Yeah, and if we went after Riley, I'd be all for it.
But tomorrow's flavor of the month coordinator? Another Chan Gailey? Forget it. We're better off with Garrett.
You say "we know what Garrett is and he doesn't have it," but that's an over generalization. We have been just a very small handful of plays away from advancing every time we've been to the divisional round under him. So maybe yes, we know he's not the master tactician that is going to elevate the team, but those types aren't easy to find. What Garrett HAS done is oversee a team that is well-oiled enough to get to that level with some consistency. Absent a coaching upgrade, I think the smart move is just keep rolling the dice and hope that one of those years you break through. It's not like there's a law of physics that says "Garrett absolutely CANNOT win." A fumble here, a missed tackle there, and you are in the Super Bowl.
You also say, keep trying till you find the right guy. Well what does that mean? A new hiring and firing every 3 years? We've been through that. Switzer-Gailey-Campo-Parcells-Wade. Do that and you kiss the productive portions of the careers of Zeke, Cooper and Dak goodbye.
There is value to the stability that a long term coach brings. Yes, it'd be great if that long term coach was Reid, Belichick, or Payton, but we don't have one of those. Obviously you will never get one if you just stick with Garrett, but my point is, I don't trust Jerry to find one of those off the scrap heap. What I DO trust Jerry to do is throw money at the "can't fail" coaching prospect, and lure him to Dallas with money and power (though obviously no coaching prospect is "can't fail" but some are higher caliber as coaching prospects than others).
So Lincoln Riley, come on down. I'm all for it. But I'm not sure I see a top notch head coach in waiting in the NFL ranks right now.