- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 17,987
Yep...Rams and Eagles...I'd say the Saints and Seattle are in that list too.The Eagles.
Yep...Rams and Eagles...I'd say the Saints and Seattle are in that list too.The Eagles.
Thats the part that no one talks about. Its great to draft well, but in todays NFL you still need some proven difference makers via FA to get deep into the playoffs or win a SB, especially if you don't have a Tom Brady or Rothlisberger on your roster.Which we don't, and haven't had since Aikman.Actually this makes sense. We've drafted very well for about 8-9 years now, and that's great. But retaining the quality players is so expensive you can't realistically keep them all. Guess that's why some have said that in today's league you have a small window to win championships. But elite organizations know how to balance the cap with free agency. Dallas simply doesn't do that. Something else the top teams have is future HOF QB's.
And for all our great draft moves, we still can't get past the divisional round.
And just think, when McClay takes a GM job somewhere else we're right back to 2009 drafts.
Safety and difference-making DT -- two things we haven't had around these parts in ages.Out of curiosity what do you think are huge needs?
Personally I think pass rush is our biggest need, but it's only huge if we don't sign Lawrence.
The reason they’re near the bottom is because they’ve got so many starters on rookie contracts.I hate this narrative that if the darn salary cap wasn't there, Jerry would spend, spend, spend. Maybe earlier in his career. Not now.
As far as actual spending on player salaries, Dallas is near the bottom of the league.
25th from 2013 to 2016
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/l...-eagles-arent/
30th in 2018
https://overthecap.com/2018-spending-on-nfl-rosters/
They resign their own to gimmicky contracts, constantly restructure and push dead money around. Their cap issues are constantly self inflicted.
They have no desire to spend. They are a corporation that has figured out how to maximize profits. Winning? Sure, that'd be nice, but not at the expense of profits.