No, no. Forget that.It's not realistic to expect your first rounder to be an impact player? GTFO of here.
Actually, LT said impact player.You said impact player, not perennial all pro. And to say he did NOT impact our OLine would be ignorant. No need to move the goalposts from the original starting point.
Right, he did say that. Then you said it was not realistic. He countered that it was if you go BPA, then you stated it wasn't possible last year. That's when I said Fred was an impact first rounder last year and you upped the anti to perennial all pro. Then followed with the gibberish above.Actually, LT said impact player.
Just STFU.Its semantics...
If I say that Frederick is an impact player for you, will you feel good enough about yourself that we can get back to the actual discussion?Just STFU.
I never said any such thing, and there is certainly a long list of players I'd prefer over Ealy.I love how pick 16 is the same as 30 in Schmitty's mind. Getting a player who can be more than a role player is IMPOSSIBLE at pick 16, when Bryant was picked at 24.
I'll still take him over Ealy. He's a #1 WR in this league.Mike Evans isn't Dez Bryant.
Just STFU.
Weak troll attempt.
Punch. Line.
That was no troll attempt. That was just laughing at you.Weak troll attempt.
Even weaker troll attempt.That was no troll attempt. That was just laughing at you.
Again.
With the way you love to change things and move goal posts around, there's no point in trying to "refute" anything.So I guess NoDak agrees that some years you can't do any better than a Travis Frederick type player in the back of the first round since he has brought nothing to the table to refute it. Good to know.