L.T. Fan
I'm Easy If You Are
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 21,689
That quote it totally incorrect. I did not say what you wrote. I said he was found neither guilty or innocent the case was dropped. The ruling was never that he was innocent. It was simply dropped. I also sai the NFL had a right to investigate the matter.This is correct and is what is the problem. They have carte blanche when it comes to discipline. Zeke was innocent in the eyes of the law, yet given a six game suspension with very little evidence to support him being guilty. Hill had some fairly damning evidence against him and he gets nothing. Somehow, LT thinks one case is independent of each other, I guess. I can’t otherwise explain why he is saying stupid stuff like “Well, he wasn’t proven innocent so he should be seen as guilty in the eyes of the NFL.”
And It not the same as the example you are using with the Mueller report. Mueller stated that there was not sufficient evidence to indict but he also said it was not readily evident that he didn’t commit a crime therefore he would leave that allegation for someone else to rule on. The Attorney General ruled on that part the allegation as not being sufficient to indict and therefore the Mueller report was concluded The only thing the report was conclusive about was collusion but the report didn’t exonerate Trump from the second charge the Attorneys Generals decision did.
One instance was dropped and the other instance was formally concluded.