Machota - Woodson: Garrett needs full control

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,436
Darren Woodson: Jason
Garrett needs full control; ‘his thumb print is not on this organization’​

By Jon Machota
jmachota@dallasnews.com
12:17 pm on April 25, 2014 |

Former Dallas Cowboys All-Pro safety Darren Woodson turns 45 today. The five-time Pro Bowler hasn’t lined up in Dallas’ defensive backfield since 2003.

And the team has struggled to replace him ever since.

During a recent interview, Woodson, an ESPN NFL analyst, explained that the Cowboys have had difficulty replacing him because they haven’t had the “emphasis on the position.”

“When you need to fill a position, until you absolutely focus on that position and that need, then you’re not going to do it,” Woodson told TheLandryHat.com’s Dan Krupinsky. “Until they get in that mindset that ‘We need to go get a safety’ and isolate two or three guys in the first round, they’re just not going to find that guy that they want.”

From 1993 to 1999 Woodson was teammates with Jason Garrett. Garrett has compiled a 29-27 record over his three and a half seasons as Cowboys head coach and the team is without a playoff berth. When asked about the progression Garrett has made as a coach, Woodson focused on the amount of control Garrett has over his football team.

“I think the one thing, the one issue I have with the whole scenario, is that Jason Garrett does not, and let’s call it what it is, I don’t think he has full control of this organization,” Woodson said. “His thumb print is not on this organization. It’s, of course, Jerry’s fingerprints all over the place as far as the organization, the team, and in the locker room.

“What I would like to see more so is Jason Garrett be that guy who steps up and within that locker room, he’s the most respected person in that locker room. That’s what we want to see. If you ask any player in that organization who ‘the guy’ is, they’re probably going to say Jerry, to be honest with you. And then Jason. But you can’t be that way.

“It has to be Jason first, and then the rest of the organization. The rest of the coaches and then the GM, owner and so on. I think the only way that Jason Garrett can actually put his imprint on this football team is if they win football games and the leaders within the team actually rally behind him. And that’s it.”

Another interesting take form the Woodson Q&A was that he’d like to see four-year veteran safety Barry Church “take full control of that secondary and be the leader, instead of Brandon Carr.”

Woodson didn’t give any further explanation on that topic.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,086
Garrett already has as much control as any coach is going to get here. If he can't work with that, that's on him.

And honestly, I can't understand why anyone would think he's earned it or has demonstrated that he would be successful with full control.

Few coaches league wide get full control anyway.

If there's a problem with our setup (and there is), it's WHO does have the control, not that Garrett doesn't.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,502
Garrett already has as much control as any coach is going to get here. If he can't work with that, that's on him.

And honestly, I can't understand why anyone would think he's earned it or has demonstrated that he would be successful with full control.

Few coaches league wide get full control anyway.

If there's a problem with our setup (and there is), it's WHO does have the control, not that Garrett doesn't.
Ding ding mf'ing ding.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
Garrett already has as much control as any coach is going to get here. If he can't work with that, that's on him.

And honestly, I can't understand why anyone would think he's earned it or has demonstrated that he would be successful with full control.

Few coaches league wide get full control anyway.

If there's a problem with our setup (and there is), it's WHO does have the control, not that Garrett doesn't.
Garrett may not do any better with full control but any HC coach should be afforded the opportunity to exercise it.
 

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,502
Garrett may not do any better with full control but any HC coach should be afforded the opportunity to exercise it.
Of course he should, but it will never happen here.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,591
Garrett already has as much control as any coach is going to get here. If he can't work with that, that's on him.

And honestly, I can't understand why anyone would think he's earned it or has demonstrated that he would be successful with full control.

Few coaches league wide get full control anyway.

If there's a problem with our setup (and there is), it's WHO does have the control, not that Garrett doesn't.
True.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,250
Jerry Jones can win, and he's proved it. He just needs a football GM to guide the building of the team.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
The success rate is proven. HC/GM's eventually can't get out of their own way.
They get too tempted to make decisions to try to save their jobs in the short term that hurt the team in the long term, especially trading up too much and drafting for need instead of BPA.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
Disagree. I think it's better to have a HC and a GM separately.
I didn't mean full control of the organization. I meant full control of the team. For further clarity the HC should have total charge of every aspect of the game and players on the roster.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
I didn't mean full control of the organization. I meant full control of the team. For further clarity the HC should have total charge of every aspect of the game and players on the roster.
I think he should have the power to cut players but he shouldn't have the power to draft or sign them, though he should be able to veto free agent acquisitions.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
I think he should have the power to cut players but he shouldn't have the power to draft or sign them, though he should be able to veto free agent acquisitions.
Players to be drafted are not on the roster.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
They are after they get drafted. If you had full control of the roster that would imply, in my mind, the power to build that roster.
That's fine but not what I intended. I think once the player is on the roster he is under the control of the HC. I didn't intend to circumvent the responsibilities of the GM. I didnt say full control of the roster rather players on the roster
 
Top Bottom