Moore: Marshall Faulk believes “everything is fine in Jerry’s world.” Or not.

Cotton

One-armed Knife Sharpener
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
120,611
Marshall Faulk believes “everything is fine in Jerry’s world.” Or not. His thoughts on Cowboys coaching staff and Scott Linehan
By David Moore
dmoore@dallasnews.com
2:08 pm on January 30, 2014 | Permalink

Add Marshall Faulk to the long list of critics who is baffled by the way owner Jerry Jones and head coach Jason Garrett have structured the Cowboys coaching staff.

“It’s just another way for the Cowboys to get around saying they didn’t fire a coach and that everything is happy in house,’’ said Faulk, the Hall of Fame running back who is now an analyst for the NFL Network. “But you bring in another play caller.

“It was like last year. Everything was fine but (Bill) Callahan was going to call the plays instead of Garrett. But everything was fine. And then everything was fine when Wade (Wilson) went up to the booth. That was fine, too.

“Everything is fine in Jerry’s world and that’s what we’re going to stick with. Because they’re successful.’’

Sarcasm was dripping from Faulk’s last comment, in case you were wondering.

Faulk’s final season with St. Louis was in 2006. That happens to be Scott Linehan’s first season as the Rams coach.

What does Faulk think of the Cowboys new passing game coordinator and play caller?

“We had one meeting together,’’ said Faulk, who spent the final season of his career on injured reserve.

Still, he has to have an opinion of Linehan.

“You had a 5,000-yard passer, you had the best receiver in our game and you missed the playoffs,’’ Faulk said of Linehan’s past season in Detroit as offensive coordinator. “I mean, we could give it to (Jim ) Schwartz, but Schwartz didn’t call an offensive play or a defensive play. That’s just how it goes.

“I’m not knocking Linehan. He had a lot of success there, he did a lot of great things, but obviously it didn’t get them to the point of where Schwartz is still the head coach. You have to look at the offensive coordinator and defensive coordinator and say OK, what happened.’’

Faulk can say he isn’t knocking Linehan, but it sure sounds like he is.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,359
Detroit was 6th in offense. Not sure why he would be blamed for Detroit's failure.
 

UncleMilti

This seemed like a good idea at the time.
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
18,008
Detroit was 6th in offense. Not sure why he would be blamed for Detroit's failure.
And the Cowboys O ranked up there too depending on what stat you want to use. Even at that, I don't think you'll find anyone overly impressed with our offense.

Linehan isn't a great hire....period.
 

L.T. Fan

I'm Easy If You Are
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
21,703
And the Cowboys O ranked up there too depending on what stat you want to use. Even at that, I don't think you'll find anyone overly impressed with our offense.

Linehan isn't a great hire....period.
Right now a good hire would be an improvement.
 

junk

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
580
Detroit was 6th in offense. Not sure why he would be blamed for Detroit's failure.
13th in PPG which is the offensive stat I'm most interested in. Should fit right in with Garrett's middle of the pack scoring offenses.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,359
13th in PPG which is the offensive stat I'm most interested in. Should fit right in with Garrett's middle of the pack scoring offenses.
I actually like PPG most as a barometer to judge an offense but the problem is points off turnovers and special teams need to be eliminated and I have no way to do that. I mean Dallas was fifth in PPG last year. It would be laughable to call our offense top 5 last year.
 

junk

Not So New Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
580
I actually like PPG most as a barometer to judge an offense but the problem is points off turnovers and special teams need to be eliminated and I have no way to do that. I mean Dallas was fifth in PPG last year. It would be laughable to call our offense top 5 last year.
Sure, there are ways to do it. It just involves the work of going back through game logs.

I've searched for a metric like that. I really can't believe anyone has it.

I suppose even that would be somewhat in question since the offense could generate points based off of field position.

I still think, even with the additional turnovers this year, the defense being so bad didn't really help the offense out. It did get better in the RZ.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,264
It's mostly the personnel, though in Dallas play-calling was suspect. No one outside of Dez is getting open for Dallas, and Romo' deep ball also went late-career Danny White. The whole offense lacks speed.

Detroit and Dallas have the same avg yards per play of 5.7, but Detroit despite a -12 turnover ratio (Dallas was +8) had 1102 total offensive plays compared with just 957 for Dallas. That's like two games worth more plays for Detroit. Time of possession Detroit had the ball 3 more minutes per game than Dallas. Dallas refused to run the ball despite averaging 4.5 yards per carry (336/586 run pass ratio; 36.44% run). Detroit averaged only 4.0 yards per carry and maintained a 445/634 run-pass ratio (41% run).

A big part of it was the defense forcing Dallas to keep passing. Dallas' opponents scored 51 touchdowns while Detroit's scored 38.

Get guys who can stop the other team, team speed and RB depth on offense and you'll make whoever the OC is look real good.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,359
He took the hit for Stafford's regression.
I have never been a big Stafford fan. I think he is overrated as a QB. The guy has a cannon for an arm but he has very little touch or accuracy. He is a QB that will put up big numbers but I don't think will ever be more then a "barely made it to playoffs" QB.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
50,525
I have never been a big Stafford fan. I think he is overrated as a QB. The guy has a cannon for an arm but he has very little touch or accuracy. He is a QB that will put up big numbers but I don't think will ever be more then a "barely made it to playoffs" QB.
Aside from the cannon part, many would think you're talking about Romo.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,359
Aside from the cannon part, many would think you're talking about Romo.
On short to intermediate throws I think Romo has excellent touch. The problem with Romo is he is streaky. When that man is in full pimp mode his ball is about as accurate as you could ever want it. When he is off his game on the other hand it can be ugly. I think Stafford is clearly a touch below Romo in terms of NFL QBs.
 

1bigfan13

Your favorite player's favorite player
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
27,215
He took the hit for Stafford's regression.
It sounds like Stafford, like Romo, has too much power and needs an OC that will hold him accountable.

I don't follow Detroit closely but there was some talk of Stafford having too much control of the offense. They also mentioned that he was part of the the screening process and actually sitting in on interviews during the Lions HC search.

Stafford hasn't earned that type of input. That type of input should be reserved for GOATs like Brady and Manning.
 
Top Bottom