Prescott Contract Watch Thread...

[Simpleton]

Jerry has been chasing his own Payton/McVay, young hotshot QB guru/imaginative playcaller type since 2007 when he hired Garrett as OC before Phillips was even hired as the HC. If the offense continues to look like that, and if Jerry looks at Moore as that type of coach, there is no chance he lets him go and I think all options would be on the table, including making Moore HC and perhaps giving Garrett some sort of front office type position. It would be an unprecedented type of move but nothing would surprise me.

 

[1bigfan13]

Never forget

 

[mcnuttz]

So I'm probably getting ahead of myself but what if Kellen Moore keeps this up all year long. The team will do well and NFL teams will want Kellen Moore as their coach. Do you keep Garrett and let theboffensive coordinator go? That's the normal way NFL teams do business. But how do you not attribute the success to Kellen and dump Garrett who seems to bring nothing to the table on offense or defense?

Imagine if we lose Moore and Richard next year, with Garrett and Marinelli to lead the charge.

 

[NoDak]

Imagine if we lose Moore and Richard next year, with Garrett and Marinelli to lead the charge.

 

[Cotton]

That kid has a ginormous head.

 

[dbair1967]

Imagine if we lose Moore and Richard next year, with Garrett and Marinelli to lead the charge.

Based on what we saw vs the Rams and then the Giants yesterday, losing Richard would be like losing Linehan

 

[mcnuttz]

Based on what we saw vs the Rams and then the Giants yesterday, losing Richard would be like losing Linehan

I do not endorse this post.

 

[NoDak]

I do not endorse this post.

Just smile and nod.


He's still inundated with DCU stank.

 

[Simpleton]

The interesting thing about potentially losing Richard is that there are a good number of HC's who were very good 4-3 DC's that could potentially be fired who we could go after as a replacement. Mike Zimmer, Ron Rivera, and Dan Quinn who was the DC over Richard when he was the Seahawks DB coach, could all feasibly be let go.

 

[icup]

Just smile and nod.


He's still inundated with DCU stank.

DISCLAIMER: The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed by dbair belong solely to dbair, and are not shared or endorsed by the DCU, its members, and its staff.

 

[NoDak]

DISCLAIMER: The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed by dbair belong solely to dbair, and are not shared or endorsed by the DCU, its members, and its staff.

Damn. Even the DCU doesn't want to claim him. Harsh.

 

[boozeman]

 

[Simpleton]

Charles Robinson said the primary point of contention is that the Cowboys want to do an extension for 5-7 years as opposed to 4. Of course if the player believes in themselves they want the 4 year deal so they can hit the market again sooner, and apparently Prescott wants a higher AAV in return for giving the team more years of control. If I were running things I'd be more than happy to do a shorter 4 year deal in the 32-33 range, which is the AAV Robinson implies we want, and then if Prescott continues to play at an elite level you're happy to pay that bill when it comes due.

 

[Cowboysrock55]

Charles Robinson said the primary point of contention is that the Cowboys want to do an extension for 5-7 years as opposed to 4. Of course if the player believes in themselves they want the 4 year deal so they can hit the market again sooner, and apparently Prescott wants a higher AAV in return for giving the team more years of control. If I were running things I'd be more than happy to do a shorter 4 year deal in the 32-33 range, which is the AAV Robinson implies we want, and then if Prescott continues to play at an elite level you're happy to pay that bill when it comes due.

I mean you can give him a higher AAV but it's got to be backloaded. I mean 5 years from now 40 mil for a QB will probably be nothing. So give it to him down the line on the contract and don't make it guaranteed if that makes him feel better. It will make the contract look more insane but who cares.

That or take the 4 year extension. It's not like Dak is leaving the team 5 years from now anyway. That dude is a lifer unless he flames out.

 

[Smitty]

Charles Robinson said the primary point of contention is that the Cowboys want to do an extension for 5-7 years as opposed to 4. Of course if the player believes in themselves they want the 4 year deal so they can hit the market again sooner, and apparently Prescott wants a higher AAV in return for giving the team more years of control. If I were running things I'd be more than happy to do a shorter 4 year deal in the 32-33 range, which is the AAV Robinson implies we want, and then if Prescott continues to play at an elite level you're happy to pay that bill when it comes due.

Agreed.

 

[NoDak]

Give him the 4 years. If he plays up to the contract, you can sign him to another. If not, Trey Lance will be ready by then.

 

[dbair1967]

I do not endorse this post.

That's fine. But he shouldn't get a pass while Marinelli gets hammered when Richard is running the defense and calling the plays.

His last two games have been garbage, and the NYG game to close last season was garbage too. That's 3 out of 4 clunkers in a row.

 

[1bigfan13]

Imagine if we lose Moore and Richard next year, with Garrett and Marinelli to lead the charge.

The first two branches from the "Garrett coaching tree"?

 

[p1_]

Imagine if we lose Moore and Richard next year, with Garrett and Marinelli to lead the charge.

No way do Richard and Moore leave Garrett in charge. One will succeed him, and I kinda hope it’s Moore

 

[GForce78NJ]

No way do Richard and Moore leave Garrett in charge. One will succeed him, and I kinda hope it’s Moore

we need to relax with the Moore dick riding. He called a great game but he's legit 1 game into his OC coaching career. Let's at least get 1/3rd through the season guys