Sturm: How Bad Is The Cowboys Defense?

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
[h=2]Saturday, August 16, 2014[/h] [h=3]How Bad Is The Cowboys Defense? [/h]

The elephant in the room for the new Dallas Cowboys season remains this defense and the scary showing from 2013 combined with the subtractions from that crew. It has to have most bracing for the worst.

But, are we being too harsh? Are the issues being overstated?

Let's examine how we got here and if this is a fair projection or a pessimistic view this morning.

You may recall that last summer, I examined the 2012 team by statistical ranking in the wake of their scheme change. You may review it by clicking here. From June of 2013:
They spent the offseason changing the coaching staff and the scheme of the defense and asking much of their 3-4 personnel to now simply switch to the 4-3. Most NFL experts would argue that this is a very unwise endeavor as players are often identified as one or the other on draft day and yet now the Cowboys are asking their entire Front 7 on the defense - who were all drafted because they were tailor-made for the 3-4 scheme to not only learn but perform at a high level on the 4-3.
Much of this is also mitigated by the fact that the Cowboys did run a very multiple and versatile front with Rob Ryan in the last few years and that they have very talented players who should work in any scheme, but still, it is not a sure thing this will work when they have 6 of their projected 7 starters as hold overs from the old scheme. Only newcomer Justin Durant, the projected SAM linebacker in Monte Kiffin's scheme has ever played a snap in a 4-3. That is a shocking reality of what the Cowboys are about to try to do.
On the other hand, what you are about to see are the statistics that the Cowboys defense has amassed in 2012 with their old scheme. Now remember, health had a ton to do with another disappointing effort from the defense - so much so that the firing of Rob Ryan doesn't really seem fair based on 2012 performance - but, make no mistake; we should not be too bothered with the Cowboys trying a new defensive strategy moving forward. Trouble is, we know from experience that scheme doesn't make the team. Players do.
Special ones. And, honestly, I have significant doubts that the Cowboys can be a special defense based on a scheme that requires a team to get pressure with only the front 4 (The Tampa 2 seldom blitzes) and is based on the cognitive skills of safeties to orchestrate the entire secondary. But, I will let the coaches sort through those issues in a long camp and see where it goes.
The object of the game is not to prove that I am right and that Jerry Jones might have been guilty of a silly, predictable decision. Although, at least from a predictable outcome standpoint, the 2013 season went about as poorly as most thought it would outside the Jones family bus.

They changed scheme, but did not upgrade talent at all. They attempted to fit square pegs into round holes and then had the audacity to blame Monte Kiffin for not being able to take Rob Ryan's personnel and to fit it in his scheme which was very different altogether.

They wished to fix something that was poor - largely due to injuries and lack of depth - without addressing the injuries and lack of depth. Then, when injuries and lack of depth (and lack of real quality in too many places) caused them to have a 2013 which the evidence below will actually argue was worse, they seemed to blame Monte Kiffin and the tactics. This, of course, seemed to be what they did in 2012 with Ryan and were unable to come close to improving upon. I felt sympathetic for Ryan in 2012 who had no Sean Lee or Jay Ratliff for 10 games each, and no Bruce Carter or Orlando Scandrick for 5 games each, no healthy DeMarcus Ware for the first time in his career, and of course the Josh Brent incident with a month to play. To say that he felt he also had mitigating circumstances would likely be an understatement.

Of course, Ryan had a personality that may not have fallen easily in line with normal proceedings around Valley Ranch and that, if I were to wager, did not help his blame game results quite like Mr Kiffin's long-time relationship with Mr Lacewell and Mr Jones might have helped.

That said, let's view the 2013 season through the lens of "it surely cannot get worse than 2012, right?"

I have chosen 15 major stats for the 2013 defense where the unit ranked 26th or worse. Basically, these are the categories where the Cowboys were in the bottom 20% (or lower) in the entire NFL.

The first batch will simply be the results of the pass defense:

Statistic '13 Dallas-RankNFL AvgPO Avg'12 Dallas
Opp QB Rate96.0 - 26th86.081.994.7 - 29th
Opp QB Rate - Blitz117.4 - 32nd85.785.4106.5 - 29th
20 Yd Passes Allowed71 - 32nd515152 - 20th
Yards After Catch2368 - 30th194318901926 - 25th
Net Pass Yds/Game286.8 - 30th235.6231.6203.3 - 19th

As you can see, that is a lot to take in. I listed 4 measurements for each category: The 2013 Cowboys, the 2013 NFL Average, the 2013 NFL Average for the 12 playoff teams, and the 2012 Cowboys.

As you can see, the Cowboys regressed in all 5 passing categories which include the opposing passer rating, the opposing passer rating when blitzed, big passes (over 20 yards), Yards surrendered after the catch, and finally, net passing yards per game. Again, in every single category, the Kiffin 4-3, was even worse than the defense they wished to replace.

Side Note: Do you remember the talk after the Chicago game last year? Jerry went on the radio after the Bears humiliation and basically threw down the public order of more blitzing - even though Monte Kiffin had never made blitzes a large part of his defense and also having a stripped down secondary. Well, anyone with a Statistical database knows (and the above chart proves) that nobody is worse than the Cowboys at pass defense when blitzing. It is brutal. I just am not sure the General Manager is aware of this, given his public demands last season. In fact, from 2010-2013 (since Wade Phillips was out and Jason Garrett named head coach), no team has been worse against the blitz than the Cowboys and it isn't even close (Jacksonville is a very distant 2nd worst). Dallas has conceded a QB rating of 107.3 when they blitz over 620 blitzes, including 42 TDs and only 9 INTs and a stunning 8.82 YPA. You cannot blitz if you have poor safety play.

Next, here are 5 categories around the rushing defense. Surely, if you are that poor through the air, at least you can stop a run, right? Oh, boy.


Statistic '13 Dallas-RankNFL AvgPO Avg'12 Dallas
Rushes + Completions52.5 - 29th48.847.547.6 - 11th
Run Yards Per Game128.5 - 27th112.9109.2125.2 - 22nd
10 Yd Runs Allowed65 - 31st474453 - 22nd
1st Down Run Avg4.87 - 27th4.314.254.82 - 28th
% of Runs 4+ Yds47.8% - 29th42.4%43.5%42% - 7th

The 5 categories here are Rushes + Completions which best measures game control from a non-time of possession standpoint (can my defense get off the field?), Rush yards allowed, big runs (10 yards or more), average runs on 1st down allowed, and what percentage of total rushes get at least 4 yards?

Again, brutal.

They went backwards in every single category. This new scheme which featured an improved tactical plan (according to those in charge) actually fell back into the bottom 5 across the board. Can you imagine a defense that is 32nd in big passes allowed and 31st in big runs allowed? The 2013 Dallas Cowboys, ladies and gentlemen.

Finally, here are 5 over-view categories that sum up the defense in key plays in the red zone and 3rd down, and of course, the biggest one - points allowed by the opponent's offense (subtracting any defense or special teams points).


Statistic '13 Dallas-RankNFL AvgPO Avg'12 Dallas
Off Pts Allowed425 - 30th346305359 - 22nd
Yds Per Play RZ3.38 - 29th2.892.793.02 - 23rd
3rd/Short (less 4yds)77.1% - 32nd57.2%56.7%55.9% - 18th
3rd/Long (more 6yds)33.9% - 31st25.6%22.7%25.3% - 16th
RZ Scoring Efficiency64.5% - 31st55.5%54.4%54.5% - 18th

In these 5 categories, the Cowboys showed MAJOR regressions. They were very, very poor on 3rd and short (32nd) and 3rd and long (31st). Yikes. Then, they allowed more yards in the red zone per play than ever before and more touchdowns per possession than any team but the Houston Texans.

They weren't bad in every category - they were tied for 13th in takeaways, for instance. They were 3rd in fumble recoveries. But, the positives are very few and far between. And too few to balance the issues.


So, as we sit on the verge of the 2014 season and hear the similar refrain about "they can't possibly be worse than they were last season", I am reminded that after last year when Rob Ryan was blamed and the team did not replenish the talent very well, we might have been barking up the wrong tree.


Monte Kiffin has been stripped of his duties and Rod Marinelli is the next man up. He has to figure this out without DeMarcus Ware (Salary cap), Jason Hatcher (Free Agency/Salary Cap), Sean Lee (ACL), DeMarcus Lawrence (broken foot until November), and Orlando Scandrick (suspension until October). Add to that the questionable status of Morris Claiborne (shoulder), Anthony Spencer (knee), and Henry Melton (groin, knee) and we are looking at a defense which is being discussed as the worst in the league without too many prospects of major improvements on the depth chart.


I have said a few times on the radio that this 2014 is as poorly as I have felt in over a decade about a Cowboys season. If you want my reasons as to why (beyond the dicey health of the franchise QB), it would be found primarily on this page.


The defense looks absolutely like a major disaster waiting to happen. There is always a feeling of fresh hope and Rolando McClain could supply some of that, along with upticks from youngsters like JJ Wilcox, Kyle Wilber, and Tyrone Crawford.

But, I am not sure most people realize how far they must travel to get to even mediocre.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
Sturm knows his stuff but he writes a novel with every article. I find myself trailing off about a 1/3 of the way in. It an overblown world smorgasbord of info.
 

GShock

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
6,399
Sturm knows his stuff but he writes a novel with every article. I find myself trailing off about a 1/3 of the way in. It an overblown world smorgasbord of info.
I really enjoy his stuff. And this is terrifying for the "defense can't get any worse" crowd.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,905
I really like it too. Not enough media get into the x and o aspect of the game. It's the "he looked good, he looked bad" stuff, without further explanation (like 99 percent of articles) that makes my eyes glaze over.
 

UncleMilti

This seemed like a good idea at the time.
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
18,002
Whether its a novel or overblown, the fact is anyone who thinks this Cowboy defense is going to be much better than last year is in for a very disappointing season.

I'll say it again...look for a record in the 4-12/5-11 range.

The defense is simply going to be that bad.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,063
Whether its a novel or overblown, the fact is anyone who thinks this Cowboy defense is going to be much better than last year is in for a very disappointing season.

I'll say it again...look for a record in the 4-12/5-11 range.

The defense is simply going to be that bad.
If they can go 8-8 with that last year, I guess people think it simply cannot be worse.

But yeah, this is pretty much a 5-11 defense. As bad of a defense as I have seen since the Campo days.

Unless we just come out and play flawless offense to outscore everybody, it is going to be bloody.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
If they can go 8-8 with that last year, I guess people think it simply cannot be worse.

But yeah, this is pretty much a 5-11 defense. As bad of a defense as I have seen since the Campo days.

Unless we just come out and play flawless offense to outscore everybody, it is going to be bloody.
The 2001 Campo defense was light years beyond this one.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
I just think the offense is too good for the team to finish with 4 or 5 wins. The defense is horrid for sure, but this offense is going to be special.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,641
I just think the offense is too good for the team to finish with 4 or 5 wins. The defense is horrid for sure, but this offense is going to be special.
I agree. The line seems to be fixed and they are showing a commitment to run. 9 or even 10 wins despite the defense?
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
I agree. The line seems to be fixed and they are showing a commitment to run. 9 or even 10 wins despite the defense?
Hard to pick against 8-8. Now we have seen some special offenses like NO and Indy overcome less than stellar defenses in recent memory, but they never had as bad of a defense as we have.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,641
They could have had 9 or 10 last season if they would have run the ball more.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
They could have had 9 or 10 last season if they would have run the ball more.
The same message came out last year...that we would run the ball more with a new OC. Same results. Our new OC is not exactly a guy known for leaning on the run either.

I always have hope, then reality sets in as the season progresses.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
They could have had 9 or 10 last season if they would have run the ball more.
I agree but I have my doubts they will stick with the run when the games start counting
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,700
They could have had 9 or 10 last season if they would have run the ball more.
That's right. A lot of folks are overlooking that fact. Even with their horrid defense last season they were in most of their games and close to being division champs. All you hear is how bad the defense is.
 

GShock

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
6,399
That's right. A lot of folks are overlooking that fact. Even with their horrid defense last season they were in most of their games and close to being division champs. All you hear is how bad the defense is.
Eh. There are always at least 2 losses that could easily be wins, and 2 wins that could easily be losses.

The defense was NFL-historically bad last season, and it has the same coaches and less talent this year.

To overcome that, we will have to rely on an aging QB with a bad back and a penchant for throwing back-breaking 4th quarter interceptions, an offensive coaching philosophy that thinks Romo throwing 50 times a game is a good thing, and a RB who has never made it through an entire season healthy.

We are a missed blitz pickup from a dumpster fire.
 

Carp

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
15,194
That's right. A lot of folks are overlooking that fact. Even with their horrid defense last season they were in most of their games and close to being division champs. All you hear is how bad the defense is.
If frogs had wings they would not bump there ass every time they jumped. We can talk about all these scenarios where they ran more and won more games, but the record is still the record.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,265
The defense was NFL-historically bad last season
I keep seeing this, but was it really this bad? I know it was Team-historically bad, but there have been some God awful bad defenses over the years. This D was as bad as the 76 Buccaneers and others? I'm seriously asking... I'm too lazy to look it up.
 

jsmith6919

Honored Member - RIP
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
28,407
I keep seeing this, but was it really this bad? I know it was Team-historically bad, but there have been some God awful bad defenses over the years. This D was as bad as the 76 Buccaneers and others? I'm seriously asking... I'm too lazy to look it up.
Are Cowboys Really ‘Worst D In NFL History’? A Stat Study
By Mike Fisher | CBSDFW.com, 105.3 The Fan
December 29, 2013 2:11 PM

ARLINGTON (CBSDFW.COM) – “The Dallas Cowboys have the worst defense in NFL history.” That sentence had been spoken, written and repeated with such frequency that it’s now likely to be etched permanently on the figurative gravestone of this 2013 season — especially because of what many expect to be a playoff-hope-killing burial on Sunday night in Arlington at the hands of the visiting Eagles.
The criticism ignores a couple of positives (Dallas, for instance, has 27 takeaways, putting it on pace to almost double last year’s total of 16) and is based on yardage allowed. And there isn’t much positive to argue there: The Cowboys rank last in the league in total defense, allowing 418.6 yards per game. They have already set franchise records for total yards allowed (6,279) and passing yards allowed (4,360).
But a true football-analytics person understands that due to changes in the game over the course of the Cowboys franchise’s 54 years of existence, those numbers need to be “weighted’’ in accordance with the rest of the NFL.
Let’s call it “The Inflation System.’’
Is a Cowboys season with 16 games going to include more yards allowed than seasons with 14 and 12 games? Of course. Is a sport in which free agency didn’t come into existence until 20 years ago going to experience some statistical upheaval? Certainly.
And how about this for a literal game-changer:
In 1960, the per-team NFL average for passing attempts and yards – 26 attempts for 170 yards.
In 1970, the per-team NFL average for passing attempts and yards – 27 attempts for 161 yards.
In 2013, the per-team NFL average for passing attempts and yards – 35 attempts for 236 yards.
So you think a 2013 NFL defense is likely to give up more yards than its ancestors?
Absolutely.
Cowboys radio-broadcast statistician Bob Thomas pitches in on this project to note that to truly measure this year’s awful Dallas defense (and it is that, inarguably) it must be measured not against the yardage given up by others over history but rather using a system that essentially takes into consideration “inflation.’’
The dollar is different as the years go by; a candy bar used to cost 10 cents but now costs a dollar … but because of inflation, today’s candy bar isn’t really “10 times as expensive.’’
Same with stats. The best measurement of what the Cowboys are doing is to gauge their failings against the league averages throughout the years.
There’s your accurate system: Enter the average NFL rushing and passing per game by season and compare them to the Cowboys averages in the same categories.
The Cowboys enter Week 17 at minus-69.4 yards compared to this year’s NFL average.
The Cowboys of 1960, 1962, and 1963 were worse.
Other editions of the club: In 2000, Dallas was minus-13.6. In 2010, Dallas was minus-15.8. Last year, Dallas was minus-8.3 for 2000 comparisons.
The best year in franchise history for yardage allowed using “The Inflation System’’: 2003, when the Cowboys were 64.8 yards ahead of the NFL average.
Meanwhile, this year’s team is currently the third-worst passing defense in franchise history, with the 1962 and 1963 clubs ranking as poorer. And the 2013 club has the seventh-worst rushing defense in team history. (By the way, “The Inflation System’’ has the 2013 Cowboys offense as the 13th-best passing and fifth-best rushing teams in franchise history.)
“The Dallas Cowboys have the worst defense in NFL history’’?
Not really. Common sense suggests that an 8-7 team is probably doing more things right than a near-century of seasons filled with clubs that finished with two, one or zero wins. It’s also easy to cite the 1950 Baltimore Colts here, as they went 1-11 while allowing 38.5 points per game at a time when the league average was 22.9 points allowed. Those poor Colts allowed 50 points in four games and surrendered 70 points twice.
So in terms of yardage, this year’s Cowboys aren’t the franchise’s poorest; right now they’re only the fourth-worst in franchise history. And if you factor in takeaways (coordinator Monte Kiffin’s focus), points per possession (the sort of advanced stat just now gaining popularity) and wins (what it’s all about), it’s really not true that “the Dallas Cowboys have the worst defense in NFL history.”
What’s true is that to many, it feels that way. Which, pending the outcome of Eagles-at-Cowboys, might be indictment enough.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
37,905
I keep seeing this, but was it really this bad? I know it was Team-historically bad, but there have been some God awful bad defenses over the years. This D was as bad as the 76 Buccaneers and others? I'm seriously asking... I'm too lazy to look it up.

I could be wrong but I don't think they were Nfl historically bad, just Dallas historically.

Which of course means there's room to get evwn worse. :tippytoe
 
Top Bottom