PFT: Ezekiel Elliott has privately said that he’s planning a training-camp*holdout

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,485
And let's not forget Kamara, who one could argue is just as much of a WR as he is a RB, which could theoretically push his demands even higher. I wouldn't be shocked if he got an extension in the 17 range when the time comes. Ultimately, if the plan is to wait a year or two before extending Elliott we'll probably get caught in the same trap as we did with Lawrence, where we end up paying 2-3 more per year than we could have previously. Of course with Lawrence it made sense to wait given his history but we already know exactly what Elliott is, and on top of that it'd be better to extend him now so that he isn't under contract when he's 29-30.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,485
For the record, I'm not arguing to just give in and pay the players whatever they want. Dak can fuck right off asking for 35/year, I'd offer 32 as a take it or leave it, but Elliott is more than deserving to be the top paid RB in the league and if he's willing to sign a 4/60 deal I'd do it tomorrow and forget about it.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,659
For the record, I'm not arguing to just give in and pay the players whatever they want. Dak can fuck right off asking for 35/year, I'd offer 32 as a take it or leave it, but Elliott is more than deserving to be the top paid RB in the league and if he's willing to sign a 4/60 deal I'd do it tomorrow and forget about it.
If he were a pending free agent I'd probably agree. But I can keep him for 3 more years with the franchise tag. So I wouldn't right now unless its a good deal for the team.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,485
I get that, and if the strategy truly was to keep him for 5 years under his rookie deal, franchise him for a 6th and then let him go, I'd be on board. It's arguable whether or not you'd truly get Elliott at his peak abilities under that scenario, and there'd certainly be plenty of drama, but I'd at least understand the strategy. My issue is that the team has made it obvious that an extension is inevitable at some point, so if that's the case, just get it over with now so you aren't sitting there with a 29 year old Elliott with a $18 million cap hit.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,515
[h=1]Jason Garrett could be final spark, Cowboys' secret weapon to get Ezekiel Elliott deal done before Week 1[/h] [h=2]It's something no one is considering, but they need to when assessing the Elliott situation[/h]

The holdout continues for Ezekiel Elliott, but there's one angle not many are considering that will likely help fast-forward the conclusion of it.

When the Dallas Cowboys stood at 3-5 in the midpoint of the 2018 season, the seat beneath head coach Jason Garrett reeked of burning embers. After all, it was Garrett that allowed the employment of offensive coordinator Scott Linehan to grow much too long in the tooth, and that included empowering his mentor to make an offensive overhaul -- despite evidence that showed the opposite should've occurred. Garrett and the Cowboys suffered two black eyes in the process, by way of releasing the team's all-time leader in receiving touchdowns in Dez Bryant, and making an outright questionable hire in offensive line coach Paul Alexander.

The touted WR-by-committee approach failed miserably -- as did their attempt to first replace Bryant with a $16 million annual payday for Sammy Watkins before then settling on said ill-advised approach -- and Alexander was fired after only seven games with the club. It took promoting longtime assistant OL coach Mark Colombo in Alexander's place and trading away a 2019 first-round pick to the Oakland Raiders for Pro Bowl wide receiver Amari Cooper to right the ship.

Those course corrections saved Garrett's job as the Cowboys went on to win seven of their final eight regular-season games, their second NFC East crown in three years and advance past the Seattle Seahawks in the Wild Card round to make an appearance in the NFC Divisional Round matchup with the Los Angeles Rams. Suddenly, Garrett's seat had become colder than a polar bear's toenails, with owner Jerry Jones almost guaranteeing a contract extension was soon-to-come.

Once the Cowboys were defeated by the Rams, however, the team opted to hold off on extending Garrett, and will instead force him to coach for his job this coming season.

This is where Elliott comes into play, and in monumental fashion.

While the team readies for their dress rehearsal against the Houston Texans on Aug. 24, Elliott has returned to Cabo to continue training after a short weekend trek home to Dallas. The two-time All-Pro is dead set on landing a new contract before he reports to the team, and while talks have been progressive from the outset, the fact is they're still paced a bit slow as key talking points like guaranteed money get hammered out.

The Cowboys contend they've put a "top-5" offer in front of Elliott, but he's arguably the best running back in the league, meaning their eyeing of Le'Veon Bell's contract -- that includes $35 million guaranteed -- doesn't mesh well with how team exec Stephen Jones initially proclaimed the starting point for talks with Elliott would be the contract on Todd Gurley. For reference, Gurley's deal included $45 million in guaranteed money, and that's a $10 million difference not easily shrugged off.

While this all gets worked out, both sides have taken to volleyballing headlines in the media as a leverage-grab -- as has become the norm with NFL negotiations. While owner Jerry Jones playfully jokes about "Zeke who?" and Elliott's agents claim to feel disrespected by the gesture, what's being lost in it all is Garrett's stance.

His job is on the line in 2019, and it's not getting off to the best start.

Before a single regular-season snap has taken place, Garrett has a two-time rushing champ -- who is also the center of the team's offense -- threatening to miss games, adding insult to literal injury as wide receiver Amari Cooper nurses plantar fasciitis in his left foot. Cooper himself refuses to sign his contract offer as well, and even though it's expected he'll participate in Week 1, it's obviously another concern added to Garrett's plate.

A less-than-healthy Cooper may still be impactful, but will he be outright dominant on a bad foot?

That is to-be-determined, but what Garrett does know is Elliott is reportedly in fantastic football shape thanks to his trek to Cabo, and the 24-year-old is starving to get back to football and do damage this coming season. That's exactly what Garrett needs to happen, and it's why he may soon stop whispering in the collective ear of the Joneses and start outright yelling to get a rather clear and obvious point across -- because after making several moves to finally help the offense match serve with the defense, he can't then be put in position to start the season without the most potent weapon on the roster in Elliott.

Even with Cooper having a dominant first few games with the Cowboys in 2018, it was still Elliott whom the team depended upon to carry the ailing offense -- at times to a degree of overkill. Still, the former fourth-overall pick remained durable and available, but the poor scheming by Linehan -- which included removing Elliott from the field in red zone packages or having him present but not utilizing him effectively -- led to an unpublicized contention that eventually mushroomed into the holdout we're all witnessing today.

With Linehan now gone and replaced with a younger, fresh-minded Kellen Moore, the addition of Jon Kitna as quarterbacks coach and the selection of dynamic flex-back Tony Pollard, everything is in place for Garrett to command a Cowboys' team that carries an unpredictable and potentially explosive offense.

Without Elliott, however, that plan is sitting on bricks in the parking lot.

Pollard believes he can carry the load as the starter in Elliott's absence, and he's supposed to. His skill set is obvious, but he's meant as a compliment for Elliott -- not a replacement. Elliott remains the best rusher on the team, and the best pass blocker as well, the latter being a category much-needed for a Cowboys' team that can't afford to see Dak Prescott go down with an injury for any amount of time. Combining Pollard with a newly re-signed Alfred Morris might be an effective salve for the wound of potentially missing Elliott, but it's much akin to applying gauze to a bullet wound.

News flash: You're still bleeding out, only slower.

The elder Jones understands this fully, despite his negotiating tactics being executed in the media. This is why between snarky comments -- particularly the table-pounding of "team team team" following the new deal on linebacker Jaylon Smith -- when asked in early August if he was concerned about not getting a deal done with Elliott; his understanding of the running back's value shone through.

"No, I don't consider it," he said. "When have I ever not done one? So, I don't worry about that."

For Garrett's sake, that braggadocios proclamation from Jones better hold true. It's the same Jones that made it clear this offseason that money is not the issue, however, before suddenly pretending it is in fact the issue. In reality, the Cowboys have $23.9 million in cap space and can approach nearly $100 million in space in 2020, leaving plenty of pie for the top three offensive stars. An extension on Cooper in 2019 would reduce his $13.9 million salary cap hit this season and free up that much more money for the likes of Elliott, who isn't apt to accept playing contractual second fiddle to Gurley -- a player who also has longterm health concerns regarding his knee.

When push comes to shove in the Elliott holdout, as it is now after weeks of negotiating, you can count on Garrett sitting down with the Joneses to make a case for why he needs Elliott on the field. As it stands, a source has continued to affirm me for weeks the deal will likely get done before Week 1, and that's good news for all involved. Garrett has been in constant contact with Elliott, and he describes their discussions as wholly positive.

For the former, having Elliott is not simply about managing the cap. It's about Garrett's future with the Cowboys and, for him, it's worth upping the offer to make sure the team's big gun is back in the holster before they host the New York Giants on Sept. 8.

Bang.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,515
With his holdout is at 27 days, Ezekiel Elliott could face fines and repayment of a prorated portion of signing bonus money from the Cowboys totaling a little more than $2 million. He is subject to a fine of $40,000 each day he misses, and the team can seek up to 25 percent of his $4.087 million signing bonus proration. If he misses a regular-season game, he would miss out on roughly $226,000 each week. Whenever the holdout ends, will the Cowboys enforce the penalties?

Todd Archer, ESPN Staff Writer1m ago
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,659
With his holdout is at 27 days, Ezekiel Elliott could face fines and repayment of a prorated portion of signing bonus money from the Cowboys totaling a little more than $2 million. He is subject to a fine of $40,000 each day he misses, and the team can seek up to 25 percent of his $4.087 million signing bonus proration. If he misses a regular-season game, he would miss out on roughly $226,000 each week. Whenever the holdout ends, will the Cowboys enforce the penalties?

Todd Archer, ESPN Staff Writer1m ago
When has a player ever had to pay it though. You know Dallas won't which just makes those rules kind of sad and meaningless.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,485
As I've been saying, they're clearly willing to offer Elliott somewhere around 13.5-14 AAV (Bell got 13.1, Gurley got 14.3). I understand that there could be some haggling to do to regarding the guaranteed money but to me if you're willing to pay 13.5 -14 you might as well just make it 14.5-15 if this drags on another week or so and that's what it absolutely takes to get it done. Anything above 15 and he can fuck off.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,495
Money starts at Gurley, right?
 

GShock

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
6,389
Money starts at Gurley, right?
If I'm Elliott and I know:

1. How this franchise handled Murray;
2. How this coach has used me;
3. That this coach is in the last year of his contract, coaching for his job;
4. That this will be my best contract; and
5. How I stack up against Gurley?

Yes.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,495
If I'm Elliott and I know:

1. How this franchise handled Murray;
2. How this coach has used me;
3. That this coach is in the last year of his contract, coaching for his job;
4. That this will be my best contract; and
5. How I stack up against Gurley?

Yes.
6. Jerry or Stephen said that exact thing at end of season to the media.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,485
I mean let's be real here, quibbling over 13.5 vs. 14.5 or 14 vs. 15 in AAV is pointless in the grand scheme for an elite player. It's very possible that this is all a negotiation tactic to try to wear down Elliott as low as he'll go before finally giving in right before the season starts, and if so that's fine, but it's going to be real pathetic if this guy misses games over 1 million in AAV because the front office wants to hold some made-up negotiating line. This is based on the assumption that a deal averaging 14.5-15 a year would put this to bed.
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,800
It would be a great show of leadership for Dak to take a reduced rate contract in order to free the team to sign Zeke to the elite money he deserves.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
52,659
I mean let's be real here, quibbling over 13.5 vs. 14.5 or 14 vs. 15 in AAV is pointless in the grand scheme for an elite player. It's very possible that this is all a negotiation tactic to try to wear down Elliott as low as he'll go before finally giving in right before the season starts, and if so that's fine, but it's going to be real pathetic if this guy misses games over 1 million in AAV because the front office wants to hold some made-up negotiating line. This is based on the assumption that a deal averaging 14.5-15 a year would put this to bed.
How do you know what Zeke is demanding?
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,485
It's an assumption, I can't imagine that he's actually asking for 15+, I guess we'll find out eventually.
 

Sheik

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
10,943
Imagine how much money Dak stands to lose if Zeke is a long term holdout or ends up traded. Assuming he(Dak) isn't signed before the season starts.
 

Couchcoach

DCC 4Life
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
2,971
It would be a great show of leadership for Dak to take a reduced rate contract in order to free the team to sign Zeke to the elite money he deserves.
Ain't hap'nin
Dak will demand big time money even though he's average at best. Unfortunately, there's not enough Jaylon Smiths in this league.
 
Top Bottom