The Outrage Thread
- Thread starter skidadl
- Start date
Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,155
"tax cuts for the rich," don't make poor people poorer.
That would only be true if wealth were a closed circuit, but it's not.
Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,155
"They printed all that money and then what did the people do? They spent that money because they needed to spend that money."
...
Then proceeds to argue against Trickle Down Economics.
Dipshit needs to buy a clue, he just contradicted himself in his rapid fire theory of what's wrong with the country. Really he is just reciting a bunch of bad things that happened and he doesn't know why.
Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,155
Yes, poor people need to spend their money on necessities, like rent and food. That's why giving them money only enriches the landlords and the grocers (warning: I'm simplifying. Obviously poor people spend their money on quickly devaluing consumer electronics and automobiles as well).
I'm not in favor of corporate hand outs (often generalized as "Trickle Down Economics," which is only partially true), but giving money to poor people only funnels the money back to the landed gentry. Like that fucking genius just pointed out happened during Covid (yet the retard can't put two and two together as to why "Trickle Down Economics," isn't as bad as he's making it out to be).
Only wealth creation makes our society better (and sadly, companies generate most of the wealth cause they are efficient at it). The more wealth there is, the more of it there is that poor people can get their hands on easily. Sadly, that means the rich get a lot of it too. But this is why the "wealth gap," doesn't matter. The gap only matters if more is not attainable; but given that most assets are duplicable (not land, that amount is static, but you can make more cars or iphones in an unlimited fashion, essentially), the only thing that matters is making enough that everyone can get some.
That is to say, the only aim of a Capitalistic Democratic government when it comes to economic policy should be to make it easier or cheaper to manufacture or acquire the stuff we need. Which always and everywhere will beat the pants off a Socialist government where stagnation and lack of production is an inevitability.
And if the proles weren't so far up the left's ass to realize that they are being used for power and control purposes, they'd realize that we are already in an end-state where many resources that 100 years were necessities to life that not everyone had access to, are now basically free and available to everyone. Thank you Capitalism.
I'm not in favor of corporate hand outs (often generalized as "Trickle Down Economics," which is only partially true), but giving money to poor people only funnels the money back to the landed gentry. Like that fucking genius just pointed out happened during Covid (yet the retard can't put two and two together as to why "Trickle Down Economics," isn't as bad as he's making it out to be).
Only wealth creation makes our society better (and sadly, companies generate most of the wealth cause they are efficient at it). The more wealth there is, the more of it there is that poor people can get their hands on easily. Sadly, that means the rich get a lot of it too. But this is why the "wealth gap," doesn't matter. The gap only matters if more is not attainable; but given that most assets are duplicable (not land, that amount is static, but you can make more cars or iphones in an unlimited fashion, essentially), the only thing that matters is making enough that everyone can get some.
That is to say, the only aim of a Capitalistic Democratic government when it comes to economic policy should be to make it easier or cheaper to manufacture or acquire the stuff we need. Which always and everywhere will beat the pants off a Socialist government where stagnation and lack of production is an inevitability.
And if the proles weren't so far up the left's ass to realize that they are being used for power and control purposes, they'd realize that we are already in an end-state where many resources that 100 years were necessities to life that not everyone had access to, are now basically free and available to everyone. Thank you Capitalism.
Last edited:
Chocolate Lab
Kuato Lives
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 28,948
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 60,065
I must have lost my sense of humor because I'm not sure what part of that agenda driven diatribe was funny?
And I'm all for live and let live. But it doesn't make you "super" or "special." Talking like that is like treating a group of people like they are fucking Kindergarteners.
bbgun
every dur is a stab in the heart
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 30,399
Chocolate Lab
Kuato Lives
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 28,948
roughneck266
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2020
- Messages
- 2,827
I guess we should start a company selling cartoon hair colors for her and we can call it Venezuelan Walrus.
Irving Cowboy
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,572
Damn. Girl couldn't get a dude to look at her with a $1,000 bill taped to her forehead.
Chocolate Lab
Kuato Lives
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 28,948
And I saw that Antifa was protesting there and causing problems and the police did nothing.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 125,673
Canada is fucked.
Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,155
Anywhere that embraces leftism is fucked.
Chocolate Lab
Kuato Lives
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 28,948
So absurd it's actually funny.
Smitty
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,155
I don’t see where in the quote it says that Congress can’t cut the funding, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the whacko judge said it. Leftists don’t even follow law anymore.
bbgun
every dur is a stab in the heart
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 30,399
I mean, it's a law. Its constitutionality is not in question.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 137,294
Jesus Fuckin' Christ.