The way I read your post was that by calling Garrett a lame duck coach you thought he was on his way out. I was commenting on what Garrett’s future might be if Moore was successful. I didn’t indicate whether you were commenting on Moore’s potential.
I should’ve added Riley to the list. And I don’t see any reason why Harbaugh would want to come here, either. I added him because he’s a big enough name to keep people interested. We all know that Jerry doesn’t care about winning so long as the team remains relevant and makes money. Harbaugh keeps us relevant. Terrible fit, but he checks the “relevant” box.
I didn't say anything about whether Garrett is going to be fired or not. I only commented on why an established coordinator would not be interested in being hired in a spot where there is a lame duck coach. And the term lame duck does not mean he's not going to be retained. Only that he is in the last year of his contract.
Lame ducks can also mean someone going out but whatever. I was simply making a comment.
Like Jason back in the day, they're grooming Moore to be HC. Deal with it.
Exactly. There are no scheme changes with him. No adjustments. No game planning for strengths and weaknesses. Same crap, week in and week out.
Well I naturally think he should have been gone years ago. Still doesnt change my statement. Teams have to find a way to win even in adverse conditions.
I was talking in general teams. Im fully aware of this teams dysfunction but we all should hope for the best.
