Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dallas - Patriots Trade

Collapse
X
Collapse
First Prev Next Last
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dallas - Patriots Trade

    Would do the following?

    Trade to the Patriots our 19 (1st), 50 (2nd), 116 (4th), and 171 (5th) for their 23rd (1st) and 31st (1st)?

    Likely we could land 2 of Hernandez, DJ Moore, Connor Williams, Evans, LVE (maybe), Courtland Sutton,

    The trade value is dead on though we might be able to extract a little more if they are moving up for Lamar Jackson. Of course it's not like they are QB desperate.
    I was on the draft LVE train. I was for trading for Amari before it happened.
    'nuff said

  • #2
    Originally posted by lostxn View Post
    Would do the following?

    Trade to the Patriots our 19 (1st), 50 (2nd), 116 (4th), and 171 (5th) for their 23rd (1st) and 31st (1st)?

    Likely we could land 2 of Hernandez, DJ Moore, Connor Williams, Evans, LVE (maybe), Courtland Sutton,

    The trade value is dead on though we might be able to extract a little more if they are moving up for Lamar Jackson. Of course it's not like they are QB desperate.
    I would but I doubt the Patriots would. You're only moving down 4 spots.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Cowboysrock55 View Post
      I would but I doubt the Patriots would. You're only moving down 4 spots.
      They get a haul of picks. They would have a better 1st, 3 2nds, a 4th (which they lack), and a 5th (which they lack). If they really want Lamar Jackson, it would make sense. Personally I don't know why anyone would really want Lamar but whatevs.
      I was on the draft LVE train. I was for trading for Amari before it happened.
      'nuff said

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't think the top end talent is worth that in this draft. I sit still and let the draft come to me.
        2016 DCC LOTY Fantasy Football Champion

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by lostxn View Post
          They get a haul of picks. They would have a better 1st, 3 2nds, a 4th (which they lack), and a 5th (which they lack). If they really want Lamar Jackson, it would make sense. Personally I don't know why anyone would really want Lamar but whatevs.
          I mean if I can get LVE and Sutton and still have a third and fourth round pick? I'm down for that. Plus you get that fifth year option on both guys.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hell no. If I'm trading down I want more picks, not less.

            Comment


            • #7
              Yeah, hell no. At some point the picks themselves are worth more than the chart says.

              If they want 19, I’ll take 31 and 43.

              Comment


              • #8
                In this scenario we're moving down only 4 spots in the 1st and giving up a mid-4th and nearly the last pick in the 5th to move up 19 spots from mid-2nd to late-1st. Anybody turning that down should have their heads checked unless someone like James falls to 19.

                Chances are that we'll get substantially the same caliber of player at 23 as we would at 19, if not the exact same player, and then at that point you're only giving up a mid-4th and basically the last pick of the 5th to move up 19 spots into the late 1st.

                Effectively this would be like trading that mid-4th and late-5th to move up from 50 to 31, which is obviously a steal.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Simpleton View Post
                  In this scenario we're moving down only 4 spots in the 1st and giving up a mid-4th and nearly the last pick in the 5th to move up 19 spots from mid-2nd to late-1st. Anybody turning that down should have their heads checked unless someone like James falls to 19.

                  Chances are that we'll get substantially the same caliber of player at 23 as we would at 19, if not the exact same player, and then at that point you're only giving up a mid-4th and basically the last pick of the 5th to move up 19 spots into the late 1st.

                  Effectively this would be like trading that mid-4th and late-5th to move up from 50 to 31, which is obviously a steal.
                  Not just no but hell no.

                  Especially in our circumstances where our depth is so questionable. And rounds 2-4 of this draft look pretty good.

                  Give up 4 picks to get back two? Uh no. No way.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Quote from Peter King:


                    There will be some trades in this draft that might seem one-sided. Several team officials told me in the past few days that they value Day 2 picks (rounds two and three) so highly that they’d be willing to take slightly less in compensation to move down. Where could this come into play? Cleveland (four), Indianapolis (six), Baltimore (16), Seattle (18), New England (23, 31), New Orleans (27), Philadelphia (32). “This is not your typical draft,” said one veteran club official Sunday. “The second, third and even fourth rounds are gold. You can take less than the trade-value chart says and still make a very good trade if you get multiple picks in those rounds.”

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Simpleton View Post
                      In this scenario we're moving down only 4 spots in the 1st and giving up a mid-4th and nearly the last pick in the 5th to move up 19 spots from mid-2nd to late-1st. Anybody turning that down should have their heads checked unless someone like James falls to 19.

                      Chances are that we'll get substantially the same caliber of player at 23 as we would at 19, if not the exact same player, and then at that point you're only giving up a mid-4th and basically the last pick of the 5th to move up 19 spots into the late 1st.

                      Effectively this would be like trading that mid-4th and late-5th to move up from 50 to 31, which is obviously a steal.
                      Yeah I agree with you. These people are crazy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Genghis Khan View Post
                        Not just no but hell no.

                        Especially in our circumstances where our depth is so questionable. And rounds 2-4 of this draft look pretty good.

                        Give up 4 picks to get back two? Uh no. No way.
                        The only picks you're giving up to move from 50 to 31 are a mid-4th and a pick that is more or less an early 6th given that it is a 5th round compensatory pick in the last 4-5 picks of the round.

                        Aside from moving down from 19 to 23, which is negligible.

                        We aren't really giving up a 2nd round pick because we're just moving up from that spot to 31.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Simpleton View Post
                          The only picks you're giving up to move from 50 to 31 are a mid-4th and a pick that is more or less an early 6th given that it is a 5th round compensatory pick in the last 4-5 picks of the round.

                          Aside from moving down from 19 to 23, which is negligible. What if it allows you to get Moore and LVE. That would be insane.

                          We aren't really giving up a 2nd round pick because we're just moving up from that spot to 31.
                          Yep you're talking a couple day 3 picks.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Simpleton View Post
                            The only picks you're giving up to move from 50 to 31 are a mid-4th and a pick that is more or less an early 6th given that it is a 5th round compensatory pick in the last 4-5 picks of the round.

                            Aside from moving down from 19 to 23, which is negligible.

                            We aren't really giving up a 2nd round pick because we're just moving up from that spot to 31.
                            We are giving up 4 picks and only adding two. I have zero interest in that.

                            I get that we're only giving up a 4th and essentially a sixth, but they're still too valuable to me.

                            I mean, our starting QB was essentially a fifth and like half our secondary we're 6th rounders so I wouldn't look at them as throwaways.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Cowboysrock55 View Post
                              Yep you're talking a couple day 3 picks.
                              Kavon Frazier, Dak Prescott, Xavier Woods, Anthony Brown, Charles Tapper, Ryan Switzer.

                              All day 3 picks.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X