2026 NFL Draft Chatter

Chocolate Lab

Free Phil Mafah!
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
30,039
I mean, I know the answer, but why do these supposedly knowledgeable sites put out stuff like that? Two edges in the first when we seem to have hit on Eze and our LBs and safeties are a wreck?
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,973
Give me Jacob Rodriquez in whatever round it takes.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,614
I've been thinking about the "DE" situation quite a bit and I think the move is to take someone like Howell or Bailey who are undersized and not full-time 4-3 DE's, but are basically guaranteed to be impact edge rushers in passing situations.

Between one of them, Ezeiruaku, Williams and Osa you'd potentially have a group that could mimic what the Broncos have.

The key is that you'd have to be smart about using them situationally, re-sign Clowney, get another JAG somewhere who can absorb punishment on run downs and use Ezeiruaku and the rookie the way you should've used Parsons.

That means 60-70% of the snaps while limiting their snaps in clear running situations.
 

Chocolate Lab

Free Phil Mafah!
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
30,039
Besides the obvious personal tragedy, that's what sucks about Kneeland. I still think he could have been that run down guy. I think the injuries were the main reason he struggled this year.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
60,831
I've been thinking about the "DE" situation quite a bit and I think the move is to take someone like Howell or Bailey who are undersized and not full-time 4-3 DE's, but are basically guaranteed to be impact edge rushers in passing situations.

Between one of them, Ezeiruaku, Williams and Osa you'd potentially have a group that could mimic what the Broncos have.

The key is that you'd have to be smart about using them situationally, re-sign Clowney, get another JAG somewhere who can absorb punishment on run downs and use Ezeiruaku and the rookie the way you should've used Parsons.

That means 60-70% of the snaps while limiting their snaps in clear running situations.
With Quinnen Williams, Osa and Clark in the middle I actually think that makes a ton of sense. Get yourself a stable of great pass rushers on the outside and you could have a really bad ass front 7. Of course we don't know what LBer will look like but we will find out over the second half of the season.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
60,831
Any of these first round corners worth getting excited about? I just don't see one that I get excited about in the first. The problem is if you don't take one in the first, you're not taking one until the fourth.

Personally I'd consider dropping the second first to the second round for a future first round pick. It's probably too early to say that but it just makes a lot of sense to me to parlay the extra pick into more extra picks in the future.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,614
Any of these first round corners worth getting excited about? I just don't see one that I get excited about in the first. The problem is if you don't take one in the first, you're not taking one until the fourth.

Personally I'd consider dropping the second first to the second round for a future first round pick. It's probably too early to say that but it just makes a lot of sense to me to parlay the extra pick into more extra picks in the future.
I like Terrell and Delane but not enough to take them top 20, if the Packers pick ends up at like 28 I'd consider them there.

Definitely curious to see how they test/measure though.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
60,831
I like Terrell and Delane but not enough to take them top 20, if the Packers pick ends up at like 28 I'd consider them there.

Definitely curious to see how they test/measure though.
Truth is I don't even need a stud corner. Just give me a really good solid corner is can tackle and cover his man well. Usually I'd say I can find that in the second or third round. But we don't have those picks.
 

Chocolate Lab

Free Phil Mafah!
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
30,039
Revel is Jerry's "first round corner" anyway. Even if he looks terrible the rest of the year.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
60,831
Revel is Jerry's "first round corner" anyway. Even if he looks terrible the rest of the year.
I'm hopeful for Revel but dude obviously had some set back during camp. I'm just not confident his knee will ever be right. Or he is going to miss so much time it might not matter. Even if Revel is good, Bland has sort of been shit and Diggs is going bye bye. So you still need another corner. Unless you think Carson or someone is going to be any good.
 

Cujo

Trapped in Purgatory...
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
6,299
Truth is I don't even need a stud corner. Just give me a really good solid corner is can tackle and cover his man well. Usually I'd say I can find that in the second or third round. But we don't have those picks.
I agree. I wouldn’t take one in the first unless we traded down and picked up at least a 3rd. With all the rules favoring wrs, I just don’t think you’re getting enough bang for your buck if you take one in the top half the first round.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,614
If Revel looks like he can halfway play over the last two months of the season I won't be overly worried about CB.

If he looks decent we can definitely get by with him, Bland and some combo of Elam/Carson/whoever if we have a kick-ass pass rush and healthy safeties.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
46,707
Even if Revel is good, Bland has sort of been shit and Diggs is going bye bye. So you still need another corner. Unless you think Carson or someone is going to be any good.

Yep, this is the thing. Even if Revel is good (and that's a huge if) they definitely need at least another guy.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
46,707
It would be nice if they spent a couple of bucks in free agency and removed the necessity of getting an impact contributor from the draft. Then they could just relax and let the draft come to them. Imagine.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,614
Unless Wilson and Overshown look really strong we basically could draft the BPA on defense at any position outside of DT, where we obviously have way too much invested to turn around and spend a 1 on it. I don't think safety is a strong possibility because of the talent, although of course I'd take Downs if he was there.

So in all likelihood we'll probably need impact players at DE, LB and possibly even CB, with only two 1's and no 2/3. In my mind that means they need to do something in FA (like sign Quincy Williams), because even though I like the first round talent at all three of those positions, I don't want to feel like we have to trade down just so we can add numbers.

Other random thoughts based on some stuff I've been wondering about plus the Brugler rankings:

-David Bailey is my guy and I don't think anybody can move me off it. He's never going to be able to set the edge in a 4-3 like you want but truthfully I don't give a fuck. He's guaranteed to be a very good if not elite edge rusher, add him to Ezeiruaku, Williams and Osa and you're going to have an elite pass rush at some point in 2026. Figure out the run defense with JAG's and/or vets like Clowney and Thomas.
-Keldric Faulk looked like a guaranteed top 5ish pick when I saw him against Alabama last year but he's been really quiet this year. Part of that is schematic like Brugler says, part is Auburn sucks which demoralizes players, but he also just looks really inconsistent. I wouldn't complain at all if we took him around 12-15 but my gut tells me it'd be better to take a sure fire guy like Bailey who has no real warts aside from size/run defense, which is something a good coach can work around.
-If McCoy tests well I'll be worried about our braintrust falling in love with him. He's one of the few guys with prototypical size and was excellent last year, but I'd rather wait on a guy like Delane or Terrell with our second 1st.
-Assuming our first pick is around 12-15, with the other being around 18-24, I feel like we should go DE with the first pick (Bailey/Faulk/Bain) and then LB/CB with the second (Allen/Styles at LB, Terrell/Delane at CB).
-Reese and Downs are the obvious outliers that you take immediately if they're available.
-If we do want a prototypical 4-3 DE I like Zion Young and Quincy Rhodes, but guys like them lose some of their appeal to me because they're better fits on the inside in clear passing situations, and we already have Williams/Osa slated for that.
-If Love is there at our first pick we have to consider him. I wouldn't love going RB with the defense in the situation it's in but he'd most likely be the clear BPA and would be a seamless fit with Williams.
-Not interested in OT at all even though it might be a massive need. It's just a weak overall class with lots of guys who might be better suited on the inside. Fano has disappointed a bit and I don't think he'd be worth taking in the top 15 for us.

Kind of a strange class because you have 2 QB's with barely any starting experience who are at the top of the class, plus a guy like Mendoza who is just kid of meh as a prospect. But you know teams are going to roll the dice there no matter what, so they're going to go high unless they tank the rest of the year.

Then you have a mixed bag of position prospects with no surefire blue chip guys except Downs and Reese, both of whom play positions that teams generally avoid high in the draft.

Put all that together and I think it's going to make for a very unpredictable first round.
 
Top Bottom