p1_
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,561
Not for a second.I don't think a guy like Rodgers or Brady would tolerate his shit.
Not for a second.I don't think a guy like Rodgers or Brady would tolerate his shit.
That’s right. Sandlot style fit both their modes but Romo could adjust to most any enviornment. Bryant may be able to become diciplined and if he lands on a team I think he will do his best to fall in line.Dez needs a gunslinger qb like Romo that realized no matter how much he bitched at him he wasn't going to run the correct route so he had to perfect the jumpball with him, and I have serious doubts even a top tier qb could do that with Dez in their first season together
I at least agree with him on this. It was just straight lazy coaching last year. So far in practice this at least seems to have changed. But Dez is dumb to be saying it. Good luck getting a coaching staff who wants to bring that on.Quote from Dez on the Garrett/Linehan play calling brain trust:
"... garbage ass play calling. Everybody lined up in the same spot for 17 weeks."
First, I don't know how you characterize the Garrett/Linehan coaching effort as "lazy" versus just plain bad -- predictable, unimaginative, conservative to a fault, candy-ass. Second, I don't know how you confine it to one year. The knock on Garrrett has always been how plain-vanilla and predictable his offensive scheme is -- if you can call it a scheme. Third how do coaches who have lacked balls and creativity suddenly, in the summer of 2018, become something they've never been?I at least agree with him on this. It was just straight lazy coaching last year. So far in practice this at least seems to have changed. But Dez is dumb to be saying it. Good luck getting a coaching staff who wants to bring that on.
That’s probably right and why I think Dak will continue to struggle especially in the early part of the season. He isn’t seasoned enough to be an independent play scheme quarterback.First, I don't know how you characterize the Garrett/Linehan coaching effort as "lazy" versus just plain bad -- predictable, unimaginative, conservative to a fault, candy-ass. Second, I don't know how you confine it to one year. The knock on Garrrett has always been how plain-vanilla and predictable his offensive scheme is -- if you can call it a scheme. Third how do coaches who have lacked balls and creativity suddenly, in the summer of 2018, become something they've never been?
Its lazy because it takes hours of game planning and scheming to move players around and take advantage of a defense. The lazy way to do it is to run the same plays you always do and not move anybody around. It takes zero prep and work. You wake up and you just do the same thing you have always done for the last 30 years. That's why I define it as lazy. The coaches get into a comfort zone and don't want to do anything new or different.First, I don't know how you characterize the Garrett/Linehan coaching effort as "lazy" versus just plain bad -- predictable, unimaginative, conservative to a fault, candy-ass. Second, I don't know how you confine it to one year. The knock on Garrrett has always been how plain-vanilla and predictable his offensive scheme is -- if you can call it a scheme. Third how do coaches who have lacked balls and creativity suddenly, in the summer of 2018, become something they've never been?
Not to belabor the point, but how does a lazy coach who does zero prep and work stay as the head coach for eight years?Its lazy because it takes hours of game planning and scheming to move players around and take advantage of a defense. The lazy way to do it is to run the same plays you always do and not move anybody around. It takes zero prep and work. You wake up and you just do the same thing you have always done for the last 30 years. That's why I define it as lazy. The coaches get into a comfort zone and don't want to do anything new or different.
And I say things look different because we are doing totally new things with the receivers. Something that resulted from a changing of the guard at receiver and even more so a new receivers coach. When I hear about Beasley moving around, lining up outside and running routes we've never had him run before that's how I arrive at that conclusion. I think Dooley did very little except go through the motions.
Oh I'm sure he does work. But there are tireless coaches and there are ones who go home at 5 every day. Zimmer for example was a guy who worked around the clock.Not to belabor the point, but how does a lazy coach who does zero prep and work stay as the head coach for eight years?
Ummm. Because he won that thanksgiving day game years ago!Not to belabor the point, but how does a lazy coach who does zero prep and work stay as the head coach for eight years?
I don't know about that. If anything he kind of has all the Cowboys guys coming together at this point. I'd say he is a bit of a unifying force in a way because it gives everyone a guy to look at as the problem.He's gone .. but still causing dissension. Unbelievable.
No doubt Dez was a disruptive force. Undoubtedly a good thing he's gone. But what if he's right about Garrett and his offense and play calling being contributors to the lack of success?He's gone .. but still causing dissension. Unbelievable.
There goes my marriage!He's gone .. but still causing dissension. Unbelievable.
*spoiler alert*No doubt Dez was a disruptive force. Undoubtedly a good thing he's gone. But what if he's right about Garrett and his offense and play calling being contributors to the lack of success?
I've heard too many stories about defensive coordinators and defensive play callers on the field knowing in advance what Garrett would do in a given situation. Dez is not to blame for that.
It doesn't matter if the team is "coming together" if the coaches still suck.