: Pay Murray 4 yrs at 45 million with 20 mill guaranteed and the option to get out of the last year OR spend your first round draft pick on Todd Gurley if he fell to you.
Bob Sturm: I would have to decide on Murray before I knew if Gurley would fall to me. Also, Gurley would not fall to a team that might draft really, really late in Round 1. So, I would love to replace DeMarco with Gurley, but given what I can control, I would franchise Murray next spring for 1 year.

=====

This exchange generated a large amount of email feedback that made me wonder if I needed to be more clear as to state my case as it appears that DeMarco and his future is one of those polarizing topics for many Cowboys’ loyalists.

First, a few facts to enjoy: Even though many of the NFL’s Running Backs have played 8 games already, DeMarco Murray still holds a 147 yard lead on his closest competitor (Arian Foster, also just 7 games) in the NFL rushing race. He also has carried the ball 41 times more than anyone (Foster, again) and has touched the ball 21 more times than anyone (Matt Forte, 209-188).

Le’Veon Bell of Pittsburgh has pulled ahead of Murray in Total Yards from Scrimmage yesterday, but he has played his 8th game. The lead 14 yards, so barring a real disaster tonight, Murray should be back in charge of that statistic well before halftime.

Murray is certainly being compared to the best in the sport, but he is also dealing with be compared to himself. This is his 4th year in the league and it is conceivable that before October ends he could have career highs in every category. Now, he would need 31 carries tonight for 209 yards, but from what we have seen so far, neither is off the radar completely. But, even if we go extremely conservative with his performance, he will have both marks before the bye week. Career highs in every category by the 10th game is pretty much a given.

And, his rookie contract ends in 2014. That contract was valued at $2.97m for 4 years after being selected in the 3rd round which gave the Cowboys the fantastic value of having Murray for less than $750k per season. Well, that bargain is about to expire and his value is about to explode (we can assume).

Now, he has a very complex deal to work out, because as everyone who is reading this is more than well aware, Murray and his style do not seem to suggest that he can be a durable work-horse for the next 5 years (like Emmitt Smith was once upon a time).

Tonight is the 56th game of his career and he will play in his 45th. This is better than Bo Jackson’s pace, but it does speak to why people don’t want to pay running backs at a premium – because the shelf life of the elite runner is generally short.

Which brings other email responses that stress the only thing that is “elite” in the running game is the offensive line. The idea held by many appears to be that any number of backs could have great success behind this offensive line and that Murray is merely the beneficiary of having great space being handed to him by the 3 1st-round picks in front of him (and their friends).

As I have said a number of times, I disagree with that. Maybe that point will be tested if Murray misses 3 weeks in 2014 and Lance Dunbar or Joseph Randle can duplicate this work load, but I warn anyone with this position that the job Murray does is not limited to running yards. This is not fantasy football where it is all measured with statistics. For me, the job he does as a complete back can not be over-stated. He is very smart and dependable in the passing game to always identify and execute the blocks in the passing game to protect Tony Romo when he is stepping into key throws. Murray has a very high success rate in this capacity that his mates at RB absolutely don’t have.

Then, with his running style, I think he always is decisive and able to get that extra yard when there is nothing. He turns losses into no gain. He turns no gain into +2. And that is very valuable in this offense. Further, he punishes defensive backs over 3 hours to where they don’t want to deal with him any longer by the 2nd half.
But, what do you pay him?

You may remember this graphic from last Wednesday’s Morning News Story by Brandon George that shows just how many deals are coming free after this season:




When you see how many names on here, you can see how vital it is to be careful with both your available cap space (limited) and your targets of first priority.

Dez Bryant has to be 1st and foremost on this list, with Murray and Rolando McClain next on my list (and I am sure I am not alone). Then comes figuring out the plan at Right Tackle and so on.

The Cowboys simply must find a long-term solution with Bryant. I assume he has a very high self-valuation based on the fact that a deal is not already done (see: Tyron Smith), so there has to be compromise on both sides, but this is why I am back at Murray.

Assuming that Bryant gets done, then I am using the franchise tag on Murray. I don’t wish to do a long term deal with him if I have to go to Forte (4 years/$30.4 million), Foster (5/$43.5m), or LeSean McCoy (5/$45m) numbers. I would be delighted if he would settle for a deal in the 5/$25m range (with a nice guarantee), but I imagine he has his sights on one of those deals that puts him at $7-8m a year, not the $5m I want to do.
The franchise tag would actually be $9.5m or so (based on last year, but it could drop – depending on Adrian Peterson’s deal being intact or not in Minnesota), but it would also only be for the 1-year, which gives you “durability insurance”.

The timing with the franchise tag is dependent on Bryant’s deal, because of the two, you have to feel that Bryant is the one you must keep at all costs. Murray is very valuable, but I could replace him more easily in the draft than Dez.

As for Todd Gurley, there were several readers who promised me that Gurley won’t go in the 1st round because “RBs don’t go in the 1st round anymore”. I will bet against that being true with him unless he has a horrid Combine. He is going in the top round (unless my eyes deceive me) so the odds of him getting the Cowboys pick are not great anyway, and the Murray decisions would all be made before the draft. You would have to know your plan with DeMarco before you have any idea what you can do in the draft. Just assume that Gurley will be somewhere else for his NFL career.

If I am king (which I am absolutely not), I extend Bryant during the bye week (somewhere in the range of $14m a year for 6 years and $30m guaranteed would be the going rate for this type of deal) which allows for the franchise tag on Murray. There won’t be much space for other big purchases (sorry to Henry Melton, Bruce Carter, and Doug Free), but I am going to make sure that Murray is in a Cowboys uniform in 2015 for sure. He is too valuable to this whole operation.

Hopefully that cleared up my stance on the entire issue. Now, let’s get ready for the action on the field tonight.
 

Texas Ace

Teh Acester
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,480
I'm thinking the best thing to do is just franchise Murray next year.

That way you don't have a hole at the RB position and you don't commit to him longer than you want to. If he turns around and has another great season, then it makes giving him a 4 year deal a no-brainer.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,302
I still bet he gets hurt before the year is over, complicating things further.

I wouldn't franchise him, though.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
I'm thinking the best thing to do is just franchise Murray next year.

That way you don't have a hole at the RB position and you don't commit to him longer than you want to. If he turns around and has another great season, then it makes giving him a 4 year deal a no-brainer.
How is it a no-brainer? you still have the question of when his production starts falling off and he is a year older with more wear and tear.

I am not saying don't franchise but if I do I am drafting his replacement this year.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,082
I'm thinking the best thing to do is just franchise Murray next year.

That way you don't have a hole at the RB position and you don't commit to him longer than you want to. If he turns around and has another great season, then it makes giving him a 4 year deal a no-brainer.
Not sure it gets any easier to sign him long term if he has back to back to back 1000 + yard seasons.

The real question is going to be the cap. I'd be interested to see what the figure for the franchise tag on a RB will be. The thing that's always tempting about the long term contract is you usually get short term cap relief in comparison to the franchise tag. Meaning a deal that averages 7 per year over the long haul may only cost you 3-4 in the first year.

I'd have to see what happens this year before I'd get into anything with Murray. Plus Dez's deal needs to get done first. No question about it.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,271
How is it a no-brainer? you still have the question of when his production starts falling off and he is a year older with more wear and tear.

I am not saying don't franchise but if I do I am drafting his replacement this year.
Yep, this is what I do. I franchise him and replace him in the same year.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,271
Why franchise him then?
Because you can use the year working in the new guy. Plus the odds of him having one more good year on his wheels are much better than the odds of him having 3 more good years.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,082
Because you can use the year working in the new guy. Plus the odds of him having one more good year on his wheels are much better than the odds of him having 3 more good years.
He is only 26, I don't know if I'd bury him that quickly. My only concern is that 400+ carries this season just ruins him permanently as it has most NFL RBs who have carried the ball that much in a season.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,271
He is only 26, I don't know if I'd bury him that quickly. My only concern is that 400+ carries this season just ruins him permanently as it has most NFL RBs who have carried the ball that much in a season.
Yeah, that's what I mean. I saw a chart a couple of weeks ago that showed how many RBs had even decent years after carrying the ball 400 times the previous year, and there were very few.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Because you can use the year working in the new guy. Plus the odds of him having one more good year on his wheels are much better than the odds of him having 3 more good years.
Maybe I don't understand but why pay out a year's pay if you have already decided you are going to get rid of him. Why not just find the replacement in the off season and send him down the road.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,271
Maybe I don't understand but why pay out a year's pay if you have already decided you are going to get rid of him. Why not just find the replacement in the off season and send him down the road.
Why not ride him for one more year and see what he has left. I don't think the franchise money is very high for RBs (I could be wrong on that), so you aren't out a lot of money.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
Why not ride him for one more year and see what he has left. I don't think the franchise money is very high for RBs (I could be wrong on that), so you aren't out a lot of money.
It's actually pretty high for a rb at 9.5mil but if we could find room wouldn't mind going that route so whatever rookie we get has time to get better pass-blocking/learning plays/etc.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,271
It's actually pretty high for a rb at 9.5mil but if we could find room wouldn't mind going that route so whatever rookie we get has time to get better pass-blocking/learning plays/etc.
Didn't realize it was that high, but I still think I go that route.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
It's tough to extend him too far, particularly with the Dez deal looming. If they do extend I'd hope it is a 3 year deal...21 mil total, with performance/health stipulations.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Didn't realize it was that high, but I still think I go that route.
That's probably more than he would get with a contract notwithstanding any guarenteed money.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
It's tough to extend him too far, particularly with the Dez deal looming. If they do extend I'd hope it is a 3 year deal...21 mil total, with performance/health stipulations.
This is more in line with what I would do.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,542
Considering how our offense is run right now I could argue that RB is our biggest need after the DL, and because of that I'd be fine drafting a RB as high as the 2nd whether we re-sign Murray or not.
 
Top Bottom