Sturm: What Are We Doing at RT? The Tyson Clabo Report

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,622
What Are We Doing at RT? The Tyson Clabo Report







Now that the smoke has cleared from the draft weekend, we believe that the Cowboys are doing what they claimed they would be doing this week: Trying to sort through their right tackle situation.

This is clearly difficult when your stated objectives seem to be to handle it at a really cheap price, given the lack of cap room this year, but more importantly are the cap issues that lie ahead after the 2013 season. This limits the Cowboys to a series of 1-year solutions at right tackle, and frankly, when those are the parameters of your search, your options all have flaws or issues.

The least difficult solution at right tackle is to go back to the Doug Free well. The reason that this is easy is obviously because he is already under contract, is likely to agree to a pay cut, and you are familiar with his realities. Of course, you are also familiar with the fact that he led all NFL tackles with 15 penalties and conceded 6 sacks, 4 hits, and 41 QB hurries in 2012.

On the other hand, Free did finish 2012 with 3 consecutive games of very solid play as games against the Steelers, Saints, and Redskins all were almost completely clean from just about every perspective. Free seldom struggles in the running game, so all of his issues start with his feet and his difficulty in closing the edge off on pass rush. Even the penalties start there as he is usually cheating the snap and trying to get an extra step against pass rushers so he false starts.

Free is 29 and expensive, but I assume the Cowboys can give him a rather large hair-cut and he will accept it because this is no time to be looking for a job. In fact, the timing of this couldn't not be better from that perspective if you are the Cowboys. Eric Winston and Tyson Clabo have been free agents for a month now, and since they have both gone unsigned, you can see how Free must be doing the math in his head. Here, if he takes a pay cut, you would assume RT would be his job to lose. On the street, he is looking at a minimum deal and a chance to compete for a job after June 1. He really is in a bind and the Cowboys can use that against him to a point.

However, let's say they are determined to "fix" this spot and really improve the offensive line with the additions of Travis Frederick and a new Right Tackle who can give them strong play. I confess that they would really fix their issues offensively if Free and center were suddenly upgraded.

And that leads us to Winston and Clabo. After talking with a few people in NFL Personnel, the discussion rather quickly dismisses Winston as an upgrade. One simply said, "That wouldn't be an upgrade at all." It wasn't long ago that Eric Winston was thought of as solid down in Houston, but the feeling in the league right now is that he would be a solid backup option.

So, to Tyson Clabo, where there the word is not as unkind. I decided to break down his last 2 games for the Falcons and then an overview of his year in Atlanta before they released him on April 4 as a June 1-cut designation.

Before 2011, Clabo was given a 5-year deal for $25 million with $11.5m guaranteed. The base salaries were low in 2011 and 2012, but from 2013-2015, they would head north to $4.5m per. The Falcons are, of course, a team that is constructed in a way where they are young and building. One of the byproducts of that is needing to put some big numbers on "QB1" Matt Ryan, and to do that, they need cap space. With Clabo 31 years old, they see him as a replaceable veteran with 2 former 3rd Round picks ready to battle it out to play RT for the Falcons in 2013 at a significantly cheaper price.

But, in looking at Clabo from a Cowboys perspective, the questions are as follows:

1) - Is he an upgrade from Doug Free

Yes. I think he has shown that he is a very good pass protector on the edge. He had a disaster game against Carolina in Week 4 when Charles Johnson ate him for dinner (3 sacks against Clabo, 4 sacks in the game) but after that Clabo is not debited with a single sack against for the rest of the year. In the running game, he might be slightly less that Free as far as running to space, but in the zone blocking scheme, he is fine on play-side and on the back-side his expertise in the cut block has landed him on the NFL's "dirtiest players" lists several times for chopping linemen down.

He played both Seattle and San Francisco in the playoffs last January and both of those sides can really stress you with their pass rushes. He was absolutely fine in both games against the edge rushing, so much so that in many cases, they attacked elsewhere on the line and only half-heartedly attacked Clabo. Ray McDonald did have a strength advantage against Clabo on a few plays - mostly on the run - but, that is a very large and strong player who will do that against most challengers.

Clabo seldom had help and seldom needed it (he committed just 5 penalties in 2012). He really looked strong in all of his pass protection sets and was giving the Falcons plenty to help hold up Ryan's strong side. I think he would be a tremendous upgrade from Free for a team that wants to pass 40 times a game. He will give up some pressure on occasion, but most weeks, he gave the Falcons plenty of protection on the right flank.

2) - Is he a candidate for a 1-year, $3m or $4m deal?

I kind of doubt it. And this is the tug-o-war that is going on with Clabo and his suitors. I am sure he thinks he is worth a multiple year deal at his going rate (say, 3-years /$15 million) and teams around the league all have tackles and/or cap issues. Once you sort through and find teams with both a need a tackle and cap room, your options are limited as a player - even one who has been to many pro bowls and has played well for 8 years on a playoff team.

But, I assume there is a happy medium and it looks like Miami is knocking on his door pretty hard. They might be playing the same game by using Winston and Clabo (and Bryant McKinnie) all against each-other in a game of poker to see who will take the least years and the least money. Miami also needs a tackle after losing Jake Long to St Louis this year and needing another starting tackle, too.

The Cowboys absolutely want a 1-year deal with Clabo, I suspect. There is no doubt that his camp is holding on to the idea that he has earned more than that. He is an upgrade from Free, but given the storm clouds of cap issues hitting them again next winter, I figure they want to use their cap surplus that they currently have (almost $5m after the Romo deal) but not dip into 2014 funds if possible.

If it is an issue of upgrading this OL, then I think you go get Tyson Clabo on a deal if you can get a 1-year deal or a multiple year deal with limited money guaranteed in year 2 or year 3. But, football issues are always balanced against cap issues, and that is why we know the Cowboys will be careful not to get crazy. Miami controls this game with their money, and if they bid too high on Clabo, expect Free to be your right tackle in 2013.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,208
If it is an issue of upgrading this OL, then I think you go get Tyson Clabo on a deal if you can get a 1-year deal or a multiple year deal with limited money guaranteed in year 2 or year 3. But, football issues are always balanced against cap issues, and that is why we know the Cowboys will be careful not to get crazy. Miami controls this game with their money, and if they bid too high on Clabo, expect Free to be your right tackle in 2013.
Then it's a lock. Clabo is a Dolphin and Free stays in Dallas.
 

Jiggyfly

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
9,220
And that leads us to Winston and Clabo. After talking with a few people in NFL Personnel, the discussion rather quickly dismisses Winston as an upgrade. One simply said, "That wouldn't be an upgrade at all." It wasn't long ago that Eric Winston was thought of as solid down in Houston, but the feeling in the league right now is that he would be a solid backup option.
This has been my thinking on Winston, I would rather have Parnell and Free battle it out than go with Winston I'm sorry but you just don't get cut from 2 teams in 2 years if you are better than a Jag.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
This has been my thinking on Winston, I would rather have Parnell and Free battle it out than go with Winston I'm sorry but you just don't get cut from 2 teams in 2 years if you are better than a Jag.
I think the KC situation is special. They knew they were going to franchise one tackle and draft another first overall. There's really no reason Winston wouldn't be the odd man out.

Also, how could he not be an upgrade? Free's not even a JAG, he's a train wreck. If he's the starter next year I'll be shocked if he's not Rob Pettiti-level bad.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,024
I think the KC situation is special. They knew they were going to franchise one tackle and draft another first overall. There's really no reason Winston wouldn't be the odd man out.

Also, how could he not be an upgrade? Free's not even a JAG, he's a train wreck. If he's the starter next year I'll be shocked if he's not Rob Pettiti-level bad.
I agree on Winston. But as much as I want to get rid of Free, I doubt we will. Our FO has seen "improvement". The first half or so of last year was historically bad. When they started him sharing time, he improved over the last few games. Now, he wasn't somebody we should be counting on to anchor the right side, but he did improve. Moving forwards, that sucks as we can't count on him to continue to improve, but you know that's exactly what we will do. The excuses will be that the other tackles priced themselves out of our range, and the draft didn't shake out right. But it was probably the plan all along.

I'm still holding out hope we sign either Winston or Clabo, but I would be shocked if we actually did.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,526
I think the KC situation is special. They knew they were going to franchise one tackle and draft another first overall. There's really no reason Winston wouldn't be the odd man out.

Also, how could he not be an upgrade? Free's not even a JAG, he's a train wreck. If he's the starter next year I'll be shocked if he's not Rob Pettiti-level bad.
Free has always been a sub-par run blocker, but at least I will give him this, that he was not as train-wreck bad in pass protection in previous years before 2012.

Of course, once a player loses it as badly as he did last year, I don't know if there's any way for him to get it back. His confidence must be blown, or his work ethic gone, or something is just missing, and I don't know if he can recover it.

He has never really been what I would consider an ideal OL solution. But, while it wouldn't surprise me to see him be just as bad or worse next season, it also wouldn't surprise me to see him be not QUITE as bad either. He's had better seasons, so it's in him somewhere.

I would not even dream of taking the chance. Especially, if you are Jerry Jones, knowing that you've only got a handful more chances with the Romo core. Why would you risk throwing it away on Doug Free when there are better options available, within striking distance?

But that's the reality we face with having an idiot for a GM.
 

Clay_Allison

Old Bastard
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
5,488
Free never was super talented, but he stopped working hard after he got his big deal. He had a pretty bad 2011, probably because he didn't do anything over the lockout. He went into 2012 not giving a shat and now that he has no reason to play well he will go back to being Rob Pettiti in 2013.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,208
Fuck you, Jerry. This Free bullshit just pissed away another year. When a gift like Clabo falls from the sky, act like you give a shit.

Jerry acts like a damned miser unless it's to benefit his own ego. He's been trying to sell people on Livings, Free, Bernadeau, and Costa for over a year now and the only one he's managed to convince is himself.
 

ravidubey

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
20,208
This coach goes with the flow (i.e. Jerry's menstrual flow) and hence can't get anything done. He has too much confidence or faith or some other belief system that he can get things turned around and also likes his paycheck too much to make his own waves. He's kidding himself, and indications from the "war room" suggest he might finally be accepting this.

Garrett can't stand for the OL because that would represent a public acceptance that Jerry sucks at building them. He's trapped in Jerry-world.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,622
Lots of coaches suck in personnel.
I am sure those coaches are smart enough to not get involved as much as Garrett, the son of a scout, does.

I love how you view Garrett as some innocent in all of this. He's had his share of input over the years.

The ideal situation is coaches coach, coaches tell the scouts what kind of player the coaches want, the scouts scout and the GM is intellectually capable of making the proper decision based on the result.

Based on our model, which supposedly changes from year to year (remember this was a "scout's draft"), you could have the coach helping the inept GM make the final selections, even if it goes directly against what the scouting department has spent all year around. In years past you had Phillips and Garrett making calls to get Jason Williams and Felix Jones. This year, I dunno where the hell Jones and Goof Son got off overruling the scouting staff, yet again, because it sure didn't look like Garrett was happy about it either.

Coaches don't scout these people. They come into things very very late in the process and their say should be the absolute least when it comes down to making the final selection.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,526
This coach goes with the flow (i.e. Jerry's menstrual flow) and hence can't get anything done. He has too much confidence or faith or some other belief system that he can get things turned around and also likes his paycheck too much to make his own waves. He's kidding himself, and indications from the "war room" suggest he might finally be accepting this.

Garrett can't stand for the OL because that would represent a public acceptance that Jerry sucks at building them. He's trapped in Jerry-world.
I think this is more the case, rather than "Garrett doesn't value the OL."

I think Garrett just isn't going to cross Jerry. Yeah, if he was standing up and jumping on the table for one, I'm sure things would be different. But Garrett is too complicit letting Jerry have his way, as opposed to being a football moron who doesn't understand that you need linemen.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,622
Garrett can't stand for the OL because that would represent a public acceptance that Jerry sucks at building them. He's trapped in Jerry-world.
Garrett doesn't know or value the OL. He doesn't spend a lot of time around it and probably delegates it out, far too much to the line coach.

When our inept GM goes to Hudson Houck for input and takes a guy like Robert Brewster, something is wrong.

Hell, can any of you recall hearing who the hell the OL coach for Baltimore is? Hell, Harbaugh is a ST guy at heart, you don't see Newsome running around drafting punters and kickers and shit.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
22,526
I am sure those coaches are smart enough to not get involved as much as Garrett, the son of a scout, does.

I love how you view Garrett as some innocent in all of this. He's had his share of input over the years.
He's had his share of input because that's the system that the general manager has set up.

In a functional system, such as Baltimore, Garrett would not be fighting Ozzie Newsome demanding that Newsome downgrade the OL. He would just be going with the flow and he'd be doing the actual coaching, not the GM-hand-holding he's required to here.

So it's hard for me to use the word "guilty." He's not guilty. He's failing because he's being asked to do something he's not competent to do, and he shouldn't be asked to do it.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
122,622
I think this is more the case, rather than "Garrett doesn't value the OL."

I think Garrett just isn't going to cross Jerry. Yeah, if he was standing up and jumping on the table for one, I'm sure things would be different. But Garrett is too complicit letting Jerry have his way, as opposed to being a football moron who doesn't understand that you need linemen.
How can you "cross" someone who doesn't have a strong opinion of their own? Garrett doesn't value the OL, he doesn't care to get that involved, neither does Jerry. It is evident in the way they have believed you can just take whatever POS the OL coach recommends.

Jerry Jones has a very cursory knowledge of every player in a draft. He goes off who shouts the loudest and even then, he sometimes goes against that too...but trust me it is not based on close personal knowledge of any of these prospects. He needs to be convinced the majority of the time.

We make fun of the times he takes a shine to a Quincy Carter or Roy Williams, but there are countless other times we know we pick players based on someone jumping up on a table.
 
Top Bottom