- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 19,705
We are still waiting.Well then put an "lol" or emoticon that indicates that. I had to learn to do that because people couldn't understand my acerbic humor over text, email, etc.
Oh...
We are still waiting.Well then put an "lol" or emoticon that indicates that. I had to learn to do that because people couldn't understand my acerbic humor over text, email, etc.
Hey hey, let's keep Muslims out of this, bud.Well then put an "lol" or emoticon that indicates that. I had to learn to do that because people couldn't understand my acerbic humor over text, email, etc.
Not necessarily....but I find it laughable Goodell has no concerns about calling players out, but Jones hasn't been mentioned once- and we haven't even talked about one of the head officials partying on the PT Barnum Express Bus with strippers and booze. So, I guess Goodell is OK with that "image" too, huh?They are not good for the NFL, but should he be suspended or penalized somehow now?
Suspending an owner for six games is a joke, and does nothing but perform a little lip service to the uninformed. You want to make a statement that has some weight behind it? Suspend them for an entire league year, barring them from all offseason activities, to include free agency and the draft. Six games during the season does what, not allow them in to their luxury box for a few games? Big deal.Suspending Jones for six games would send a huge message about how seriously the NFL values its image.
While we'd all love to see Jones get Steinbrennered, I couldn't see that happening short of a criminal indictment and conviction. A six game suspension from all Cowboys business to an attention hound like Jones amounts to major punishment.Suspending an owner for six games is a joke, and does nothing but perform a little lip service to the uninformed. You want to make a statement that has some weight behind it? Suspend them for an entire league year, barring them from all offseason activities, to include free agency and the draft. Six games during the season does what, not allow them in to their luxury box for a few games? Big deal.
It serves no purpose other than bruising his ego. And even that is no big deal. He's not loosing any money during the suspension, like a player does. And he and the team is suffering no consequences, business wise. It's not like there are a whole lot of important roster moves that shape a team's future are done during the season. Like I said, a waste of time and nothing but lip service.While we'd all love to see Jones get Steinbrennered, I couldn't see that happening short of a criminal indictment and conviction. A six game suspension from all Cowboys business to an attention hound like Jones amounts to major punishment.
I don't think it would be a waste of time at all, and if anyone needs his ego bruised it's Jones.It serves no purpose other than bruising his ego. And even that is no big deal. He's not loosing any money during the suspension, like a player does. And he and the team is suffering no consequences, business wise. It's not like there are a whole lot of important roster moves that shape a team's future are done during the season. Like I said, a waste of time and nothing but lip service.
It would be bigger news if an owner with a highly respected public image were involved.These pictures of Jerry would have been a bigger embarrassment to the NFL if Jones wasn't already such a joke.
But if this charge has legs and sticks, the Commish can do quite a bit. Suspending Jones for six games would send a huge message about how seriously the NFL values its image.
Yeah I thought maybe she got some go away money at most. Essentially sometimes it's cheaper to pay a settlement then it is to pay your attorney.You gotta love 2014. You can suck off a billionaire and get paid in the neighborhood of $150,000-1,000,000 five years later.
Yeah I thought maybe she got some go away money at most. Essentially sometimes it's cheaper to pay a settlement then it is to pay your attorney.
Turns out the case was just dismissed instead which is pretty simple when dealing with a statute of limitations. I wonder what the argument in response to the motion to dismiss was.
Charlotte is his daughter.I wonder how Charlotte takes all of this. Her husband, already into his 70's, (though the pictures happened a bit before then) is still out f'in around with women half his age. Do you guys think she's GILFing it up, doing her own thing as well? Or is she sated by the fact that he'll be dead soon?
(These are the things I wonder....)