People have obsessed on the position since the Thomas rumors. Once a hot model seriously flirts with you it can be harder to accept your plain Jane girlfriend.Heath played over 97% of the snaps last year, he has been 2nd on the defense in snaps played in 2017 and 2018. We have had good to very good defenses with him playing extremely high snaps, he's not useless, he's just not what you ideally want as a starter. He's an excellent 3rd safety.
I think that's similar to the logic they seemed to use in deciding which way to go when on the clock.If Hill is better than Crawford, the impact is far greater than any one of the 2nd round safeties over Heath would have been.
I agree. Heath is a very servicable player and one that is better than some and not as good as a few. I dare say he could start on half of the teams.Heath played over 97% of the snaps last year, he has been 2nd on the defense in snaps played in 2017 and 2018. We have had good to very good defenses with him playing extremely high snaps, he's not useless, he's just not what you ideally want as a starter. He's an excellent 3rd safety.
That's not really true though. If Hill is only very slightly better than Crawford but Thornhill is light years better than Heath than you're wrong. At least in the immediate future. But let's be real. Crawford is a better D-lineman than Heath is a safety. I'm not a big fan of Crawford but he is at least viewed as a solid player. Heath is a liability. Granted he might be our only real liability on starting defense which is why the unit can still be really good even though he isn't. But let's be real, Crawford would not be out of a job long if cut. Can you say the same thing about Heath?People have obsessed on the position since the Thomas rumors. Once a hot model seriously flirts with you it can be harder to accept your plain Jane girlfriend.
An upgrade at safety is hard to compare with one at 3T.
I don’t understand how we could forget the clear need at 3T we’ve had since La’roi Glover or maybe one season with Jason Hatcher. And in those years we sucked everywhere else.
Heath isn’t special, but he gets the job done. If Hill is better than Crawford, the impact is far greater than any one of the 2nd round safeties over Heath would have been.
And if Derek Carr doesn't hold the ball out like a retard Heath loses us that game.Heath was not a liability overall last season, critical mistake against LA aside.
He was just average, and absolutely comparable to anything Xavier Woods did. He’s grown to be capable, and you can never fault his effort (unlike Taco). The guy hustles and makes surprising splash plays here and there. He flat out won the Oakland game in 2017.
and absolutely comparable to anything Xavier Woods did.
PFF ranked Woods as the 46th safety in the NFL and I only expect him to get better. Heath was in the 80s. I'd say that's pretty spot on. One is a good starting safety but not meant to be your best safety. The other doesn't belong starting. Despite what Ravi thinks.
Uh.... No.
He has also saved a couple of games last season.And if Derek Carr doesn't hold the ball out like a retard Heath loses us that game.
PFF isn't the end all be all but Heath was their 81st ranked safety in the NFL. Which is probably pretty accurate. Good enough to be a backup but not good enough to be a starter.
Crawford was the 49th ranked DT. Which is good enough to start in the NFL but certainly not good enough to be a 3 technique on a top defense.
Both guys clearly needed upgraded. But Heath was the way bigger liability. It's not even close. His missed tackles and lack of ability in coverage cost Dallas on defense. He may have the bigger splash play but his fuckups cost us far more. Tyron just didn't produce as much as we would all like and want for this defense. Big difference.
It's funny because I was up with the baby last night and the Eagles replay was on. I had forgot how he almost single handily lost that game by giving up the 60 yard catch to Algohlor. But we won so all is forgiven.AHeath also saved a couple of games so it all rounds out. The guy has always been slow to react or sometimes
He has also saved a couple of games last season.
He has also saved a couple of games last season.And if Derek Carr doesn't hold the ball out like a retard Heath loses us that game.
PFF isn't the end all be all but Heath was their 81st ranked safety in the NFL. Which is probably pretty accurate. Good enough to be a backup but not good enough to be a starter.
Crawford was the 49th ranked DT. Which is good enough to start in the NFL but certainly not good enough to be a 3 technique on a top defense.
Both guys clearly needed upgraded. But Heath was the way bigger liability. It's not even close. His missed tackles and lack of ability in coverage cost Dallas on defense. He may have the bigger splash play but his fuckups cost us far more. Tyron just didn't produce as much as we would all like and want for this defense. Big difference.
Check to Oakland game and memory serves me that the Jacksonville game but that one could be wrong. I am going on memory but I’m pretty sure about Oakland.It's funny because I was up with the baby last night and the Eagles replay was on. I had forgot how he almost single handily lost that game by giving up the 60 yard catch to Algohlor. But we won so all is forgiven.
You can't claim Jeff Heath "saved" a game when the only reason the other team is in the game is because he blew it.
Oakland wasn't even last year.Check to Oakland game and memory serves me that the Jacksonville game but that one could be wrong. I am going on memory but I’m pretty sure about Oakland.
I don’t believe I stipulated last season. I guess I did. Error on my part but it was a game saver just the same.Oakland wasn't even last year.
Jacksonville was a blowout. I hope those aren't your two examples of Heath winning games for us last season.
I mean he did force Carr to fumble in that game. But that's a major outlier compared to the other 99% of his plays.I don’t believe I stipulated last season. I guess I did. Error on my part but it was a game saver just the same.
He is better than you depict but if you don’t like him , you don’t like him but I happen to like him so it’s simply a matter of a disagreement on our perceptions. The Cowboys have given the indication in the draft that they like him too so I will just leave it at that and you can continue to not like him. How’s that?I mean he did force Carr to fumble in that game. But that's a major outlier compared to the other 99% of his plays.
I disagree. He isn't better than I depict. The stats backup the fact that he is a #3 level safety and shouldn't be starting. If PFF ranks him in the 80's it makes him a borderline 3 to 4 safety.He is better than you depict but if you don’t like him , you don’t like him but I happen to like him so it’s simply a matter of a disagreement on our perceptions. The Cowboys have given the indication in the draft that they like him too so I will just leave it at that and you can continue to not like him. How’s that?