- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 53,200
He was a good player and I think he would be a big upgrade over Hayden at one of the DT spots.Your starting DT along side Aaron Donald by week 9.
He was a good player and I think he would be a big upgrade over Hayden at one of the DT spots.Your starting DT along side Aaron Donald by week 9.
Awesome.We would get him and Crawford back. No need for Donald now.
That wouldn't be a bad thing.Awesome.
Calvin Pryor in the first ba-bee!!!!!1
It wouldn't be a great thing either.That wouldn't be a bad thing.
It would if we were still able to get D-lineman later in the draft. The dude is a stud. If you don't agree then you may want to look up more information on the guy. His attitude will make him a cornerstone safety of some franchise.It wouldn't be a great thing either.
I would too but if he isn't an option in the first I may consider Pryor over some of the other possible D-lineman.I'd take Donald over Pryor.
Brent being counted on to do anything is not "fine".That would be fine with me.
Counting on him to start is silly. Saying you wouldn't give him a look is also silly. What's the harm in looking? He isn't a poisonous apple type player who will destroy the team and he has more talent then most bottom feeders on NFL rosters. Hell if anything he seems to be a well liked player who the team may rally around a bit.Brent being counted on to do anything is not "fine".
First off, who the hell knows what kind of shape he's in. And I am not ready to say he could play at the level we need as the 1-T in this defense.
Saying he is better than what we had in Hayden isn't saying a lot. I would prefer to move on from the dumbass.
I would say killing his teammates is pretty destructive to the team.Counting on him to start is silly. Saying you wouldn't give him a look is also silly. What's the harm in looking? He isn't a poisonous apple type player who will destroy the team and he has more talent then most bottom feeders on NFL rosters. Hell if anything he seems to be a well liked player who the team may rally around a bit.
It's not like he murdered his team mate intentionally. I clearly do not condone his behavior but it seems like the rest of the team is supportive and would welcome him back. All of course contingent to him being able to actually function as a player.I would say killing his teammates is pretty destructive to the team.
That was mostly a joke, but in all seriousness I don't want him back.It's not like he murdered his team mate intentionally. I clearly do not condone his behavior but it seems like the rest of the team is supportive and would welcome him back. All of course contingent to him being able to actually function as a player.
Given the fact he was still doing stupid things even after he was responsible for the death of his best friend, I doubt his ability to function as a regular human being, much less football.It's not like he murdered his team mate intentionally. I clearly do not condone his behavior but it seems like the rest of the team is supportive and would welcome him back. All of course contingent to him being able to actually function as a player.
Yeah because you want him to spend the rest of his life in jail.That was mostly a joke, but in all seriousness I don't want him back.
Yeah because you want him to spend the rest of his life in jail.
So how long does "constantly evaluate" mean?
I never said a thing about "counting on him". I said I'd be fine if we ended up with Donald and him starting. Meaning we have a blue chip player and one that is at least serviceable.Brent being counted on to do anything is not "fine".
First off, who the hell knows what kind of shape he's in. And I am not ready to say he could play at the level we need as the 1-T in this defense.
Saying he is better than what we had in Hayden isn't saying a lot. I would prefer to move on from the dumbass.